Front Page  »  

Company can pump oil off Santa Barbara coast, judge rules

August 22, 2026

By KAREN VELIE

A federal judge ruled this week that Sable Offshore can continue extracting oil off the coast of Santa Barbara, and pumping it through a pipeline, under a Trump administration emergency order. The ruling removed state oversight, which was transferred to federal officials.

Even though California no longer has regulatory authority over the pipeline, Sable is required to share biannual reports with the state, the judge ruled.

In addition, the judge fined Sable $1.4 million for failing to comply with a consent decree that required Sable to attain state approvals before restarting pumping.

In 2015, a pipe owned by Plains All American Pipeline ruptured near Refugio State Beach in Santa Barbara County, causing more than 100,000 gallons of oil to spill. About 21,000 gallons flowed into a culvert and then into a ditch that drains to the ocean.

In 2024, Sable purchased the pipeline, three offshore platforms and a processing facility, and subsequently made repairs to the corroded pipeline.

For more than a year, state and federal regulators have battled over the reopening of the Santa Ynez pipeline, which is needed to transport the oil extracted off the coast of Santa Barbara. While the State Fire Marshal argued Sable had not yet completed all of the repairs necessary to restart the pipeline, federal regulators claimed they had jurisdictional control.

In May 2025, Sable resumed oil production in federal waters offshore of Santa Barbara County. It started extracting oil from one of three platforms that had been closed since the 2015 spill.

In January, President Donald Trump directed Sable to resume oil production off the coast of Santa Barbara under the Defense Production Act. Sable had been prevented from producing oil because of disagreements over permitting its Santa Ynez pipeline.

Sable is slated to produce approxamatly 50,000 barrels of oil per day, “a 15% increase to California’s in-state oil production, that can replace nearly 1.5 million barrels of foreign crude each month,” according to the Department of Energy.

Environmental groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity, have criticized the offshore oil production restart, citing risks to sensitive habitats and species. It is expected that environmental groups and state officials will continue to battle against offshore oil extraction.

Because we believe the public needs the facts, the truth, CalCoastNews has not put up a paywall because it limits readership. However, we are seeking qualification as a paper of record, which will allow us to publish public notices, this requires 5,000 paid subscribers.

Your subscription will help us to continue investigating and reporting the news.

Support CalCoastNews, subscribe today, click here.

 


Loading...
Subjects:             
Related:


10 Comments

Done selectively and with proper best practices, more offshore oil can be developed safely off California’s coast. It makes no sense for our state to import oil and processed petroleum products from Asia, South America, or the Middle East.


19

The “Center for BIOLOGICAL Diversity”, has failed to produce reasons to stop pumping out the oil that is leaking into the Channel at 10,000 gallons every day.


The pipe burst spilled 2 days worth of seepage BACK into the ocean.


The Center for Biological Diversity….isn’t very diverse.


36

Good.


30

The oil from this platform is the thick, gooey oil that our refineries are not designed to process. We are still dependent on oil imports.


-34

Actually California refineries can process this crude, and were doing so before the platforms were shut down. Easy to google this.


39

“The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.” -Ronald Reagan, 1964


Choad amongst them.


6

One would think the 61 oil refineries in California, should have consulted you first about how they can’t design a refinery for our own oil. I guess nobody at Chevron ever thought about how impossible it is…


We are dependent on imports, because the state has forced the shutdown of far too many refineries that were, despite your expertise, doing just fine making fuels and plastics.


Did you know that, during WWII, California supplied up to 18% of the WORLDS oil? Funny how no one seemed eager to close fields and refineries then…


17

Yeah; the CARB site shows as of 5-26 California is down to 11 operating refineries – 8 make transport fuel n 3 make asphalt.


Pretty pitiful compared to what we used to be; such a shame that the 1 thing CalGov seems to be good at is warring on the petroleum industry, other forms of commerce, and prosperity in general…


15

EVERYTHING DemoNcrats touch turns to feces.


The record is clear.


5

then why, knowing exactly the grade of the produced crude, would Chevron commit to buying 20,000 barrels a day from Sable to be refined at the El Segundo refinery.


7