Love letter to the NRA

April 5, 2013

Pete EvansOPINION By PETE EVANS

Recently the United Nations, those black booted thugs the neo cons hate, passed an arms control treaty (opposed by the National Rifle Association and its selfish allies) in an attempt to manage the obscene weapons traffic over international borders. This huge business has brought unimaginable terror, misery and death to countless millions of people. We have a similar situation here at home to contend with.

For 50 years I’ve watched the gun lobby, led by the NRA, undermine Congressional legislation by frantic lobbying in order to make money from the fear it foments. I have watched in horror as first our defenseless people, including lots of children, are murdered by misdirected cowards and have then seen the merciless and fallacious cowardly NRA evade all responsibility and actually blame the sane minds in government and society of attempting to subvert the constitution.

Guns are everywhere. Many guns and bullets are not regulated and much of the feeble regulation in existence is not effective or enforced. “Until 2006, the president had the power to install a director of the firearms bureau without Congressional approval. But under pressure from gun lobbyists, Congress changed the law that year to require Senate confirmation. Since then, the Senate has failed to confirm any nominee by either President Bush or Mr. Obama as senators who support gun rights have used their powers to delay nomination votes; Mr. Jones is the bureau’s fifth acting director since 2006.” This has led to disorganized regulation and crippled law enforcement.

We all know which party is primarily responsible for reducing or eliminating any safety regulation in this country; they are the darlings of the gun lobby. All the biggest (in fact almost all) donations went to right wing republicans like Bachmann and Boner, though plenty of Dems have been stampeded by the virulent NRA as well.

There is only one exact similarity at all the gun crimes, suicides and accidents in this country or any other. Guns. Only guns. Often the gun is a killing machine such as auto loader long gun or hand gun with large magazine. Sometimes the killer is crazed (whatever that means), sometimes crazy (whatever that means), sometimes just frustrated (like the fruitcake that threatened to shoot anyone who came for his guns (his license to carry was promptly revoked)), sometimes the shooter is just emotionally distraught and the opportunity for disaster was nearby in the form of a gun.

We have all heard the tired old evasions from the NRA and it’s minions-“guns don’t kill, people do.” “Only the mentally ill and criminals kill people.”  “The second Amendment is sacred and gives us the right to have any armaments we want.”

What a load of bull. The liars that spew that line of junk are counting on the public to be dupes, and idiots. I challenge any reader: where would you cut off the weapons that civilians should be able to have? .22 single shot rifle, .303 Enfield deer rifle, BAR (Browning Automatic Rifle), bushmaster (semi automatic assault rifle with large magazine), 50 cal machine gun, RPG (rifle propelled grenade launcher- great for bringing down planes), bazooka, small anti tank gun, stinger missile, small helicopter gunship (with a lovely mini/gun of course), F-16 Fighter plane, light destroyer for your bathtub pleasure, aircraft carrier, nuclear sub- what? Where do you cut off the debate on our frantic right to have (thereby lose to theft by stranger or relative) killing machines without any training, license or sense? Wait, I forgot to offer Sherman tanks or Bradley fighting machines. Did I mention a small tactical nuke to take care of that nuisance liberal down the street? How about one of those for the little lady for Xmas? So far I have not heard of anyone on the crazy side who has ever been able, or willing, to answer that simple question, they just want their guns!!!

I think the little people, with perhaps a small appendage they hope to enhance by clinging to a large gun, are just too greedy to listen to any sensible response to a society gone nuts with violence and deadly weapons. All I ever hear is ‘me, me, me’ from the gun nuts when the subject of reasonable gun control is discussed. What a bunch of babies, can’t see beyond their crummy little shortsighted horizons.

What about Gabby Giffords and the others shot to pieces in Tucson? What about all the school kids shot in all those attacks from Columbine to Newtown? The moviegoers in Colorado? What about all the people standing in line in the post offices — former historical favorite place to murder a bunch of innocents? Those who would cling to their guns with ‘their cold, dead hands’ have no conscience; they are sociopaths who have no remorse, shame or guilt.

Like so many other public debates truth has become a stranger, this has degenerated to a simple power struggle between good and evil. I can only hope that for once, good may triumph. We must discover a way to get rid of the avalanche of guns and the idiotic attitudes that have clouded our judgment.

I would like to get in a comment about our sheriff, who has recently licked the ground our local tea party fanatics walk on by pledging to not enforce any federal gun control plan. Good work, top cop! Violate your oath, become a crook in one foolish step, endanger your deputies. It has been my impression that most responsible law enforcement historically favors getting the machine guns and armor piecing ammo) off the streets so that a few more cops will survive any altercations with angry civilians.

“There is no reason that a peaceful society based on the rule of law needs its citizenry armed with 30-round [ammunition] magazines,” states Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck during a March 2, 2011 news conference.” Such magazines transform a gun “into a weapon of mass death rather than a home protection-type device,” Beck notes.) July 13, 2009—After a birthday party shootout involving a semiautomatic AK-47 in which two young people were killed and 10 wounded, Miami Police Chief John Timoney tells ABC News, “For me it’s a no-brainer. These are weapons of war. Under no circumstance do they belong in the cities of America. Now police officers are facing—and citizens are facing—these assault weapons. If we don’t stop it now, what’s it going to look like 10 years from now? Rambo becomes reality.”

I’m so glad I voted for an honest sheriff candidate, a real man, Joe Cortez.

Recently that solidly American terrorist organization, the NRA, suggested in their latest evasion of the slightest responsibility in the carnage that teachers should be trained by the NRA to carry and operate weapons (New rep). What a joke, most teachers do not want that responsibility; they are teachers, not killers. But it led me to dream up a realistic compromise in this dysfunctional debate with mental midgets. What if the NRA (in league with the gummint) trained and licensed every gun owner in the land to safely own, protect and discharge a gun in an attempt to make sure all were mentally competent and emotionally secure enough to actually handle the great responsibility? Combine that with severe penalties for anyone in possession of a gun without said license. What about that, mister hot shot, gun-toting fire breathing gun lobby? Your goods, weapons and bullets, cost us billions each year, while you make billions in profits. Its time for you to get off the corporate welfare line and start paying your way. You are just another fat cat corporate thief feeding at the public trough- pay your way or get out of the way.

The NRA is even against background checks to make sure the absolute fruitcakes/criminals don’t get guns. It opposes ANY attempt to reduce the carnage; it is adamantly against any reform of our nightmare system. It opposes any research into the ramifications of all the unregulated guns in society. The NRA should be outlawed, for it is an outlaw organization. Many NRA members are law abiding, sensible and caring citizens. Many are not. The former should quit that outlaw group and form another with a heart.

I know many respondents will try to kick me into the middle of next week. I urge the sane readers to follow the lack of logic, lack of empathy for victims, and general lunacy of the landslide of vitriol that will spew forth from others. Some will say this message is too angry, too confrontational. Tell that to the parents, children, sisters, brothers and friends of those shot up by guns in our schools, theaters, homes, office buildings and streets. Someone out there come up with answers; I did, where’s yours?


Loading...
328 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Articulate and heart-felt, but purely without merit.


Knee-jerk whiny follower group-thought drivel.


Pete you sound like a real whack job. You better be careful you might be locked up one day as a possible threat based on your anger issues.


Pete, I heard you on the radio state that you are a gun owner. If you hate guns so much why do you own them? Are you a typical do as I say not as I do liberal? If you are serious about your stance why don’t you turn your guns over to be destroyed? You may have them locked up, but that doesn’t mean that they can’t be stolen, or if you pass away you can’t control what happens to them. Put your money where your mouth is and get rid of them or STFU.


Mr. Evans,

I am glad you choose not to own a gun. You seem to have serious anger issues. You have called me, and people I love, so many names in this article I quit counting. You don’t know me. You don’t know my family. You don’t know my friends. But you arrogantly spew hate about them, and at them, because they have a different point of view than you? Your choice. But, if we have the misfortune to have a disaster here, these same people you dismissed as “little people”, “greedy”, “babies”, “sociopaths”, “evil”, “idiotic attitudes”, “killers”, “mental midgets”, will be the ones sharing their food with you, and helping you if they can. I know their hearts. Don’t know yours. Hopefully someday you regret writing this, but I won’t hold my breath.


DJ, Mr. Evans indeed degrades his (weak) argument by the use of so many pejorative terms. But that’s usually his approach.


Couldn’t help but notice Pete’s focus on little people’s appendages. What’s the matter Peter, show up a little short in that department? Well don’t despair because as my granddad used to say “it’s not how deep you plow, but rather how long you stay in the field”. Poor little peter.


Euuuuuwwwwwwwww.


Here we go again. Cal Coast News allows another half truth opinion article who’s using quotes out of context and using them as facts. Well here is one fact:


I was told to register my SKS by the State of California which many LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS did so. Oh wait says our great State of California. You now have to turn them in or face a felony charge! Never again, my family comes first before your opinion.


They asked for an inch………..you took a foot! Now your asking us to take a foot but you really will take the whole mile. No wonder why your clueless when you question the position of the NRA and ‘like’ thinkers.


Out of all the problems and deaths faced by our children every year your freaking out about a so call “asssult rifle” which took the lives of 358 +/- people each year. Another hypocrite who really doesn’t care about the bigger picture nor the heavy cost of a nation without the 2nd amendment.


Perhaps your lack of education leads you to such nonsense. I suppose you mean ‘you’re’ for you are, ‘your’ refers to something in the possession of another. Literacy matters, as well as safety.

I have never heard of any confiscation legislation, can you supply more info on that?

And you don’t need a military grade weapon to defend your family. Ask any responsible Police Chief.

I feel 358 people pretty significant, I wonder if you have lost any to the slaughters.


“Military grade weapon?” What is that? Do you mean a Fully auto M16, or a semi-auto Colt .45?

Knee jerk fear mongering. Wake up and get to the root of the problem- people, sick people are the problem, not the tools.


see http://www.hk94.com/sks-rifle.php for info on this MILITARY weapon.


look here to see real US “military grade” weapons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beretta_M9

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ka-Bar


Contrary to mass media reports, The military does not use the semi-auto AR-15, semi-auto ak-47 or any other Semiauto only long gun other than a shot gun.

People need to understand firearms before spewing trash about them. A black and “scary” looking rifle full of accesories doesnt somehow make it an evil killing machine.


What I see is a semi-auto Version of the SKS, not a “military grade” weapon.


Don’t lose your mustard! I apologize hotdog for not proofreading my ‘comments’. I didn’t realize literacy is so important to you? Your reasoning would suggest we not count all of Obama’s votes by non English speaking individuals. They are not literate, correct? They must not know what they are talking about, right? No hotdog, that would be nonsense. What happended to law abiding citizens in California was real.


Thanks slowtime for trying to educate hotdog. Obviously, hotdog has no clue when it comes to arms.


peter, go sit down and shut up………..


Pete I know that you mean well. I’ll leave it at that.


and NO I’m not willing to give up my gun or my rights to own one for my protection.


It is very obivious that Peter is a winded writer trying to lure a hard sell. It would be great if he got on the band wagon to stop the wrongful deaths on our public highways.


Off topic. Try addressing the issues discussed.


I get your concern although I do not get why we all are expected to be selective on the subject of wrongful death. Lately it has been all about guns, nothing that more laws can change, yet the same occurs on a daily basis due to simple negligence. The Highway example is well known, in fact budgeted for and something that could have been correct with money well spent. If you ever question who gets the biggest benefit from more government, just ask them, me, family members, etc. Very scary for objectivity at the voting box and why these wing nuts get so much attention on subject of guns, a one person government.


How many laws are on the books that are enforced concerning highway safety versus how many laws are on the books that are enforced that attempt to limit the number of firearms in the hands of those who have no business owning or possessing them? My point is that there a fair number of laws designed to prevent many accidents; laws against driving impaired or distracted, laws governing the use of seat belts and child seats, laws against driving reckless or speeding, driving an unsafe vehicle on public roadways; just curious though- how many new laws governing our driving habits do you wish to introduce? And as was mentioned earlier in this thread, how about enforcing the existing gun laws on the books? Oh yeah, the Republicans in Congress will not allow certain law enforcement departments to have a permanent head appointed, even during the second term of George W. Bush. Don’t you see any irony in that at all?