Is Adam Hill crying wolf?

December 24, 2015

One of the photos Adam Hill included in his emails as evidence he is under a protection order.

By KAREN VELIE

San Luis Obispo County Supervisor Adam Hill says he’s getting death threats and as a result is being protected by the sheriff’s department. Hill has sent multiple emails describing the threats and posting photos of sheriff’s department vehicles parked on a street.

But, San Luis Obispo County Sheriff’s Commander Stuart MacDonald said that the department does not have a protective order for Hill. Persons who live in the neighborhood say they have not seen any sheriff’s department vehicles in the area. And, the department is not conducting any investigation into Hill’s claims that his life and family are being threatened, MacDonald said.

Hill did not respond to multiple emails asking him to substantiate his claims about death threats or of sheriff’s department protection.

Hill sent the emails following critical media coverage and commentary about his conduct on the board of supervisors. K-Jewel (KKJL) News Director Dick Mason reported on Hill walking out on a board of supervisors 50th anniversary presentation for CAPSLO, Community Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo.

Dee Torres-Hill

Dee Torres-Hill

Hill’s wife Dee Torres was the director of CAPSLO’s homeless services. In 2013, CalCoastNews published a series of stories in which current and former CAPSLO employees said she routinely took gift cards intended for the needy and homeless and made personal use of them. CAPSLO administrators denied most of the allegations, but they admitted to questioning Torres-Hill about selling items donated to the homeless and not accounting for them.

In March 2014, CAPSLO demoted Torres-Hill and cut her pay. CAPSLO announced the move as a “restructuring” because of financial concerns. Torres sued CAPSLO alleging wrongful termination, retaliatory firing for being a whistleblower and workplace disability discrimination. That lawsuit was settled on undisclosed terms in October 2015.

Mason also questioned money that developer Gary Grossman gave to a nonprofit that Dee Torres-Hill started.

Before she left CAPSLO, Torres-Hill started the SLO Housing Connection, a nonprofit that provides homeless services that appear to duplicate many CAPSLO services, including case management, shelter and employment services. In fall 2014, Grossman made a $50,000 donation to the SLO Housing Connection as Hill aggressively attempted to persuade members of the San Luis Obispo City Council to vote in favor of a land use change that Grossman needed to develop large parcels near the airport,

Hill responded by contacting KKJL’s station manager with threats of a possible lawsuit, Mason said.

Supervisor Adam Hill

Supervisor Adam Hill

“Adam Hill contacting our station management to complain about my reporting is his prerogative, however, he’s attacking the messenger,” Mason said. “I’m only reporting the facts. His absence during CAPSLO’s 50th anniversary presentation, his threats against San Luis City Councilman Dan Carpenter, his involvement with PB Properties and his relationship with developer Gary Grossman are all newsworthy.”

Hill also sent emails to Mason directly accusing him of lying and being responsible for threats to himself and his family.

“ ‘Oh, and Dick, if you were thinking your spreading of hateful lies has no effect?’ Hill wrote. ‘Here’s the current protection outside my house, where I live with my wife and three girls.’ ”

Hills emails also blamed CalCoastNews, Dave Congalton, host of a talk show on KVEC and comments broadcast by radio station KRPL.

“You see I got another death threat stemming from lies told by the good folks at CalCoast, Congalton, and KPRL,” Hill wrote. “There are consequences to your lies. There are people out there who are stirred up and want to hurt me and my family because of the toxic garbage you all put out there. May you and your family never experience this. Shame on you.”

Mason was not present during the call that Hill made to KKJL, he said.

“For his sake, I hope his tone with my supervisor is more diplomatic and professional than the profane diatribes he emails me.”

Dick Mason

Dick Mason

Shortly after Hill called the station’s manager, a second call came in, Mason said. A person claiming to be Maggie Cox, president and CEO of the Barnett and Cox & Associates marketing and PR firm, called. The caller said she was calling on behalf of Grossman and then repeated many of Hill’s complaints, Mason said.

Cox has since said that the call did not come from her or the firm.

“No one from Barnett and Cox contacted the station,” Cox said. “It is a lie.”

Hill also accused Mason of being the voice over on a “Fire Adam Hill” video that says Hill belittles people who cross him. Mason, who said he was unaware of the video before Hill pointed it out, said the voice is not his. A search of YouTube.com turned up four “Fire Adam Hill” videos. Two of the videos appear to be criticisms of other “Fire Adam Hill” videos.

At the same time, others, including public officials, have also received calls and emails from Hill and several of his supporters claiming that the media is endangering Hill’s life and should limit its reporting to softer topics.

San Luis Obispo City Mayor Jan Marx spoke with a manager at KVEC asking that the station direct Congalton to stick with non controversial topics, Congalton said.

Dave Congalton

Dave Congalton

In another email to a local resident who does not support Hill’s reelection, Hill claims Congalton has given his address out on the air and again includes photos of sheriff vehicles he claims are there as part of a protection detail.

“This is current protection needed because of another threat against me, based on lies from CalCoast and Congalton and their accomplices,” Hill wrote. “Come by and tell them about why you spread these lies … your pal  the radio host knows the address as he broadcasts it all the time.”

Congalton has regularly questioned how Hill, on a supervisor’s salary, affords a home at the country club. However, Congalton said he has never mentioned Hill’s address on the air.

“I don’t know his address,” Congalton said.

Earlier this year, a  self-described volunteer for Hill’s reelection campaign warned KVEC management that Hill’s campaign would file a complaint with the FCC and turn advertisers away from KVEC and Dave Congalton’s talk show. The “volunteer” claimed that Congalton had made personal attacks against Hill.

In November, CalCoastNews wrote a series of stories about Hill’s moonlighting for a prominent developer. Hill refused to answer questions regarding his consulting business, his ties to developers or inconsistencies in his government filings.

Instead of answering the questions, Hill posted a statement on Facebook claiming he is being targeted by CalCoastNews on behalf of his political opponents. Hill is currently running for reelection for the District 3 seat.

Get links to local political news, like CCN on Facebook.


Loading...
208 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It might be interesting to find out who owns the house that Adam Hill rents and how much rent does he pay? Is there any conflict of interest there? Maybe not, maybe so.


Congrats Mr. Hill! You just won the 100 comments + award! Keep up the great work exposing your own blatant corruption!


Thank you “Fire Adam Hill.” You Rock! http://www.FireAdamHill.com


“Fire Adam Hill” commercials will be ran on television this year. Become active in removing Adam Hill from office. Share http://www.FireAdamHill.com with everyone.


What are the street boundaries in SLO for district 3?


Great question mej. Here is the boundary map provided by Mr. Adam Hill.

http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Assets/BOS/PDF/San+Luis+Obispo+County+District+3+Boundary+Map.pdf?method=1


Basically…..south of Marsh Strett, south of Madonna Road until you hit LOVR, and then south of Prefumo Canyon Road.


You rock Dan! Keep up the great work!


And the rest of the District is Edna, Avila, Pismo, and Grover.


Also a small portion of Arroyo Grande.


There have been a lot of, shall we say, passionate comments made on this thread. Folks less involved (like the majority of 3rd district voters) might consider some of those to border on profane or hateful. It seems to me that such comments might just fit into the Adam Hill narrative. He shares some of those with the less informed voters to make it appear that he’s a man of character standing up against extremists. Like it or not, turning the focus away from the issues and matters of character is his best, if not only, chance for reelection.


I’d like to suggest a new years resolution. If all of us can limit our comments about Adam Hill to facts, issues and events, and tone down our rhetoric, Adam would be left with nothing to hide behind. Six pages of comments which address his many failings without the harsh language would inform voters and leave him exposed and vulnerable.


It sometimes feels good to unload in times of anger but, for the good of our county, I’m hoping we can all focus on the endgame this year and resist the temptation to tell the world what we may think of him in such unvarnished terms. Let’s all address his many failings in a manner to which we would sign our names to a letter to the editor so we can inform voters.


Happy new year, everyone.


Adam Hill is a left wing extremist.


Most voters are ignorant of Adan Hill’s wacky doodle antics over the years.


There are numerous examples.


His disjointed, hate filled rant in a letter to the New Times against his opponents.


Throwing out his ex-wife’s belongings out on the street and wiping out their joint checking account.


Personally threatening Dan Carpenter.


Carrying water for Gary Grossman and his cookie cutter crappy developments which now plague the county.


Just the other day, posting an article on Facebook on how white people are racist but won’t admit to their bigotry.


Adam Hill deserves everything he’s getting. He is reaping the whirlwind right now.


Kaiser Bill says: “Adam Hill is a left wing extremist.”


Lol, Hill is a moderate centrist with some left leaning t-shirts, not even close to left wing, much less “extremist”.


The standards for such things are so low these days.


Adam Hill is a left wing social justice warrior extremist.


Hill posted this ridiculous article on Christmas Eve (not that Adam Hill cares about Christmas anyway) about how it’s hard to talk to white people about their own racism. The article was written by a “social justice professor.”


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/good-men-project/why-its-so-hard-to-talk-to-white-people-about-racism_b_7183710.html


Not to mention the screed Hill sent to the New Times a few years back where he called his opponents Ayn Rand reading morons with bad breath (I am not making that up).


But sure, Adam Hill is a “centrist.” Maybe in your world and Adam Hill’s where all white people are racist have some inherent “privilege.” But Adam Hill is far left wacky doodle out in the real world.


Adam Hill has become a parody of some bad left wing academic, not surprising since that is what he started out as.


Mike, nobody here is threatening him. He has been the one threatening others. So far, all I see is people here calling him what he is. Sticking to the “issues” as you would have us do would just get him reelected. He NEEDS to taste his own medicine and this is one way to do it, calling him out on this forum.


Very well conveyed Mike. Point taken.


Happy New Year to you and yours!


Mike you are such a fence sitter it is ridiculous. take your everyone get along attitude and go somewhere else. You never get up and speak and when you were running (?) the Jim Hill campaign you were a joke and a liar.


Don’t try to tell people what they should and shouldn’t say.


You got just one thing correct – I do like to joke.


Neither I nor any one else to my knowledge was “running” the Jim Hill campaign except Jim Hill. Many people worked very hard in many capacities to get him elected. My involvement was with an independent committee which, by law, was not affiliated with the candidate. Since you are close to Jim Hill you should know that.


Go check the log at the sheriff’s department. They were not investifating him, nor were they protecting him. I bet it was pure coincidence that they were on his street and he took advantage by taking a picture of the patrol cats.


What makes anyone say that the sheriff’s car was on his street? The photo did not satisfy me in IDing his street? Every street looks like that.


It is difficult to understand why Hill would make claims which can be disproven so easily. Does he think no one will check, or does he just assume that enough people will believe him regardless of whether or not he lies?


Are we not led as a state and a nation by people who do the very same thing? I’d say lying in politics has quite a successful track record.


Dan Carpenter won most votes in the last election in the largest city in District 3. This is the man most electable for 2016 Supervisor.


While my logical mind would say “anything” running against Hill should win by a landslide; I am also reminded to never underestimate the sickness that plagues voters here (and in this country).


I would vote for Dan Carpenter over Adam Hill any day. Then again, I’d probably vote for a brick tied to a string* over Hill.


*Simpsons reference.


Former Grover Beach Mayor Debbie Peterson for the County Supervisor District 3 seat.


Honesty, competence and diligence — Debbie is a worthy candidate that resolves the matter!


Sorry to hear that supervisorial candidate Debbie Peterson was a member of the local steering committee that formed the SLO County American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). This leftist international organization was founded many years ago by progressives to transform our Constitution.


I was surprised to hear that as well. Even more surprised when I got my local ACLU newsletter! Wow, I hope they do more of them.


FYI – I am an NRA lifetime member *and* ACLU Guardian of Liberty. I am also very conservative and dislike most republicans and democrats. So what.


The ACLU, like the NRA, are a lot bigger and more important than the silly sound-bite issues their “opposition” throws at them.


Otis, my vote is for Dan Carpenter. He is Vice Mayor of San Luis Obispo and was a top vote getter in the last city council election. The city of San Luis Obispo makes up 1/3 of the 3rd District which is a great advantage for Dan.


Dan is a man of character and we all know that character matters!


To get Adam out the right choice is Dan Carpenter for 3rd District Supervisor on June 7, 2016.


Debbie Peterson should do the right thing and drop out of the race TODAY. Zero chance of winning. Nobody home in that woman’s brain. She has a sense of self-importance that’s laughable.


I agree that either she or Carpenter needs to drop out of the race Otherwise, they are handing it to Hill.


WRONG. The primary election in June will decide which two go to November.


As long as someone doesn’t get 50% +1, correct?


NOT NECESSARILY! A candidate who gets over 50% can win the primary election outright in June!


That’s correct. But that has little to do with the assertion that two similar candidates in a 3-way primary election will split the vote, thus delivering a win to the dissimilar candidate. THIS IS SIMPLY WRONG.


A PRIMARY ELECTION eliminates one candidate. NO WAY, NO HOW can a three candidate primary race increase the chances for anyone to win outright. This is no vote split in a primary that can help one candidate get more votes. All candidates will receive FEWER votes when more candidates participate.


Peterson won’t crack 15 percent in June. She should step down now, endorse Carpenter and give the guy a real shot.


PolyProf, please explain your theory here. As offered, it makes little sense. Loser is eliminated in June, top two go to November. What’s your issue? How does a 3-way primary hurt any candidate or help any candidate?


I too would like to know how PolyProf has this clairvoyant knowledge on how the 3rd district election will play out.


As I said earlier, voters should vote for either Carpenter or Peterson. Then Hill will have the ignominy of finishing third and get a real message from the voters.


The logic in a candidate who doesn’t have the money or support to really make a showing in the primary dropping out has to do with money. I believe that with two in the race, the primary could be won wit 50% +1, thus eliminating further campaigning June – November.


The unintended consequence of a candidate dropping out before the primary could be:

The presumed top vote getter in the primary (in this case, Hill), could win in June and then between June and November facts of his wrong doing might come out. If he has already “won”, he’d need to resign or be convicted of a crime to be disqualified.


If Ms. Petersen would indeed have 15% of the primary vote, as speculated in some post, presumably her 15% would go to Carpenter. Voters currently committed to Carpenter or Petersen are aware of the malfeasance of Hill. That 15% might help put Carpenter in to the 50% +1 spot.


Elections are pretty much a throw of the dice with so many ill-informed voters. So who knows, I’m just offering my opinion.


Dems always have higher turnout in presidential election years.


So (s)Hill definitely wins if race goes to November.


Only chance is for Carpenter to knock him on his ass in June.


Peterson in the race assures a runoff.


Which assures Hill re-elected.


Isn’t it curious that Adam Hill is widely criticized here for his comments, and then most of the ‘contributions’ here confirm exactly those accusations ?


What are you trying to say? Hill is criticized for his comments and the comments here confirm what he is being criticized for? Huh? Translate please?


Your username needs a reboot.


Maybe so, but can you please answer my question? .


Adam Hill believes a halo floats above his head.


Adam believes that he is obligated to attack all PEOPLE (not what they say) that disagree with his politics.


He does not debate the principles and facts of a person’s position. He always attacks the person.


By attacking the person and their business and their ability to do business or get a project through is not the same as disagreeing with facts and the rule of law.


So Adam when you are discussed here it is about your character and values. Your character and values are for all to see as you have proudly displayed them in public as speaking out in oral communications, written communications and threats to opponents over these years you have been in office.


Since so many have been affected by your behavior over these many years publicly the subject of your character and values is exactly what should be discussed here as in


Character Matters!