SLO Tribune changes article, apologizes for defamation

July 20, 2022

By BILL LOVING

The San Luis Obispo Tribune has changed a portion of a July 17 article that libeled CalCoastNews and reporter Karen Velie. CalCoastNews and Velie demanded the retraction on July 19 after the Tribune alleged that Velie had “falsely reported” part of a story about the verbal assault that SLO County Supervisor Debbie Arnold suffered at the hands of fellow supervisors Bruce Gibson and Adam Hill.

At the prodding of KVEC radio host Dave Congalton, Arnold said Gibson and Hill cornered her in the back of an elevator in 2013 and screamed at her for disagreeing with them in a Board of Supervisors meeting. Hill sprayed her face with spittle as he screamed at her, she said. Arnold reported the incident to County Counsel Rita Neal, but was told she could not make a complaint, she said.

Gibson responded online, “What I recall of that event, which occurred more than nine years ago and lasted less than one minute, is that Mr. Hill was criticizing Ms. Arnold over a vote she had cast a few minutes before.”

“She alleges harassment and ‘bullying’ by the late Supervisor Adam Hill – and me – during a one-minute elevator ride that happened almost a decade ago,” Gibson wrote. “I don’t badger, berate or scream at anyone.”

Several hours later, Gibson chastised CalCoastNews for reporting Arnold’s allegation, even though he did not return a request to tell his side of the story.

“One other point: In the story, Arnold claimed she tried to make a formal complaint, but was denied the opportunity,” Gibson posted on Facebook. “I’ve seen no record of that attempt. CCN, per its usual ‘journalistic’ rancidity, did not verify that claim.”

Supervisor Bruce Gibson

The Tribune repeated Gibson’s allegations in its July 17 article, “SLO County Supervisor said she was bullied by colleagues. Here’s what we know.”

The Tribune article said that County Counsel Rita Neal discouraged Arnold from reporting the incident, but did not prevent her from filing a complaint. The defamatory article claimed CalCoastNews falsely reported Arnold’s quote about being told that she “could not” make a complaint because she was not a county employee, but rather an elected official.

CalCoastNews reported Arnold’s quote, that, “I was told that ‘hey, if you were an employee of the county you could complain and something might be done, but you are an elected, so get over it and get on with it.’ ”

CalCoastNews responded to the Tribune on July 19 with a demand for retraction:

“On July 17, 2022, The SLO Tribune published an article entitled “SLO County Supervisor said she was bullied by colleagues. Here’s what we know.” The story was carried in your newspaper, on your website and on social media. The article contains false and defamatory statements about us and we make a demand that you issue a retraction regarding the defamatory statement contained in that article, on paper, on your website, on social media and elsewhere.

The SLO Tribune article reads that, “In a July 12 article on the claims, Cal Coast News falsely reported that Arnold ‘reported the altercation to SLO County Counsel Rita Neal,’ but ‘Neal told her she could not make a complaint’ because she was an elected official and not an employee.” It is defamatory to write that both a reporter and her publication “falsely reported.” The CalCoastNews story was and is correct.

Supervisor Debbie Arnold

“Supervisor Debbie Arnold told reporter Karen Velie and CalCoastNews that Rita Neal told her she could not make a complaint. Supervisor Arnold has said that she made the statement and that the quoted statement in CalCoastNews is accurate. As a journalist, Karen Velie reports the news. She seeks the facts. She does not create the news by pressuring someone to change their statement.

“Not doing what the SLO Tribune and its reporter would have done in hindsight does not make the story false.

“In addition, the SLO Tribune article mixes a quote by Arnold and a statement to make the claim that Velie and CalCoastNews falsely reported the story. The statement that CalCoastNews and Karen Velie falsely reported that Arnold said she reported the altercation to Rita Neal, and was told she could not make a complaint, is not false reporting because that accurately quoted Arnold.

“The Tribune pushing Arnold to say she had the ability not to follow county counsel’s advice and file a complaint, does not make CalCoastNews’ reporting false.

“The SLO Tribune and its reporter failed to follow sound and ethical journalistic practices by not contacting reporter Karen Velie before publishing the article and calling her reporting false. Without seeking the facts from Velie, the SLO Tribune and its reporter acted in willful blindness.

“In a similar vein, the SLO Tribune article published the assertion by one of the alleged bullies, Supervisor Bruce Gibson, that the release of the story was part of a Republican Party smear campaign. That statement further libels Velie and CalCoastNews by linking them to a nonexistent Republican plot, doing so by referring to the story and then including the claim about the plot.

The SLO Tribune and its reporter could have contacted KVEC Radio Host Dave Congalton who first made the issue public. The SLO Tribune and its reporter could have asked Congalton, who is not a Republican, to confirm or deny Supervisor Gibson’s improbable statement about an alleged Republican smear campaign. Congalton has said it was his idea to ask Supervisor Arnold about the incident in the elevator and that no one contacted or prompted him to discuss the issue on KVEC. Congalton says he became aware of the incident in 2013 but was unable to persuade Supervisor Arnold to discuss it on the radio at that time.

“By this letter and in order to minimize any further damage to our professional reputations, we demand that you immediately remove the libelous statements from your websites and social media posts. We further demand that you immediately issue a retraction on the homepage of your website and on the same page and similar position that the defamatory statement was first published in your paper.”

In its response, Tribune staff wrote they regretted the error, have updated the article, and will run clarifications online and in the printed paper.

In the revised article, the Tribune claims that Arnold told two different versions of the incident.

“Arnold told The Tribune a different story,” according to the Tribune’s July 20 version of the story. “She said that Neal didn’t prevent her from filing a complaint. Instead, she said she felt generally discouraged to report the incident because she wasn’t a county employee.”

Arnold, however, says that while she could have been more careful at choosing her words, it is the same story.

Bill Loving is the editor of CalCoastNews and a former chair of the Cal Poly Journalism Department.


Loading...
23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

For years it was always the Best Buds Hill and Gibson! Remember? 2 peas in a pod.

Gibson was complicit to Hill’s actions, if not, he would have removed himself from his right hand, don’t you think? But that never happened. Not once have I ever heard Gibson reprove Hills behavior. Have you? Not once has he Denounced his close relationship to Hill, even during the days of Pay to Play? HE was there in that elevator, side by side with Hill. He did nothing to protect her. Nothing to admonish Hill’s behavior that day. HE is Just as guilty. Birds of a Feather!!


ITs too bad CCN doesn’t put their paper on paper. I wish it could be out there for everyone to see.

ITs a dis-service to SLO County that not everyone is aware of where the Truth is actually written.

After realizing how off the Fibune is…and refusing to read one word of it. I was lucky enough to find CCN. But not everyone has access, nor knows where to look.


Might be just as well that CCN stay online and not “on paper.” Could you imagine how often they would get sued if they started exposing the truth to even a wider audience? People don’t move here and pay $750k for a condo because they have (or want) a really good grasp on reality.


It may be true that the Fibune stays in business due to a long list of donors. Who ever is donating receives a story they paid for …Whom ever does not donate receives no story or a story they do not appreciate . To me that means the classifieds have moved to the front page and the front portion of the Fibune replaced the dismal classifieds section


Apologies to Ms. Arnold. She should not have had to endure this. Of course, she should have brought it to light long before this, just as Christine Blasey Ford should have immediately reported the attack on her from Brett Kavanaugh. Sad that women are considered second class citizens, even today, as the Supreme Court rolls back the rights of women to sovereignty over their own bodies.


As for Gibson, he needs to go. Hopefully, Bruce Jones will run the right campaign, touting Gibson’s recent vote for mega-raises for the county echelon, including Ms. Neal. No way she should make such a salary. Those numbers should strictly be made by the very best private attorneys. If she’s good enough, let her pursue that, instead of stealing my tax dollars for a job that can be done for much less.


Democrats are a champion for women, unless they are conservative.


Democrats are a champion for women and are not required to support conservatives at all.


Democrats supporting conservatives is like a fire department hiring a arsonist, why would they?


The Tribune is still in business???


What a circus.


After nine years, Bruce Gibson remembers the incident and how long it occurred, though he claims it was just Adam Hill complaining about a vote. It is clear this was a memorable elevator ride, and that neither Gibson nor Hill tried to deescalate the situation.


In typical fashion, Gibson spends little time on the allegation of bullying and instead tries to focus on whether county counsel said Arnold could not or should not file a complaint. It makes little difference what word was used, legal counsel was able to talk Arnold out of filing a complaint. An action that likely fueled Hill and Gibson’s continuing out of control behaviors.


When I was a reporter we would normally steer clear of “falsely,” when reporting what someone said because it wasn’t our job to make such a judgment. But nowadays it’s more common ’cause of the untruths which our former president has been constantly lobbing. So, yes, I think if we as reporters absolutely KNOW (not just suspect) that someone is lying, we COULD write it that way, but why not ‘phone or text a source on the other side to set the record straight? That was the former m.o.


You are not focused on what happened here. Even without asking Karen Velie, the Tribune reporter should have noticed Bruce Gibson’s attempt to deflect from the issue of bullying by focusing on the word choice. It doesn’t matter if Rita Neal said no or I suggest you don’t nine years ago, that does not make the reporting false. The bigger issue with journalistic integrity is the Tribune reporter parroting Bruce Gibson’s libel as truth, without considering the claim.


Well, well, well. The Tribune tries once more to besmirch Velie and her superior reporting, and again ends up with egg on their ink. This must have freaked McClatchy’s lawyers. Way to go, Karen and CCN!


What Iron Hub said.


The Trib is a sad shadow of its former self.


The Trib has been a pathologically SAD & SORRY example for many, many decades.


Well, Dan, frankly, the Tribune’s “former self” wasn’t much of anything to write home about either.


It did at one time report lots and lots of local news, which it no longer does. So your quick judgments aside, it’s had a huge, depressing decline and has dragged down our local politics with its own news corpse. Started when it ceased to be a local newspaper and went under corporate ownership. Each new owner has killed a bit more of it till now the greedy investment fund owners force T to beg for donations to pay a reporter. Sick.


How does the Trib even stay in business?