Threats, negative ads target SLO County district attorney

April 4, 2022

Tobin James Shumrick

By KAREN VELIE

Paso Robles winemaker Tobin James Shumrick has run a four-week-long series of ads targeting San Luis Obispo District Attorney Dan Dow’s reelection. Shumrick accuses Dow and SLO County Sheriff Ian Parkinson of not doing enough to protect his family, his employees and himself during six months of harassment from a neighbor, Gabriel David Canaday.

“Hey Dan Dow, Are you getting ready for your re election?” Shumrick wrote in a Feb. 22 email. “I am too you corrupt Mother Fucker. I’m looking forward to telling everyone who you really are. You’re a fucking lying criminal. We’re going to see how you like being stalked you little bitch. You better raise more money for you’re campaign you are going to need it. I’m going to make sure everyone in the county knows what a fucking coward piece of shit you are. Go fuck yourself Dan.”

Beginning on March 10, Shumrick began running weekly full page ads in the SLO New Times asking people not to vote for Dow. Shumrick is aware that no one is running against Dow, Shumrick said.

“We were not protected and I am fighting back,” Shumrick said. “This is about what the county didn’t do: They didn’t protect us.”

Starting in 2019, Canaday trespassed on Tobin James Winery property on a regular basis, Shumrick said. At times, he used his car to block employees from leaving the parking lot. Canaday also made vague threats and accused the winery of hiding or holding hostage his estranged wife and children.

Over a six-month period, the sheriff’s office received more than 30 calls for service to the winery and Canaday’s home. Some winery employees quit and others threatened to quit over the harassment.

Deputies arrested Canaday 18 times for issues with harassment and trespassing, but each time Canaday was released from jail and back at Tobin James Winery threatening staff, Shumrick said.

In some cases, prosecutors charged Canaday with violating restraining orders, all misdemeanors, in which Canaday was eventually sentenced to 180 days in jail. In March, a judge sentenced Canaday to 120 days in the county jail on a probation violation: being a felon in possession of ammunition and a stun gun. Canaday is slated to start his sentence on June 4.

Shumrick was arrested in Oct. 2019 under California Penal Code, § 246, which makes it a felony to shoot at an occupied vehicle or inhabited house. The charge was reduced to misdemeanor vandalism and Shumrick was sentenced to one day in jail.

Shumrick also accuses a sheriff’s deputy of falsifying part of the arrest report of the shooting.

Shumrick told Deputy Brent Dugan he shot at the golf cart in self defense. Shumrick shot from the driver’s side of the golf cart, which was about 10 feet away, according to the incident report.

On Oct. 10, 2019, Dugan added to his incident report for clarification, writing that Shumrick “purposely fired at the tires of the golf cart to scare Canaday…,” a supplemental Shumrick claims is falsification of a report.

“Shumrick used a shotgun, which fires multiple projectiles at one time,” Dugan writes in the supplemental report. “Due to these factors, I determined his actions were in wanton disregard for Canaday’s safety.”

A month later, on Nov. 15, 2019, an officer arrested Canaday for attempting to flee from an officer and for violently resisting arrest. Canaday was sentenced to 210 days in jail.

In his first ad, Shumrick accuses Dow of protecting law enforcement and not the public. The ad focuses on Chris McGuire, a Paso Robles officer accused of rape who Dow’s office declined to prosecute. His second ad accuses Sheriff Parkinson of lying about the death of an inmate, Andrew Holland.

Holland, a SLO County Jail inmate, 36, died in 2017 of a pulmonary embolism after being strapped in a restraint chair, with his legs and arms shackled, for more than 46 hours. He had been denied access to the county mental health facility.

Shumrick’s ads may draw the attention of the California Fair Political Practices Commission.

Even though state laws require that ad purchases related to a candidate that cost over $1,000 include the name of the party or committee which purchased the ad, the SLO New Times’ ads all say, “Paid for by a private SLO County resident.” According to a SLO New Times rate sheet, the ads run over $1,600 each.

“Clear and accurate disclosure is key to making voters aware of who is paying for political messages so they can evaluate the content and make informed decisions at the ballot box,” according to the California Fair Political Practices Commission. “In California, the true source of an independent expenditure must be disclosed and may not be hidden.”

Sign up for breaking news, alerts and updates with Cal Coast News Top Stories.


Loading...
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Anyone spending that kind of money advertising regularly in the New Times is a schmuck.


Neighborhood squabbles ALWAYS have a root cause (apologies to Kamala), which is normally some minor thing that one person thought was important but the other didn’t and thus dismissed them or disrespected them and their concerns, at least in that person’s eyes.

But just like the biggest wildfires, it starts small and can grow and mushroom until it explodes, sometimes in violence.

I think maybe the Sheriff should send someone in to mediate a solution before this turns into a true crime, movie of the week. There’s already been some gunfire and an innocent golf cart paid the price.


Agree. This a perfect case for the ‘Defund-the-Police’ social workers to show their amazing acumen in conflict resolution.


It has been said that the criminals have more rights than the victims. Then there is civil law, where money talks and BS walks. Even the wealthy want their civil issues vetted by the criminal process because they don’t want to engage in the civil process which can evolve into a spending contest. I am not a lawyer, just an experienced customer of the civil court, where thievery can be legal and rewarded by the courts. Yes we’d like to have a Daddy Dan or a Sheriff that rides up and lays down the law but that is not how it works. You can thank the best system that money can buy and the lawyers who feed your anger until until proven broke. I smell a civil issue that the property owners can waste THEIR OWN money on. I can see it now, “Schmuckrick vs Anyday”.


Wow Is This Nuts or Just me ? I do not living in the area any more, Crazy People get killed with this type of thing. I will tell you the DA’s Office after 17 years got a Contractor who owed me restitution ,Started Paying me .. The SLO DA’s Office is Getting me my $150 a month . That is one good thing they are doing ..


Tobin James does not appear to understand how the law works. They cannot just keep someone locked up because they are a mentally ill jerk. Everyone has a right to bail and the sheriff can only hold someone in jail for a lower crime for a limited amount of time. And then it can take a year for the trial and sentencing, which is also not in the prosecutors hands. A big over reaction for one day in jail.


Love this guys choice words. Free speech at its finest. Dow is such a squid boy


What a nightmare of a life. To have so much money and no peace in your life.


It sounds like Shumrick and Canaday are both very violent and mentally unstable. If those that hate Dan Dow and Sheriff Parkinson so much, hire the Progressive pot moguls the pay and buy a candidate to run against them so that our county can eventually look like say, Chicago, Baltimore, Oakland, Los Angeles or any other crime infested Progressive led city or county.


I find it interesting Shumricks’ adds and words of hate and bigotry were printed in the New Times. Hey Shumrick, you might find the the Socialist rag called the Tribune interested in some of your ill-gotten wealth with adds placed in their ten-reader failing rag of a paper.


So many reasons not to reelect Dan Dow. The corruption in this town is out of control. Justice for all escapes Dan’s realm.