School chief’s wife defends contracts with district

December 23, 2011

Julie Adams

By DANIEL BLACKBURN

Rancorous relations among factions in the Coast Unified School District (CUSD) fester after the wife of district Superintendent Chris Adams angrily and publicly derided “lies and accusations about our family that pervade our district and community and affect my daughters.”

Julie Adams made her comments in a blistering, 3,200-word email received late last week by CUSD parents and other Cambria-area residents. In it, she addressed allegations that Chris Adams has been funneling district funds to her and her father-in-law through contracts for electrical work and educational consulting.

She singled out people she believes to be responsible for “making time-consuming claims” about her and her husband at school board meetings. She said those people “are involved in PTA, Site Council, Boosters, etc….”

Also, the Adams were investigated recently by district-retained attorneys after the Adams’ children’s names showed up on a list of free lunch recipients. The form filled out by Julie Adams reported their combined monthly income to be more than $26,000, but the subsequent investigation revealed no purposeful wrongdoing.

The probe was conducted by attorney Roman Munoz of the Sacramento law firm Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard, which has represented the district since 2007.

In her tersely-worded email, Julie Adams wrote, “A small group of people who have nothing better to do on Thursday evenings, at least until karaoke starts, have made it their entertainment fodder to attend board meetings and make time-consuming claims and then perpetuate the falsities at school events or elsewhere.”

Julie Adams noted in the communication that she wrote and distributed the email without her husband’s prior knowledge or approval.

While turmoil between parents and school officials is hardly uncommon, the current atmosphere at CUSD — which one parent described as “fetid” —  may have been preordained from the start of her husband’s tenure as superintendent. Julie Adams wrote in her email, “When I moved to Cambria three years ago, many told me… to be careful in my dealings with a few people.”

Speakers at board meetings have complained that Julie Adams has been profiting from the school district through her educational consulting firm. Others pointed out that Larry’s Lighting, owned by Chris Adams’ father and located in Redding, has been receiving no-bid contract work from the CUSD since 2009.

Asked about these family-related deals, both Chris and Julie Adams referred CalCoastNews to attorney Munoz.

In response to Public Records Act requests spanning three months, Munoz eventually provided documentation showing that both Julie Adams and Larry Adams have received payments from the district.

According to those documents, Larry’s Lighting was paid $21,479.09 from 2009-2011. During the same period, payments to each of the other electrical companies previously used by the district either stopped or steadily declined after 2009.

Gary Gowdy’s company was one of those; contracts from the district for his electrical services totaled $10,787.28 during the same period but decreased to virtually zero once Larry’s Lighting made the CUSD payroll.

At one meeting in 2010, district trustees agreed they had no problem with the Adams-to-Adams arrangement, that Larry’s Lighting was “saving” them money, that his work was satisfactory, and that they did not perceive nepotism to be a factor in any way.

Julie Adams owns Adams Educational Consulting. In 2009, just months after her husband was hired as superintendent, a group called the California League of High Schools (CLHS) contracted with the CUSD to conduct a three-day “Content Area Literacy Boot Camp” and several other teachers’ seminars for $21,900.

Munoz said the services provided by Julie Adams to the district “on behalf of the California League of High Schools… are considered a ‘remote interest’ under California’s conflict of interest statute.” Therefore, he added, the district “is permitted to contract for services with… Julie Adams.”

Callers to the telephone number in Long Beach provided by CLHS are informed by recorded message that they have reached “Julie Adams with Adams Educational Consulting.”

Munoz said no additional district funds have been paid to Julie Adams or to groups associated with her or her consulting company since last year.

“Our office is informed that the district has not made payments to CLMS for consulting services since early 2010,” wrote Munoz in an email.

But despite her reluctance to talk to reporters about her district business, Julie Adams did discuss the issue… briefly… in her widely-distributed email.

“Another misconception I would like to address,” she wrote, “is that I am on the district’s payroll and that my firm, Adams Educational Consulting, has made over $100,000 in consulting fees over the past three years from Coast Unified. Not true. I have gladly donated over $40,000 to CUSD in teacher trainings, materials, instructional coaching, and curriculum development and taught a portion of summer school for free.”

Then there is the curious case of the letter to the editor that appeared in The Cambrian earlier this month, ostensibly from a man named “Pedro Garcia.”

At least, that is the name that appeared in the newspaper under a letter containing naked praise for the district’s superintendent, Chris Adams.

The letter, in part, read: “The Hispanic community respects and appreciates all that Superintendent Adams, the school board, the principals, counselors and teachers do to meet our students’ and families’ needs. Coast Unified does far more for our children than other districts our families have been a part of.”

Efforts by parents of school children in the CUSD to locate anyone in the area named “Pedro Garcia” bore no fruit. The typed and faxed letter was sent to the newspaper without an address or contact telephone number, but was published nonetheless.

The telephone number from which the fax originated was imprinted on the transmission copy: it’s a Redding number last assigned to Chris Adams.

The “Garcia letter” took to task a parent who has criticized district administration, Lee Chamberlain.

Coincidentally, Chamberlain’s name came up in the Julie Adams email, too, when she detailed what she called his “inaccuracies” in a recent newspaper opinion piece. In her email commentary, Julie Adams mentioned the very same program praised by “Pedro Garcia” in the letter to The Cambrian, ELAC/DELAC (which provides for second language parent advocacy meetings).

Document: Julie Adams  Subject: A Parent’s Perspective
JulieAdams Letter Sd


Loading...
152 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I moved to Cambria 15 years ago and I too was warned abou what it was like to live in a small town. I also felt that any possible negatives were far outweighed by the opportunity to raise my kids in a close knit community! I also learned very quickly that in a small town 10% of the parents do 90% of the work! In her recent Cambrian column, Dianne Brooke wrote about these parents, “the group”, as the backbone of our school system. The parents who “get things done”, “who bake and solicit and sell and organize and attend…” etc. Having just served with her on last years Sober Grad committee, I assumed that she spoke of myself as well as the other usual suspects we’ve had the pleasure of working with for the past 15 or so years!


Unfortunately Julie Adams has a different take on “the group”. In her email she refers to them as “This small group of people are involved in PTA, Site Council, Boosters, etc. and gossip and criticism are their primary form of entertainment.”. She later refers to “A small group of people who have nothing better to do on Thursday evenings, at least until karaoke starts, have made it their entertainment fodder to attend Board Meetings” and that these people make “time-consuming claims”.


I don’t tend to take things personally, so I don’t assume she’s only referring to me, however I do know that I am probably the only person who has ever gone to a school board meeting and then onto karaoke. I also know that in 17 years I’ve only spoken twice at a school board meeting, once against the district’s proposed drug policy and the other in favor of keeping Carol Stoner as the grammar school principal. Regardless, Coast Unified’s own bylaws state that school board meetings are not only “conducted for the purpose of accomplishing district business” but also to “provide opportunities for questions and comments by members of the public” (BB 3228 Board Bylaws).


I found many aspects of Julie’s letter distasteful! I also found it detrimental to Dianne Brooke’s plea for some new parental leadership, not to mention harmful to our community in general!


WOW, This Juilie Adams sounds like a real piece of work. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face.


I’m comfortable with her explanation of the lunches…I never believed they were trying to score free lunches for their kids. And if they were really trying to pad the numbers for the district, it would actually be better NOT to submit the form at all because then the percentage of lunch-receivers would be higher (the denominator would be smaller). But I’m not comfortable with the sketchy fax from their old number and the laughable pseudonym. And i’m not comfortable with them hiring the father to do the electrical work. He’s from Redding! That’s 430 miles from Cambria (7+ hour drive)!! That seems unreasonable and too blatant. Wondering how much Julie billed to the district where Chris worked previously. And Dad too.


I read most of Julie Adams letter as posted here, and it seems pretty reasonable and rational to me.


I don’t see any obvious impropriety in the free/reduced lunch form.


The rest seems like reasonable responses to a smoke-and-mirrors hit campaign by Cambrians with too little to do. One is pissed because he didn’t get selected to coach basketball? One is pissed because the district didn’t repay him enough for a junket his kids went on?


Seems to indicate to me that there’s not enough going on in Cambria to keep the busybodies busy.


Add: The part about the Pedro Garcia letter is a little weird. Or a lot weird.


The Pedro Garcia letter/fax is more than “a lot weird.” It completely undercuts any excuse the Adams would want us to believe about their cozy little conflict-of-interest laden arrangement.


Who in the world would trust Julie or Chris Adams after that?


I agree. This issue has people getting looking for a rope to lynch this family. To many holes in this story.


racket,


“I read most of Julie Adams letter as posted here, and it seems pretty reasonable and rational to me.”


^This is what worries the intellect of this forum!


“I don’t see any obvious impropriety in the free/reduced lunch form.”


^Again, this is what worries the intellect of this forum!


“The rest seems like reasonable responses to a smoke-and-mirrors hit campaign by Cambrians with too little to do.”


^ Assertion number one!


“One is pissed because he didn’t get selected to coach basketball?”


^ Assertion number two!


“One is pissed because the district didn’t repay him enough for a junket his kids went on?”


^Assertion number three!


“Seems to indicate to me that there’s not enough going on in Cambria to keep the busybodies busy.”


^ Last, but not least, assertion number 4!


“Add: The part about the Pedro Garcia letter is a little weird. Or a lot weird.”


^ Starting to see the light, praise!


Wait! You have the audacity of bringing up the entity of “smoke and mirrors?” LOL!!!


People who regard public service as an opportunity to funnel business to their family members have no integrity. I doubt that any resident of Cambria’s school district want the community’s children taught the values of lying, cheating and stealing. Setting up a dumby company or faxing dumby letters to the editor proves an intent to line the family pockets no matter that the example set for the District’s children is that it is clever and OK for the kids to lie, cheat and steal to get ahead.


The usualy course of conduct for a “public” servant who funnel’s business to his/her family is to also funnel public contracts to their buddy’s … for kick backs to themselves or the officeholders who keep them in the job. Broadening the investigation to see where money from other no-bid contracts are going should be considered.


Birds of a feather tend to ….


This is a blatant conflict of interest. Her position is entirely indefensible no matter how she attempts to sling back with accusations. Involving any of her family in doing business with the school district shows extremely poor judgement.


For all the folks that like to stick their nose into any free and willing rear end, complaining about 21k of contracting work over a few years is a joke. With an lighting contractor, probably at least 40% of that cost went to materials to begin with. What would be interesting would be to find out how many jobs combined to make this 21k. Do these brown nosers really think that every single job should be bid out by school districts? Yeah, right. “O.K., today bidders, we need an estimate to replace this burnt out 60 watt light bulb in the bathroom.” Usually, it is customary to get bids for jobs over 2k at least for the school district I do contract work for. Over the last few years, I have easily done 35k of non-bid work for a school district because:


#1, We do excellent work at a reasonable price.


#2 The school district has complete confidence in our work.


#3 They don’t have the time to bid out all these small menial jobs.


#4 So what if the total over a period of time adds up.


#5 The like working with us.


#6 They don’t have to get all new insurance certs every time another contractor doing the same work comes on the property.


#7 Jobs estimated to be over over 2k are usually bid out.


#8 Sorry Gary Goudy, do better work


There is another school district that gives the same work we do to another contractor because his wife is a teacher. We have asked many times to bid, but they turn us down. Sure, we don’t like it so we purposely bid low on other projects this guy bids on to get the work. It is the nature of the beast. My company has probably done close to 150k of non bid work for cities, schools, and government work in the last two years. Considering that we have only a couple of employees, that’s quite a bit. But, once again, we do great work and these entities fully trust us.


Most of the problems our country faces is because of the tolerance for unethical behavior in govt


Standups comment “It is the nature of the beast” is an illustration and by his own words he is in good standing with the players that dole out the $$$$. Why would he want things to change?


If anyone honestly thinks each and every little job should be bid out doesn’t really know too much about the time it takes to accomplish it every time. And Dex, did you and any of the other thumbs down losers fully read my post where it says they bid out jobs over 2k?


And Dexter, this is how I make my living and pay taxes. My company does a great job and I stand by our work 100%. Can someone please point out where in the article that states the other contractor actually bid himself? Yea, I thought so. He was just another no bid guy himself. Obviously most of you people have no knowledge of contracting. I have many private regular clients that give me the work without bidding. I have many contractors that are working on public projects that get an estimate from me as a sub. They don’t get a bunch of bids from subs because they know who they are working with. Same with the schools, etc. So, one of you thumbs downers, please show me where Goudy bid on all that work he did prior.


If Ms. Adams and/or her husband do not like Cambria or Cambrians, obtain your salaries from other

taxpayers.


There ya’ go: the voice of reason.


Cambria, you have a problem. This couple comes into town, and sets up a teacher training program whereby the wife is paid $22,000. Was the workshop needed in a school system that doesn’t have a lot of money. Probably not.


Then they hire the wife’s dad from outside the county to do the electrical work for the school system. This is just not done by honest people–a clear conflict of interest. I don’t care what the attorney says.


Then the fax to the district traced to their phone in Redding. Then this letter from the wife.


This couple is manipulative and dishonest. Better send them packing, or you will have to watch the money like a hawk.


“According to those documents, Larry’s Lighting was paid $21,479.09 from 2009-2011.”


“Julie Adams owns Adams Educational Consulting. In 2009, just months after her husband was hired as superintendent, a group called the California League of High Schools (CLHS) contracted with the CUSD to conduct a three-day “Content Area Literacy Boot Camp” and several other teachers’ seminars for $21,900.”

—————————

So about 40k over 3 years? And if all that went out to bid, savings of what, maybe 5k (if anything) was potentially lost?


Head nods, the jolt wakes me up, just to have head nod again. I stop fighting it. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.. Wake me up when you bumpkin Cambrians get done throwing sand at each other from the kindergarten playground.


Julie,

What meakes you think it went out to bid?


wow, your question and 5 likes–with zero dislikes pretty much says it all for you people.


The 40k of work did not go out to bid. No one ever said it did. That is the gripe that you people are making. Do you understand that? So, to understand what you Cambrians are really arguing about, you have to make a guesstimate as to what would have been saved by Cambria if the work had gone out to bid. Are we clear now? Do you understand that the amount that was spent against what should have been spent is the issue at hand? And how much is that amount?


What? You don’t even know? Do you think it could have been zero? Do you think bidding could have cost more? You don’t even know do you? I see that not one person here has even asserted how much could have been saved had the work gone out to bid let alone back up the assertion with hard evidence. Then what are you people even arguing about?


I know the district has to abide by a state set of ethics regulations, which include conflicts-of-interest regulations.


This bid/no-bid red herring is starting to smell like JulieAdamsLand, where the Adams are NEVER wrong, no matter what they do, including clear-cut acts of nepotism and fraud.


And their eager little handmaidens are ever ready to simper along behind them, making excuses for them to clean up their messes as they go.


Pedro Garcia? Isn’t that the dude from Napolean Dynamite? VOTE FOR PEDRO!