Pismo Beach Councilwoman Guthrie faces censure over building project

February 16, 2021

Pismo Beach City Councilwoman Marcia Guthrie


Pismo Beach Councilwoman Marcia Guthrie is facing censure at Tuesday’s city council meeting after she reportedly violated the Brown Act and ethics rules. Guthrie shared information from a closed session of the city council with applicants for a building project. She also issued directions to city staff regarding a project.

A city investigation revealed Guthrie contacted the applicants regarding an accessory dwelling unit on Palisade Avenue in Shell Beach to give them information from a Jan. 28 closed session meeting. The city attorney had instructed her not to speak to the applicant or their representatives about what occurred during closed session.

Guthrie’s action violated the Brown Act and the city’s code of ethics, the city concluded.

“Members shall respect the confidentiality of information concerning property, personnel or affairs of the city,” according to the code of ethics. “They shall neither disclose confidential information without proper legal authorization nor use such information to advance their personal financial or private interests.”

Guthrie also gave direction to staff regarding the proposed project in violation of the city’s municipal code and code of ethics. While the council makes policy, it is the city manager’s job to conduct the day-to-day operations of the city.

“When an individual council member gives direction, it interferes with the ability of the city manager and staff to carry out the direction of the council as a whole,” according to the staff report. “The council reviewed the code of ethics at its Jan. 19, 2021 meeting just days before the violations occurred. The behavior in question constitutes a serious transgression of the code of ethics and the municipal code and could have substantial consequences in the orderly conduct of council agenda.”

The code of ethics also outlines sanctions the council can take against officials who violate the rules, including reprimand, formal censure, loss of seniority, loss of committee assignment, or budget restrictions.

Mayor Ed Waage and Mayor Pro Tem Mary Ann Reiss are recommending the council publicly censure Guthrie by removing her from her committee assignments, prohibiting her from contacting staff regarding the project unless it has come before the council, prohibiting her from giving any direction to staff whatsoever and from representing the city in any capacity.

“The mayor and mayor pro tem do not take this matter lightly and believe that these sanctions are necessary to emphasize the serious nature of the violations,” according to the staff report penned by Waage and Reiss.

Guthrie, a local real estate broker who has served on the council since 2016, recently won reelection to a four-year term. She did not return requests for comment.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I do not see what the punishment is??? She needs to be removed from her position. This corruption needs to stop!

I wish the author of this report had given a fuller account of what the “Code of Ethics” actually is. Is it legally binding in same way, or just a nudge?

Guthrie has a long history of failing to follow the rules while she promotes real estate development or purchases for certain people while acting as an activist against projects for other people. She uses manipulation and dishonesty to get her way. What do you think the chances are that she has a financial stake in this deal. Just glad she is finally exposed. If she does not step down it is time for a recall.

Same old story. “Rules for thee and not for me”

If the allegations are true, Guthrie deserves to be removed from office, or recalled.

Not certain this is newsworthy? It’s so routine; like “stray cat crosses the street”. Just isn’t a jaw-dropping surprise in this county, if the allegations are true.

Jeopardy category: “I’ll take questionable ethics by real estate professionals for one hundred, Alex”.


So part of Guthrie’s possible censure includes “prohibiting her from contacting staff regarding the project unless it has come before the council, prohibiting her from giving any direction to staff whatsoever”, which is what she already was not supposed to do but failed at, so basically again little in the form of any meaningful consequences to a governmental official violating the rules.