Lucia Mar Unified School District needs oversight

October 6, 2024

Paul Bischoff

OPINION by PAUL BISCHOFF

The California School Boards Association states on its website: “Citizen oversight of local government is the cornerstone of democracy in the United States. School board members are locally elected public officials entrusted with governing a community’s public schools. The role of the school board is to ensure the school districts are responsive to the values, beliefs, and priorities of their communities.”

The current Lucia Mar Unified School District Board of Trustees is derelict in its duty, as it neither provides oversight, nor is it responsive to the values, beliefs, and priorities of the community.

With respect to providing financial oversight, I reviewed meeting minutes from the past two years of board meetings. Each month, an item on the agenda called “ratification of expenditures” was placed on the consent agenda (the portion of the agenda for non-controversial items, which are voted on all at once to save time). The average non-payroll costs to the district are around $3.5 million per month.

One feature of the consent agenda is that any board member is allowed to “pull” an item for discussion if he or she feels it’s merited. For the past 24 months (and probably a lot longer), no board member has ever asked a single question about a single one of the $3.5 million worth of monthly non-payroll expenditures, not even once.

With respect to curriculum oversight, in June of 2021, the staff brought the Character Strong curriculum before the board for approval. Parents argued that it contained aspects of critical race theory, and asked the board to reject it, or at least wait to approve it until more review could take place.

Don Stewart, the president of the board at the time, showed that he had failed to review the curriculum at all when he commented, “I trust the staff to vet this stuff properly.” Another board member, presumed to be Vicki Meagher, showed scorn for the parents and their concerns by whispering during the discussion, “I don’t want to cave to these people.” (The board meeting was held over remote video conference.) The controversial curriculum was approved despite parental concern.

With respect to the values, beliefs, and priorities of the community, we all saw how our district was the very last in the area to return to in-person instruction during the COVID lockdowns. Our board showed disdain and contempt to the justified requests from parents to restore normal life to our community’s kids.

During the lockdowns, we had data we could use to know returning to school was safe. Red states and Sweden showed the way (and we knew a lot earlier than they’d like to admit), but our board fearfully resisted returning to in-person learning despite the learning loss we knew would come to our kids.

Now that we are experiencing this learning loss, and seeing how our kids were affected, are we willing to reelect this current board who hasn’t even deigned to acknowledge their grave error? How confident are we that they wouldn’t do this all over again if faced with a similar situation, despite knowing what we know now? Not one of them has ever apologized for what they did to our kids.

This current board is just simply not providing oversight. The number of 6-1 and 7-0 votes is astounding. The relationship between the current board and both the teachers’ union (despite their surprising endorsement) and the classified employees’ union (which endorsed us challengers) is challenging. The relationship between the current board and the parents of our district is fractured and needs healing.

Change is required.

And that’s not to mention the subterfuge the current board used to push the Measure H bond proposal onto the ballot, and the fact that the committee promoting the bond campaign, Friends of Lucia Mar Schools, is funded (over $100,000 to date) almost entirely by the architects and contractors who would be in line to profit from the bond work…”friends” indeed. Check out our Instagram account rebuild.the.board for details about that.

The choice is clear. It’s even more clear than it usually is. My two friends, Paul Hively and Mike Fuller, and I are running against the current status quo. We propose providing oversight of our district. We propose being responsive to the values, beliefs, and priorities of our community.

The current board, especially the three incumbents, want to continue on the current path. We propose a new path. Will you join us?

Paul Bischoff is a candidate for Area 1 of the Lucia Mar School District Board of Trustees. He and his running mates Paul Hively for Area 2 and Mike Fuller for Area 4 can be found at Rebuild the Board.

 


Loading...
9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hi Paul, let’s start here…


“The current Lucia Mar Unified School District Board of Trustees is derelict in its duty, as it neither provides oversight, nor is it responsive to the values, beliefs, and priorities of the community.”


It’s pretty bold to cite something on behalf of an entire community. I am a current LMUSD parent, and I’m afraid I must disagree with you or your tired platform. I would say that others feel the same. So, no, you don’t represent “the community” as a whole. You represent a portion of the community.


I do agree that change is reasonable and necessary and that budgetary items should be more heavily scrutinized and discussed.


Your platform outlines that you don’t understand (or accept) science or history, which is precisely what is not needed on our school board. Board members should be able to come from and maintain a bipartisan space, but based on your article, you are not coming from that space.


I hope all community members will look more closely at all candidates and consider how the school district can attract and retain teachers and paraprofessionals, which it desperately needs. Without staff, the school district will fail, and it won’t matter what the board does. As a current LMUSD parent, I’d like to see the board tackle that. Invest in teachers and support staff, and stop whining over masks and hiding history.


What have I said or written that makes you believe I don’t understand or accept science & history? Specifics would be helpful


The fact that you are unaware demonstrates that you have missed CoastalLocal’s point in its entirety or that your position is shortsighted.


While I am not a fan of critical race theory, I am not going to deny that the historical record is laden with race lessons, the recognition of which can only benefit us as a society. There are extreme curriculum offerings out there, but there is nothing to demonstrate that the LMUSD Board considered such an offering and those parents who were vocal are largely recognized as having a more ultra-conservative viewpoint. If the Board chose not to act in every instance where a parent or group of parents voices their opposition, the Board would remain at a constant impasse which is far more harmful to the students.


As far as the late(r) opening of the schools following the pandemic, it is easy for you to stand on a soapbox and, in hindsight, stake your grand position as to what should have happened at the time. The Board, like every school board, was dealing with a once in a lifetime event. Sure there was evidence to support opening the schools – but you fail to recognize that there was also evidence to support keeping the doors closed. Some districts took a more aggressive tact to open and, again in hindsight, that worked for them. However, had the pandemic trended another direction, such an aggressive tact could have resulted in many more sick or worse. The Board was dealing with a unique event and no one at the time, knew the correct response. A more professional viewpoint would have been to recognize the Board’s challenges at the time and offer your position that you may have done it differently – but there is no way – absolutely no way – to determine whether you would have in fact done so. You can be an advocate for your position while simultaneously being courteous and professional.


Thank you for your time and well-written reply. I echo your comment and more. As a parent who had two children in school during the pandemic, I understand firsthand how challenging it was. What strikes me as ironic is that the “faith over fear” crowd wanted schools open but couldn’t (or wouldn’t) take some time to dive into (accurate) history and absolutely fear CRT. While I feel like Paul means well and is very passionate about making good change, his knowledge of today’s educational challenges is antiquated and very partisan. It is a push in the wrong direction.


More political whining. Sigh.


Don’t you send your kids to private school?.


What the school board doesn’t need is a person who intends to ban books such as Bischoff. You keeping your homophobia in check Paul? Looking forward to you losing


Thank you for the opportunity to share the details…


https://www.paulforschoolboard.com/book-banning


It’s not the school board Paul, it’s your superintendent. You’ve got yourself a bona fide ladder climber. Right now Lucia Mar is hiring an area administrator. One job qualification is 3 years successful teaching experience. According to his Linkdin page your superintendent taught 1 year in San Ardo, 1 in Paso, then he taught yearbook and computers for three years. Superintendent Fawcett is barely qualified for an entry level admin job in his own district. I bet he’s never had a class take the state test. In the last 8 years this guy has been a highschool principal, a director of special education, asst. superintendent of human Resources and superintendent. He’s a hack looking for a high paying job in the area he went to college. School boards are just lay people with an agenda, the superintendent presents the change and leads the district.