Sanitation district wiped away records, audit finds

August 18, 2015
John Wallace

John Wallace

By JOSH FRIEDMAN

Four and a half years of accounting data were wiped away from South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District computers under the leadership of John Wallace, a former IRS investigator alleges.

In May, the sanitation district board hired Carl Knudson,  a former special agent who investigated city government malfeasance, to pursue a financial and managerial audit of the district under Wallace’s management. Last week, Knudson released his initial findings in a letter to District Manager Richard Sweet.

Knudson, whose bio also includes stints with Naval Intelligence and the CIA, did not divulge any spending anomalies in his initial report. But, he stated his team has reviewed and examined a number of vendor files pertaining to alleged purchasing irregularities.

Thus far, the audit has uncovered a pattern of records disappearing or being destroyed. In addition, Wallace appears to be obstructing the audit, according to Knudson’s initial report.

Knudson released an estimate that the sanitation district paid Wallace and his engineering firm, the Wallace Group, more than $5 million from 2004 through 2013. Until he resigned as plant administrator in 2013,  Wallace and the Wallace Group were billing the sanitation district $50,000 to $80,000 a month for a variety of services.

Based on available evidence, Knudson determined the sanitation district had paid Wallace and the Wallace Group $3.4 million from July 2008 to June 2013. Digital account records of the previous 4.5 years were wiped away, the investigator stated.

“The computerized accounting for the years 2004 to July 2008 were not available and had been wiped clean when the plant switched to QuickBooks,” Knudson wrote.

Knudson’s letter also alleges the Wallace Group has purged physical copies of plant records. While he served as plant administrator, Wallace kept many sanitation district files at the Wallace Group office in San Luis Obispo.sewer

“We have learned that some records stored at the Wallace Group were ‘purged,’ but we don’t know what records were ‘purged’ since Wallace didn’t provide a list,” Knudson wrote.

So far, Knudson’s team has examined 56 boxes of plant records provided by Wallace, according to the progress report. Some of the records in the boxes were confidential personnel files which contained grievances filed against Wallace by a number of plant employees, Knudson stated.

Under Wallace’s administration, former staffers at the plant said the company from which Wallace purchased chlorine also provided top management perks, such as inclusion in a yearly boar hunting trip.

Knudson additionally stated he is having difficulty interviewing people associated with the Wallace Group.

Knudson said in the letter he requested to interview Heather Billing, a Wallace Group engineer. John Wallace responded to the request by saying she is on a sabbatical and may be back in September or October, Kundson stated.

“At this point, I’m not sure whether any of the Wallace people will be available,” Knudson wrote.

John Wallace did agree to be interviewed. But, he is including his attorney and an expert in government finances, according to Knudson’s letter.

Wallace also granted Knudson permission to interview Mike Seitz, who formerly served as the district’s attorney and worked as a lawyer for the Wallace Group.

For several years, the sanitation district board voted against conducting an audit. The board reversed its position in January and initially allotted $40,000 for an audit.

In Knudson’s progress report, the investigator requested an additional 150 hours, at the cost of $22,500, to complete the audit of the past 12 years of district fiances. Knudson said the complexity and scope of the audit have increased.

If the sanitation district board grants the request, the cost of the audit will increase from $55,000 to $77,500.

On Wednesday, the sanitation board will decide whether to grant Knudson the additional funds he is requesting. A district staff report states the request for additional funding is unexpected, but there are funds available.

In 2013, Wallace resigned as district general manager amid allegations of mismanagement. Since Wallace’s departure, the sanitation district’s wastewater treatment plant has been operating cleaner and at less than 50 percent of the prior cost. In particular, chemical costs have decreased from about $600,000 a year to $240,000 a year, district staff have said.

Get local news first, like CCN on Facebook.

 


Loading...
46 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Oh my. Where to begin.


I can see where Mbbizpro is coming from regarding record keeping. How long is the Sanitation District required to keep the records? What are our sanitation district’s policies and procedures?


I am disturbed by the fact that he was taking confidential records home, giving special perks to people he had business arrangements with or bought chorine from. I am disturbed he “purged” records. Which ones?


Why were costs so expensive under Wallace’s management? Can he in ANY way attempt to justify it?


I am not a person of embellished words. I am an everyday person, just like most Central coast taxpayers. I pay taxes every single year. Every dollar I earn, every dollar I spend gets taxed and in some way accounted for. If I write off a deduction, I had BETTER keep my receipts and records, or I run the risk of getting burned if it is my turn for audit. For someone like me, it isn’t a problem. Recordkeeping is something pretty basic, and I don’t get paid 80k a month.


Which brings me to my point. When we pay the fortunate few 20k, 50k, 80k and more a month to be our civil servant, aren’t they getting paid because they are “talented”? They are super smart and fancy-like, so unlike us simple folk I reckon. So, why do they seem so unable to manage the basic life skill of paperwork, and why do our District attorneys, etc choose not to pursue their prosecution?


If this audit concludes that Wallace and his companie misappropriated funds, I would like the citizens to sue him individually and his “corporation”.


Lastly, we will take our poorest, disadvantaged residents and we will prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law for writing a bad check, etc. I am not saying we SHOULDN’T. I am saying that law is law, and fair is fair. Our poor might not know better, and for what Wallace was making, I will not ever entertain any excuse he has.


Wallace has been so corrupt in this County for so long that it is just a given. Almost every government agency with water/wastewater agencies have used his services and been overcharged because he knows how to shake hands and leave a token. This man and his firm along with Seitz (attorney) have taken from the taxpayers of this County for so long I am sure they can retire. Come on, people in power knew this was happening but they were good with it because his “studies” gave the agency what they wanted to present to the public for upgrades and in return he got some great contracts. Lots of handshakes go only daily in this County. Look what happen this week with the BOS of approving another tax for the Paso Robles Water Basin. Thank’s Frank Mecham, and I am glad to know that you knew you could not win another election. You are smarter then Adam Hill but just as corrupt!


Believe what you want naysayers, fact is Wallace billed somewhere between $5,000,000 and $8.400,000 in a 9 years. Id like one of you to give us a legitimate and realistic account what it bought us,the tax payers. How much has Avila CSD been screwed out of, or any of the other numerous municipalities he still manages or managed?


If the final findings of the audit prove without a doubt Wallace and others colluded to defraud the taxpayers it doesn’t mean a damn thing unless the District Attorney prosecutes.


Then again, I guess the South San District could sue those responsible for malfeasance and then watch the attorneys on both sides make another fortune on this debacle while taking years!


John Wallace has been doing this for years at multiple districts and is very very well connected. I highly doubt, given the level of government corruption as a whole in this county, nothing much will happen to TEFLON JOHN.


No surprise then that Ferrara has sold his house and likely hid the money he made and the talk is he moved out of the area to make it harder to track him down and harder to find any of the money.


Anyone see a pattern here with regard to the way Wallace does business?


Is it unusual for records that exceed 7 years old and were on outdated computer servers to be purged? What did the agreement call for when Wallace was hired? Had the time limit for retention of records past? Had the city had their financial team and perhaps city attorney review them prior? What were the findings of those reviews? If there was no system in place for review, that is the fault of the city. Is it also possible that the city has/had the records or were given the opportunity to have them prior to purging? Why aren’t any of these questions answered before the rush to judgment article?


Again, have you seen the agreement or are you assuming?


And your statement appears to be totally incorrect. This is for the City of San Jose which I was able to most quickly find. Records can be required to be retained for periods of between 2 years and permanent. Nice try though. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11820


In addition, are you certain that the records were not purged because they were turned over to the city?


Turned over to what city? Why would they be turned over to any city?

The Sanitation District is it’s own governmental entity. The records belong to the Sanitation District.

The real question is why did the Sanitation District feel they had to pay $20,000 to have the files gutted and purged before being returned as many as 8 months AFTER Wallace resigned as administrator? The Board should have been hip to those charges and told him “hell no”.


I misspoke by stating city,but, each city and Oceano have representation on the board. If there were indications of malfeasance, to protect their interest, each member “City” could have and should have had their City Attorney involved. There were numerous mentions regarding the former mayor leading to my comments about the city.


Again, the Sanitation District is its own entity. The member agencies would/should not investigate the San Dist. The funds in each agency are their own and there’s no nexus to the San Dist funds, only the ratepayers are the same. The ratepayers need to be represented and last night was a disappointment to watch Mary Lucey and Barbara Nicolls punted the discussion to advance $22,500 to the investigator for two weeks until the appointed Board members, Shoals and Guerrero, can be there.


The records belong to the district, not the city.


Again mbbizpro rushes to judgment.


mbbizpro says:”Had the city had their financial team …….”


What city, Wallace ran the district, billed the district and held all of the records.


“the rush to judgment article?” Who is judging now? Wallace has a long history, check into it before your “rush to judgment” or are you a buddy of JW?


Oh, the old accusation of some special interest. How clever. If they are city records there are guidelines. If they are private records of Wallace he is governed by either his agreement with the city or by the requirements under his licensing with the State. I could be wrong about it, but, it should be addressed in the article. If it isn’t, I assume that the questions were not asked, as they should have been. The City has the right and obligation to audit the records and if they did so, they should have retained them.


Did you read the other 80 articles about the SCSD? it cover much of what you think should be this article.


It is clear that thou doth protest too much and have a interest of some sort.


I am in favor, procedures and checks and balances. If the city failed to do so that is an issue to be addressed with the City Treasurer, City Attorney, and City Manager. Again, the agreement between the City and Wallace and the requirements by the Licensing Board that licenses Wallace if the retention was failed to be spelled out in the agreement apply.


The article also states that digital records were wiped away. Does that mean that paper records exist and meet the requirement? Again, rush to judgment.


Are you aware that this just happened and more information is forthcoming?

Are you aware that because of this audit, only now do we know more of the missing records?

Are you aware that if every article had every detail, each one would be 20 pages long.

Have you read the other 80 articles about this issue, some of which have details you keep asking for?


We are not going to spoon feed you info, read it yourself.


Again mbbizpro rushes to judgment.


What city are you referring to?

Wallace worked for the District–comprised of Grover, AG and Oceano.


It seems like the comments are directed at his relationship with Ferrara, thus, I referred to the city. Pardon my lack of clarifying this. My point is the same, the district has people that oversee these items, legally binding agreements, policies about record retention and more. The cities served by the water district also have oversight capabilities. http://sslocsd.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=20&Itemid=148


The District should have it’s own records retention policies.


” the district has people that oversee these items, legally binding agreements, policies about record retention and more.”


Yes John Wallace was running the district, this is one of the many reasons there is a audit now.


Tomorrow night’s meeting should be interesting…

With Mayor Shoals out for a while, will his alternate Barbara Nicolls vote to approve the additional $$ to continue the investigation? Or, because her husband served on the board with Ferrara and voted in lock-step, will she vote to throw in the towel?

Who shows up for Oceano? Will it be reluctant Guerrero or the always unpredictable Lucey?

One thing’s for sure, it’ll definitely be worth the price of admission to hear what Knudsen has to say.


Thank you Mayor Debbie Peterson for recognizing what was going on and beginning the battle for this audit. Thank you Mayor Jim Hill for following through to make the audit reality. You both went way out on a limb to clean up that corrupt mess and, in Mayor Peterson’s case, paid the political price for diligently serving the residents of the south county. I wish we had more public officials willing to stand their ground against powerful people who reward their friends and punish their enemies.


There are some important elections coming up next year and I hope CCN will report on each candidate’s campaign contribution filings and statements of economic interest so we may know who is giving money to whom.


It appears the money spent on the investigation is money well spent.


Those who have followed the district for years knew there was something going on, yet under AG former Mayor Ferrara there was no hope of an investigation.

Thank you Mayor Hill for pushing the board for transparency.

The ratepayers of the district are long overdue for an explanation as to what really happened, the numbers won’t lie.

I certainly hope Mr. Knudsen is able to bring forth enough evidence of wrongdoing for the DA to prosecute Mr. Wallace and anyone else involved in his rip-off of the Sanitation District ratepayers.


Perhaps some of the other districts who currently use Wallace Engineering will take a second look at their expenses and an ever closer look at just how Wallace operates, and learn something from what happened at the SSLOCSD under Wallace’s reign.


Ditto to everything justbeware states above.


I encourage the board to approve the additional hours. I am impressed with how detailed the findings are to date, and can only imagine what a thorough investigative report we will receive from Mr. Knudson.


If the board does NOT approve this extra expense at Wednesday’s meeting, I would suggest that the District Attorney investigate this board AND past boards. Mr. Sweet states the funds are there, and it is a small amount to pay after the millions lost to the rate holders to date. If not approved, I have to ask, “what are you afraid he may find?”


Finally, we may see justice being served!


Sounds as though Wallace may have a future in presidential politics.


Just remember Wallace’s history. He started out as a functionary in the county engineering department, where he was regarded by many as being excessively oleaginous. But it was a handy position — he made all sorts of contacts with Important People in the private sector. Then he cashed out, set up his own firm, and has made millions since using those contacts he made while a “public servant.” Sad story. Not typical, but commonplace nonetheless.


Your history is correct with one exception….Wallace was setting up his own firm before he cashed out from the county.

I know because I was at a prejob conference that Wallace attended with the intentions of bidding on as a consultant while he was still employed by the county.

There are several older civil engineers still working in the county that will back that up.