Feasibility of Oceano Dunes emissions reduction mandate questioned

March 12, 2019

California State Parks is raising questions about the feasibility and affordability of a settlement agreement it reached with the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District last year that calls for an approximately 50 percent reduction in emissions from the Oceano Dunes off-road riding area. [Cal Coast Times]

For years, the APCD and Nipomo Mesa residents have clashed with state parks and off-road vehicle riders over Oceano Dunes dust flows. In 2011, the air district adopted the Oceano Dunes dust rule, which requires state parks to reduce the amount of particulate matter blowing from the dunes off-road riding area or face fines of $1,000 per day.

In adopting the regulation, the APCD relied on contested studies that concluded off-road vehicles on the dunes were causing pollution on the Nipomo Mesa. Despite mounting evidence indicating the APCD used flawed science, the air district deemed the Oceano Dunes off-road riding area a public nuisance, forcing state parks to agree to measures aimed at reducing dust flows in order to avoid fines.

Last April, state parks and the APCD reached an agreement calling for the closure of portions of the Oceano Dunes to off-road vehicles and the creation of islands of vegetation within the park, even though there were already dozens of acres of fenced vegetation on the dunes. The agreement initially sought to reduce emissions from the dunes by 30 percent, but the APCD hearing board rejected the deal, and only approved the agreement once the emissions reduction target was raised to 50 percent.

As required by the agreement, state parks recently prepared a particulate matter reduction plan that discusses reducing emissions over an approximately four-year period spanning 2019-023. The plan, however, states the dust control measures required in state parks’ settlement agreement with the APCD are unprecedented and questions whether the mandates are feasible.

“At this time, it is uncertain if this magnitude of dust control at Oceano Dunes SVRA is feasible from an economic and logistical standpoint,” the state parks particulate matter reduction plan says.

State parks’ analysis indicates that implementing a total of 500 acres of dust control measures on the dunes, largely consisting of planting new vegetation, would still make it unlikely that the agency would achieve the objective of reducing emissions by 50 percent. The state parks report says 500 acres of dust control measures, including approximately 132 acres of existing controls, would likely reduce emissions by between 31.6 percent and 50 percent.

The cost of planting vegetation on approximately 413 acres, as would be needed to establish 500 acres of dust controls, would cost between $6.2 million and $8.3 million, according to the state parks report.

Additionally, such measures would “significantly diminish the iconic recreational opportunity” that Oceano Dunes off-road riding area provides. The dust control measures would require substantial reductions in camping and recreational capacity, state parks says in the report.

APCD chief Gary Willey responded to the emissions reduction plan in a letter to state parks saying the agency’s assertion that it cannot comply with the settlement agreement is not acceptable.

“The district believes that compliance is possible and that is supported by last year’s measured PM10 reductions which greatly exceeded expected reductions from fencing that occurred,” Willey wrote in the letter to state parks.

Willey is demanding that state parks make changes to its emissions reduction plan by March 22. A workshop on the emissions reduction plan is scheduled for May 1.


Loading...

5
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
rukidding

I went to the dunes for the first time about 60 years ago. Nothing has really changed at the dunes. Mother nature is still blowing the sand in the air but the clams are gone. So what really has happened is that people have invaded the surrounding areas of the dunes and have changed that. And the otter’s have taken the clams. The generations of folks who have used the dunes way before the residential invaders have not changed anything. Once again we have two government agencies bleeding the taxpayers and citizens for a power struggle. The conditions at the dunes have been there for decades and will continue to be there for decades ahead. One basic study that they have not addressed yet is that you can’t beat Mother Nature.


what the

Remember when Larry Allen from the APCD and Adam Hill got into a pissing match with Steven Hayward and FORBES magazine? Hayward spanks them both in FORBES. See article here:


https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenhayward/2014/01/20/bureaucracy-in-america-now-goes-all-the-way-down/#1c4f08a0b1c0


what the
GoneFlyFishing

Hill-arious.


Boldguy

What a mess, one governmental agency attacking another:(

Where’s the coastal Commission in this debacle,pushing the mandate that was voted on, maintaining recreational opportunities for all Californians, not!!!