League of California Cities seeks Public Records Act suspension

April 1, 2020

The League of California Cities asked Gov. Gavin Newsom last week to partially suspend the state’s Public Records Act, a move that has drawn rebuke from transparency and press freedom organizations. [Press Democrat]

California’s Public Records Act requires agencies to respond to record requests within 10 days. The League of California Cities, which represents nearly 500 cities, including all seven in San Luis Obispo County, is asking the state to allow public agencies to delay their responses to record requests.

League spokeswoman Kayla Woods said the proposed delay would not apply to records created during and related to the coronavirus crisis. The organization is not seeking to suspend all public record requests but wants cities to have flexibility if decreased staffing or closure of certain facilities is impeding their ability to respond on time, Woods said.

“Cities have varying levels of staffing and resources, and are focusing nearly all of their efforts on responding to this public health crisis,” Woods stated in an email.

The League of Cities requested that Newsom suspend numerous laws or parts of laws, not just the Public Records Act.

Newsom has already temporarily suspended parts of California’s open meeting laws, allowing boards and commissions to meet and vote by teleconference and exempting rules allowing members of the public to address governmental bodies in person.

Likewise, some local government agencies have already attempted to suspend transparency laws. The mayor of San Francisco suspended the city’s Sunshine Law, and the Fresno City Council voted to suspend the entire California Public Records Act.

In Sonoma County, a Santa Rosa Press-Democrat reporter submitted a request for emails related to the coronavirus response. A Sonoma County official responded, “the public’s interest is not served by diverting staff resources away from essential emergency response work to immediately respond to records requests.”

Later, a county attorney said officials would process such requests when normal business resumes.

Among other rules the League is requesting be rolled back, the organization is asking that the state suspend a law requiring public officials to file statements of economic interest and to pay fees for late submissions. The law is considered a key component of the effort to reveal public officials’ conflicts of interest should they arise.

Last week, the First Amendment Coalition and press freedom groups released a joint statement condemning public officials’ attempts to sidestep the California Public Records Act.

“The public’s right of access remains and is crucial in times of crisis. Just as the government’s power is at its apex during a crisis, the importance of the public’s right to know how their government is wielding that power could not be greater,” the statement says. “The First Amendment Coalition and the undersigned groups therefore condemn moves by some government entities to abandon their obligations under the California Public Records Act and the California Constitution, and we strongly urge them to reconsider.”

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Just as when government entities announce cuts they often avoid cuts to administration and upper management, one would think if The League needs to conserve resources there are other areas that can be eliminated or cut and not start with an area that helps keep cities transparent and on the up and up.

Well, this is the first word that I’ve seen from the League of California Cities as our entire state struggles to stay afloat in the pending financial tsunami that is about to strike.

Right now- this very moment- all the cities in California are preparing their budgets for the 2020-21 fiscal year. It is already clear that the Corona Virus situation is going to devastate the revenues of the current 2019-20 fiscal year for most (if not all) municipalities and dramatically reduce the estimated budget revenues for the next fiscal year. This will require massive reductions in the budgeted expenditures of municipalities. And, because the single-biggest expenditure for virtually every municipality is salaries and benefits, that’s precisely where the budgeted expenditures for the 2020-21 fiscal year are going to have to come from.

That will necessitate massive personnel layoffs, terminations and cutbacks.

So, here’s an idea: If the LCC truly wants to take some action to proactively address the coming Municipal Budget Bomb that is going to hit in the next two months, how about the LCC announce that ALL its elected city council members statewide will IMMEDIATELY cease taking ANY salary payment for their SERVICE and reduce and/or completely eliminate any and all benefits that are paid by their city’s municipal budget.

Further, how about the LCC recommend that all their member cities IMMEDIATELY reduce current administrative/management salaries by 50% or some other such necessary figure, or, better yet, place a salary cap of $100,000 on all administrative/management positions, freeze hiring to fill any current personnel vacancies, and place a salary cap of $100,000 on ALL public employee positions until further notice. Then, once those cost savings are calculated, THEN the city councils can consider further necessary staff/personnel cutbacks.

So, League of California Cities, I herewith challenge you to take this, or some similarly proactive effective, action to address this coming Municipal Budget Bomb in your member cities statewide.

LOL, massive budget cuts. now thats funny. in every city and county in the state right now, i’d bet a big corona tax on land, sales and income is being formulated.

Haha you wish.

It seems that building permits have been suspended because there is very limited enforcement. Then again new crap for the neighbors to view will eventually equal new tax dollars to fund guess who’s pensions, now we know what is really important? Maybe we can take a vote to decide what else can be suspended.