Has Gov. Gavin Newsom gone too far?

May 10, 2020

Gov. Gavin Newsom

OPINION by T.KEITH GURNEE

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s power has seemingly gone to his head. His responses to two primary issues—the COVID-19 pandemic and California’s housing struggles — reveals he’s gone too far and it just may undo his administration. Newsom’s willingness to impose top-down, one-size-fits-all mandates upon all of California’s local governments and residents is telling. Let’s just focus on the coronavirus.

First, give Newsom some credit. Newsom’s early actions to confront the coronavirus were far better than New York Gov. Andrew Coumo’s. Newsom acted quickly, Cuomo reacted late. Cuomo’s decision forcing infected patients into rest homes condemned thousands of elderly New Yorkers to death. The much lower rates of infection and deaths in California have verified that Newsom initially performed far better than Cuomo.

However, since Newsom’s coronavirus lockdown order issued on March 4, his performance has been marked by increasingly autocratic heavy-handed dictates and secretive decisions that are weighing down all Californians. The consequences of Newsom’s latest actions are starting to look worse than the disease. Consider Newsom’s actions:

1. According to the Los Angeles Times, Newsom’s administration unilaterally entered into a number of secretive no-bid contracts with questionable contractors. As a result:

  • Newsom awarded over 80 non-competitive no-bid contracts totaling $3.7 billion right after his March 4, 2020 lockdown order.
  • Newsom’s administration executed a no-bid contract with the Chinese firm BYD for nearly $1 billion to deliver 200 million N-95 masks by May 2. Yet only 10 million masks, or only 5% of the masks ordered, were delivered by that date. BYD is on the hook to reimburse California for less than 25% of taxpayer funds wasted on that contract.
  • It also approved a $800 million no-bid contract with Alabama-based Bear Mountain Development Co. LLC for 400 million surgical masks and 200 million face shields. While they were supposed to deliver 60 million face shields and 120 million masks by May 2, less than 500,000 face shields (1/4%) and 6.7 million surgical masks (1.7%) ordered were received by that deadline.
  • These actions not only cost California taxpayers millions of dollars but also cost valuable time in responding to the needs to fight the coronavirus.
  • Instead of a foreign contractor like BYD, why couldn’t California have gone to American firms like 3M or Honeywell who are major producers of such equipment? BYD’s costs per mask was $3.30, but Honeywell delivered masks to Los Angeles for just $0.79 per mask.
  • Despite the best efforts of the LA Times to obtain details on Newsom’s no-bid contracts, the administration has refused to comply. Given what’s been discovered, perhaps one can understand Newsom’s attempted cover-up.

2. With the economic hit taken by job losses and small businesses, Californian’s are increasingly anxious about lifting restrictions and returning to work. The resultant economic stagnation has wiped out California’s budget surplus and placed the state and its cities and counties in dire straits. Yet Newsom persists on imposing his dictates on cities and counties, refusing to allow them to open regardless of their infection rates.

3. On April 30, Newsom ordered Orange County to close all beaches, incurring the wrath of the county, beachgoers, and surfers from Huntington Beach– California’s iconic “Surf City USA.”

4. Of California’s 58 counties, the LA Times found that there are 24 sparsely-populated counties in Northern California that meet all of Newsom’s standards for reopening. Yet Newsom refuses to let them.

5. On May 7, Modoc, Yuba, and Sutter counties announced they were ready to open subject to advisories to citizens. Two days later, Newsom threatened to punish those counties by withholding disaster relief funding and weaponizing the ABC to revoke liquor licenses. Modoc County, with zero reported infections, opened while urging those infected or over 65 years to continue staying in-place. Yuba and Sutter counties opened but limited the number of people inside businesses, requiring social distancing, wearing masks, and using hand sanitizers. Yet Newsom remains determined to punish them.

Here in San Luis Obispo County, we’ve had 214 cases of coronavirus with only one death that occurred well over a month ago. Shouldn’t we be opening sooner rather than later?

California needs to get back to work, our businesses need to reopen, and we need to renew economic activity necessary to generate revenues, not only for business owners and workers, but for the essential services provided by state and local government. Instead of Newsom’s imposing his dictums on every corner of California, he should open areas like ours and others that are performing well against the virus now.

Unfortunately, Newsom’s original response to the coronavirus seems to have morphed into an emboldened power trip. Gov. Newsom, it’s time to park your ego at the door and get California moving again.


Loading...
charles

Let’s take a moment and really consider what people are actually doing with all of this talk about our government “doing more” in regard to ensuring our safety. Just so I can understand the rationale of this idea, there are actually people out there that believe that the best way to ensure their safety from a virus Is to:

Immediately surrender the rights guaranteed by the constitution. Rights that may not be taken without due process, or without just compensation. To agree, without question, to abide by guidelines instituted by an elected governor, which is the executive branch of our government, a branch of government that is prohibited from enacting laws, and accepts the idea that in not conforming to these guidelines, that the governor may then use the full force of our government to enforce the guidelines through fines, and threats of incarceration if not followed.

Executive orders that have absolutely no basis of how they came to be, no evidence that they will even be effective, no explanation of how essential versus non essential businesses were determined, no ability to challenge the reasoning behind any of the orders at all. And, none of this has even entered the consciousness of social discourse or debate?

Help me understand what I am missing here, please, because I just can’t understand why anyone would even entertain the idea of following the direction of our government when the first thing it does is strip us of our rights? Stop for a second and just consider the track record of our government in terms of its success in executing any policy it has ever attempted to execute. Seriously? Has our government ever been shown to disseminate accurate data in real time? Has our government ever actually Not lied to us? Haven’t we learned yet? Hasn’t everything ever done by the government turned out to be a complete disaster after all of the dust settles and the truth trickles out years later? But, maybe it’s me? Maybe I’m too misinformed about every significant event in our history where the government handled the situation at hand. I’m sorry, but, it’s hard for me to buy in to the hype when I look at the track record. But hey, if you want to buy in to the guidelines and advice of politicians with a record of what?// 0 and 400, then by all means, go for it. But you don’t get to make me do the same, so surrender your rights, but I’m keeping mine, sorry. People never learn…

And just for the record…the masks being worn…all worn wrong. Improperly fitted, constantly being touched with bare hands over and over, same masks being worn day after day, put on incorrectly, removed incorrectly, and if you don’t believe this, just take a little time to research it, because anyone with proper PPE training should know just how pointless it is to wear masks without following the proper manner that masks are worn in the first place. It’s absurd, and ridiculous that people would prevent the spread of a virus by how they wear the masks. If the virus were really as deadly and contagious as they try to sell us it is, you would all be dead because of how the masks are worn. Coughing into a bandana open on the sides, prevents direct frontal projection of the cough itself, but everything else gets covered in the crap expelled, so GOOD JOB with your face covering.


Rambunctious

The reports of upticks in new cases after reopening are grossly misreported all around the world…the new cases would have occurred regardless….it will take a month to confirm that any new cases are due to relaxed mandates…..but of course the media needs them to be due to opening back up….so that is what they tell you….there is to be no comparison between the news and the truth between now and November 3rd….none whats so ever…..


surf dog 805

So many people drank the Kool-Aid. The A hole the makes a comment about me chosing not to wear a mask at Home Depot? First off this may be the first time you have ever been there but now you are furloughed and your other half wants you to replace a lightbulb without the help of the furloughed help? Shut up, put on your masks if you’re scared or stay home. Don’t worry we aren’t coming to your home unless you need someone to change that lightbulb. I will help if need be. Maybe you could take a trip to your beach house as I do the repairs.


I get there are people in danger of this, older people, obese people and many other conditions and they shouldn’t take this lightly. I also understand the numbers and healthy younger people need to get back school and work and fun.


kevin rise

I think you’re getting mixed up with the Iraq war and that old terrorism color watch, anyone remember that?…. and the Patriot Act, ie, America takes Chinese Policy Act and steals your right to privacy.


mazin

Protective masks are effective in preventing the wearer from spraying droplets on others. One wears them to protect others.

The carbon monoxide information provided does not adequately support the poisoning conclusion. It does not show that wearing protective masks can create a 35 ppm or greater concentration of carbon monoxide.

People have been wearing facial scarves and dust masks for a long time. Respectfully, I don’t think your assertion is true.


laftch

Well muzzling is the objective, but sir you have it wrong about the carbon monoxide. While carbon dioxide is a byproduct of cell metabolism carbon monoxide is not produced by the body. It is probably true that the masks may inhibit the complete exhalation of CO2 causing a build up in the blood which may affect some people. The greater danger, if there really is a threat from airborne spread through droplets, doubtful in my opinion, is the sloppy practice of procedure in donning and doffing PPE that no doubt is being employed by the untrained public. Are these masks and scarfs being sterilized after use? Doubt it. Are they being treated as bio hazardous waste? Doubt it.