North County distillery in hot water over hand sanitizer production

August 10, 2022

Aaron Bergh

By JOSH FRIEDMAN

A North County distillery that joined in the emergency hand sanitizer production effort in 2020 has come under investigation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over chemical levels in their product.

Calwise Spirits, located on Ramada Drive south of Paso Robles, produced hand sanitizer early in the COVID-19 pandemic. The distillery’s sanitizer had levels of acetaldehyde that were too high, according to the FDA.

Acetaldehyde is a chemical compound that occurs naturally in certain food and drinks, such as fruit and juice. However, it is also listed as a carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Calwise Spirits owner Aaron Bergh says his hand sanitizer contained 160 parts per million (ppm) of acetaldehyde. The FDA’s limit is 50 ppm, but Bergh disputes that the acetaldehyde level in his hand sanitizer was unsafe.

“This threshold does not make any sense, as the acetaldehyde content of wine and other beverages (which people actually ingest) can well exceed over 200 ppm,” Bergh stated in a tweet on Monday.

Bergh also claims that Calwise Spirits and other distilleries being probed by the FDA actually followed the agency’s instructions on producing hand sanitizer.

“Every distiller I’ve talked to who was audited by the FDA has also been accused of having acetaldehyde in their sanitizer,” Bergh tweeted. “Since we all used different raw materials, it’s incredibly likely that the problem is the formula the FDA told us to use. In short, acetaldehyde forms through oxidation of alcohol. The formula that the FDA told us to use, aka WHO Handrub formula #1, required us to add hydrogen peroxide to our alcohol — which is a strong oxidant.”

Previously, the FDA and distilleries, including Calwise Spirits, were at odds over a fee the federal agency imposed on the businesses for producing hand sanitizer. The FDA imposed the fee of more than $14,000 in late 2020. Days later, the decision to impose the fee was reversed.

Now, the FDA is again punishing distilleries for making emergency hand sanitizer, Bergh says.

“Large corporations were unable to pivot fast enough to meet the immense demand for hand sanitizer. The nimble, innovative nature of independent distillers allowed us to rise to the occasion. Now the FDA is punishing us,” Bergh tweeted. “The FDA is disincentivizing small businesses from acting as good Samaritans when the next disaster strikes.”


Loading...
4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Never raise your hand… a lesson for the ages….


This is f*ing sad, the Trump FDA and continued through the Biden FDA is trying to micromanage a business product that was intending to help people over some obscure rule that makes zero logical sense. We are done as a society if this crap piles up. What a disgrace!


“The nimble, innovative nature of independent distillers allowed us to rise to the occasion. Now the FDA is punishing us,” Bergh tweeted. “


Once again, we receive proof and verification of the old adage that “No Good Deed goes unpunished.”


So it has a ingrediant that is found in higher quantity in other items which is ok but this item isn’t. Sounds like typical government no sense rule. We couldn’t get this sanitizer from our China enemy so the American people took over and then as usual the Government wants to punish us as they are tied to the hip of the China Dictatotors