Nearly $4 million awarded to SLO County water projects, San Simeon declined
September 8, 2022
By KAREN VELIE
Six of the seven applicants vying for a cut of $3,8 million in state grants awarded San Luis Obispo County are in line to receive funding for water projects, while one local agency was declined because of multiple failures.
The seven applicants include the cities of Morro Bay and Pismo Beach; the Oceano, San Miguel and San Simeon community service districts and the SLO County Flood Control District. The SLO County Regional Water Management Group, which consists of local water serving agencies in the region, provides Prop. 1 grant distribution recommendations to the SLO County Board of Supervisors.
Distribution recommendations
Morro Bay – $1.2 for its recycled water facility.
Pismo Beach – $1 million for Central Coast Blue, also a recycled water facility.
Oceano – $600,000 for a water reliability project.
SLO County – $549,755 for a master water report system.
San Miguel – $300,000 for a water reliability project.
SLO County – $132,374 for operating the grant program.
San Simeon requested $1.5 million for a new water tank, which was denied because district staff and officials failed to prepare for the project. This is the second year in a row San Simeon was denied grant money because of issues with management of the proposed project.
The district had negotiated with the Hearst Corporation regarding a proposed easement to place a community water tank on the ranch, but that was before the Hearst Corporation learned the district had encroached on their land.
In 2016, the district built a reverse osmosis unit that encroaches on the ranch and into the public road right-of-way.
The district is currently negotiating with the Hearst Corporation regarding an agreement over the encroachment, which needs to be hammered out before the Hearst family is likely to allow an easement for a water tank.
The comments below represent the opinion of the writer and do not represent the views or policies of CalCoastNews.com. Please address the Policies, events and arguments, not the person. Constructive debate is good; mockery, taunting, and name calling is not. Comment Guidelines