Front Page  »  

Coastal Commission approves two more sea walls in SLO County

October 20, 2025

Erosion behind home on Naomi Avenue in Pismo Beach

By KAREN VELIE

After years of blocking residents from protecting their properties from erosion, the California Coastal Commission in October gave the green light to homeowners in Pismo Beach and another homeowner in Cayucos to repair or construct seawalls.

Because both of the homes were built before 1977, the year the Coastal Act went into effect, the owners are permitted to protect their properties through repair and construction of seawalls. The commission’s approvals, however, come with costly conditions that appear to favor wealthy homeowners.

During the storms of 2023, the seawall protecting Rick and Tammy Loughead’s home on Naomi Avenue was damaged. In addition, huge waves creating caves underneath their property

On Oct. 10, the California Coastal Commission agreed to allow the Lougheads to repair the seawall and plug the caves while requiring the homeowners to:

  • Repair and enhancement the Vista Del Mar stairway.
  • Dedicate a portion of their property for use as a public recreational access easement for public recreational access use in perpetuity.

Dr. Marshall Lewis owns a home on Lucerne Street in Cayucos where cliff erosion is endangering the structure.

Erosion behind a home on Lucerne Street in Cayucos

Also on Oct. 10, the California Coastal Commission agreed to allow Lewis to build a 45-foot long and 30-to45-foot wide seawall to stop the erosion while requiring him to:

  • Make repairs and improvements to public coastal beach access staircase at Mannix Avenue.
  • Dedicate a portion of his property for use as a public recreational access easement for public recreational access use in perpetuity.

After battling for more than two decades to protect his home on the bluffs of Pismo Beach, earlier this year Gary Grossman agreed to pay $548,170 for permission from the California Coastal Commission to repair his seawall.

Grossman is required to pay the funds to Pismo Beach. The city is mandated to use the funds for projects such as beach access, coastal pathways, and park improvements.

Because we believe the public needs the facts, the truth, CalCoastNews has not put up a paywall because it limits readership. However, we are seeking qualification as a paper of record, which will allow us to publish public notices, this requires 5,000 paid subscribers.

Your subscription will help us to continue investigating and reporting the news.

Support CalCoastNews, subscribe today, click here.

 


Loading...
Subjects:         
Related:


7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The CCC endorsing 1000 ft. Windmills while they extort the rights of private property owners. And we have people complaining about Kings?


40

The owners should donate the homes and property access to the state. Then, watch how fast the rock barriers and seawalls get built…


30

I would guess not at all lol. This is being strictly because the home owner initiated it. If the city owned it they would probably spend a decade deciding what to with it and by then it would be worth more money so they would sell the property with the same stipulations. Or it will possibly have eroded into the ocean by then.


-4

ex·tor·tion

/ikˈstôrSHən,ekˈstôrSHən/

noun

Having to dedicate a portion of your private property to be used as public recreational access.


54

Also: Private property owners being coerced by government to pay for improvements to public infrastructure entirely unrelated to their property and the project for which they are seeking permit approval.


1

California…… a government the wealthy can buy..


42

While it certainly is rich vs poor and not any of the distraction topics; this is not limited to California in any way shape or form. The “elite” ultra wealthy think they can do whatever they across the country.


-6