San Luis Harbor District delays vote on step towards industrialization

November 27, 2025

Early site rendering of example of integration at Port San Luis.

By KAREN VELIE

Plans to transform Port San Luis Harbor District in rural Avila Beach into an industrial port hit a snag earlier this month when the commissioners delayed plans to vote on a $3 million grant after nearly 100 people showed up to voice their opposition. The small room was not large enough to support public participation.

For years, harbor district staff has discussed plans to industrialize the port, though most negotiations have been in closed session with little information available to the public. On Nov. 18, the commissioners were planning to move forward with the grant.

The California Energy Commission Offshore Wind Energy Waterfront Facility Improvement Program Grant funds are to be used to:

1. Expand the harbor district’s capacity to effectively oversee the development of a potential
Port San Luis terminal and support the realization of a new long-term revenue stream for
the district.

2. Deepen local community, tribal, stakeholder, and government agency education and
engagement on the proposed terminal development opportunity.

3. Position residents, local community organizations, interested stakeholder organizations,
and local tribal individuals and governments to realize benefits from the potential
development of the Port San Luis terminal.

4. Update the proposed Port San Luis terminal’s engineering design and prepare the
project for future development phases (submission of permits).

5. Develop an emissions-reduction strategy for the proposed terminal development project.

6. Identify workforce development and supply chain opportunities for local individuals,
educational institutions, and businesses.

Opponents of offshore wind energy said that by accepting the grant, the board would be giving its approval to industrialize the port without allowing the public to weigh in. In addition, with plans for wind energy off the coast of Morro Bay up in the air, spending the grant money could be a waste of public funds.

The Port San Luis Harbor District Board of Commissioners then voted to delay discussion of accepting the grant until they could find a larger facility to hold the meeting.

President of REACT Alliance Mandy Davis said there are multiple reasons for the board to reject the grant.

“First, there’s the obvious, why in hell would we start to “mature” an industrial port project for an industry that doesn’t exist in the United States and is highly experimental,” Davis said. “Second, the grant money will in no way benefit the port and its current needs for retrofitting and port upgrades…all monies will go to offshore wind sub contractors and various pro wind stakeholders, not the port general fund. Third, why would we be ok with the state wasting millions of dollars of taxpayer money on unnecessary studies when there are already two studies in place studying the feasibility of offshore wind ports on the Central Coast that have not been finished and commented on by the public as mandated.

“Let’s face it, it’s all just smoke and mirrors,” Davis added. “A state that is in financial trouble already wasting precious taxpayer money to try to convince the public that offshore wind is alive and well in California. It is not! let’s just quit prolonging the death throes of an industry that will never work here, or anywhere else in California for that matter.”

 


Loading...
15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Please consider signing the petition against this boondoggle offshore wind port project at https://c.org/HyVWqsQSgx


IMPORTANT MEETING NOTICE. PLEASE ATTEND!


SPECIAL PORT SAN LUIS HARBOR DISTRICT MEETING


TUESDAY DECEMBER 2 AT 9:00 am

AVILA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER

191 SAN MIGUEL STREET, AVILA BEACH


SHOW UP TO TELL THE PORT DISTRICT TO SAVE PORT SAN LUIS AND STOP THE OFFSHORE WIND FARM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PORT PROJECT!


Beyond the issue the grant is premature because the other two feasibility studies are not complete and no public outreach has been done for those studies, the global issue is the failure of Port San Luis to make their meetings accessible to the public. With no remote participation available, no option to watch/listen to the meeting, it leaves the public only the option to attend in person. Further this is exacerbated by holding a meeting during the middle of the work day for a topic that, if moves forward, will irrevocably change the coastline with industrialization. I can’t think of any other local jurisdiction that makes it this difficult to participate-it’s almost like they don’t want to let their constituents and residents of the county what they are doing. In addition to opposing industrialization of the coast, also let the Port San Luis Board of Commissioners know their grade in transparency is an “F”.


The more I look into this , the more it looks like a “jobs program” for a consultancy or two to me.

One thing all elected officials need to worry about is having friends and family directly benefit from their decisions. Also, no one can afford to get caught in a situation where self-enrichment is linked to the wink and nod offers from powerful , financially invested forces.


Totally!


Does anyone think Santa Barbara Harbor Commission would allow this development in their area? No. But their thinking ” we can always let the shmucks from Port San Luis, build this one out. For the green scheme … you know?


Exactly!


Reading interview remarks from supporters of the proposal would have been helpful.


Wouldn’t be surprised if they moved the next vote to a time they think opposition won’t show up or at least delayed for enough time to bus in pro supporters to offset the local opposition.


Commissioners: Read the room. Not wanted. We get the “ Grant” , but could be mistaken for a bribe by monied interests trying to get their foot in the door here locally to put tax and ratepayers on the hook forever!

P. S. I think any funds spent on our collective “ education and engagement “ is a joke.

Can’t you just say No to these grifters?


I sure hope a majority of the commissioners vote no!


This country is falling incredibly behind the rest of the developed planet because of goofy people that don’t even know what they’re fighting against. Anti wind is pro oil; lets not turn into the next Santa Barbara with oil derricks lining the horizon. Before you say “bUt YOur fIne WiTH wINdmilLs!?!??”, they wont be visible from shore according to the plans. So… why are fighting on behalf of oil corporations? More sources of energy means cheaper bills… but no; do PG&E’s bidding. Smh.


I would suggest you take some time to educate yourself about offshore wind. It’s detrimental to the environment. It’s basically big oil doing wind and the industrialization in and of itself will be beyond harmful. The offshore wind people are extremely cognizant of what they’re fighting against and they’ve done an incredible job, against all odds, to make sure that the citizens of San Luis Obispo county at least have a fighting chance to understand what this industrialization means.


While I am no big fan of “ Big Oil” , I understand one thing: They too are in the midst of the Great Green Revolution too. In on it.

Who won the bid to put all the solar in all the area school parking lots years ago? Arco – Atlantic Richfield.

Who just sign the biggest carbon capture contract in Europe? Shell Oil

All those contractors who build oil platforms or windmills – like Chicago Bridge are all oil company aligned businesses that would love to build your wind farm.

This ancient myth that the oil companies oppose renewables has GOT to end. They aren’t threatened, indeed they are fully vested in many projects.

So are our old Military Industrial Complex contractors, like Raytheon and General Dynamics.

…. And Blackrock and Vanguard…Do your homework . They aren’t hiding.. The list goes on and on. It’s a fantasy to think there are just a bunch of old hippies and nerds are behind the Green stuff.

No, it’s The Big Money … as always.


Vote No, No, and more No!!