Peppered, pounded, pizza shop owner seeks big SLO dough
July 17, 2008
Posted 1/22/2008
Posted 1/22/2008
Member Opinions:
By: Anonymous on 4/16/08
Similar incidents are happening in Paso Robles. When are the racketeering govt tyrants (and union thugs) gong to be accountable to the taxpayers who pay their salaries.
By: Anonymous on 2/16/08
Has this been covered at all in the T-T?
By: Anonymous on 1/27/08
Captivating a reader’s interest is the reason why you have good copy editors to put exciting headlines on a story. Case in point: today’s Trib story about the defacing of the church… turns out they just wrote “666” and drew a pentagram on a dry-erase board. I expected some spray paint or glass etching after reading the headline.
By: Anonymous on 1/27/08
Anon-
I think you’re splitting hairs between finely crafted journalism (ha) and muckracking, yellow journalism, which is what Blackburn does on a level unrivaled on the West Coast. In order to be useful the story must first be read. To be read, it must hold the readers interest. A story about some lawyer filing a lawsuit isn’t at the top of my list.
By: Anonymous on 1/24/08
Of course the city always denies claims like this. I’m not going to give away $10 million or whatever to just anyone either. It’s really just something to make suing the government more annoying. That said, it’s an important step in any case like this, which is why it would be the news item. The first eight paragraphs were about what happened initially, all of which had already been covered. It’s not news; it’s olds. The new development in the story is the denial of the claim, which all but means the city is going to court. Since it’s the news, it needs to go at the top of the story. Then, the first eight paragraphs can go toward the end as a space filler and as a backstory for someone that might have missed the original story.
By: Anonymous on 1/24/08
Hey Anon,
The city ALWAYS denies these suits.
This is clearly a lack of supervision and experience. SLOPD has had a recent history of bad decision making.
Where is the missing elderly man from a couple years ago? No body no nothing. Supervisors decided they did not need to search for him immediately?
Why do police rush this guy in his own home, but do not enter a home to check on people when the family says they are having trouble contacting them?
By the way the person in the second example was later found dead.
This suit was a long time comming, as are investigations into the other incidents.
By: Anonymous on 1/23/08
Oh Crap! they are in deep do. Good job keeping this public
By: Anonymous on 1/23/08
Thanks for the update. This story needs to stay in the public eye.
By: Anonymous on 1/23/08
New Times broke the stroy months ago- no one esle would cover it. Thanks for the up-date.
By: Anonymous on 1/22/08
I like the way the story was written. It was all new to me. Thanks, Dan, for keeping us posted on this.
By: Anonymous on 1/22/08
I think it’s safe to assume anyone reading this site keeps himself or herself well-informed on local news. Even if the first seven paragraphs are needed in the off-chance this is a new story to someone, they should go at the end of the story. The actual news of the story doesn’t start until paragraph eight — that his claim was denied and he’s preparing a lawsuit.
The comments below represent the opinion of the writer and do not represent the views or policies of CalCoastNews.com. Please address the Policies, events and arguments, not the person. Constructive debate is good; mockery, taunting, and name calling is not. Comment Guidelines