Smoking ban effective Thursday

mrbishop – Try the truth, Second Hand smoke and claimed health risk’s are a myth, The EPA falsified it’s reports to suit the insurance companies. It was then picked up by BUNCH OF ACTIVISTS THAT DIDN’T LIKE SMOKING. They have managed to foist their preferences to include what people can do in their own apartments and standing on the streets away from other citizens.

http://psyed.org/r/crit/crd/second_smoke.html

The new study, to be published in the May 17 issue of the British Medical Journal, shows no measurable rates of heart disease or lung cancer among nonsmokers who ever lived with smokers

http://www.gasdetection.com/news2/health_news_digest996.html

As a scientist who regularly writes about indoor air quality, I must approach this topic with an appropriate degree of objectivity: I do not have a vested interest in the politics of this matter, but I do have a responsibility – both as a biochemist and member of the scientific community – to dispel some commonly held myths about secondhand smoke and the risk of cancer.

Unfortunately, the entire subject of secondhand smoke resides in an area of discourse heavily laced with activists, who, passionate about their mission of improving public health, far too readily exaggerate the dangers.

http://digg.com/politics/New_Study_Sends_Secondhand_Smoke_Myth_Up_In_Flames

A 40-year study of Californians, the largest study on secondhand smoke to date, has reached the conclusion that anti-tobacco extremists have been dreading: their claims about the health risks from secondhand smoke are bogus. A 40-year study of Californians, the largest study on secondhand smoke to date, has reached the conclusion that anti-tobacco extremists have been dreading: their claims about the health risks from secondhand smoke are bogus.

http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-23540013_ITM

The crusade encountered a major and unanticipated setback a few weeks ago when the British Medical Journal published a study by two U.S. researchers that found no statistically significant association between not only ETS and lung cancer but also between ETS and heart disease.

The study focused on 35,561 Californians who never smoked but had smoking spouses. The participants were all part of the massive American Cancer …