Fix for homeless ticketing — maybe
August 3, 2012
Details of a tentative agreement regarding the ticketing of homeless persons caught sleeping in their vehicles in San Luis Obispo remains, for the time being, secret.
The reported agreement is an interim step toward settlement of a lawsuit filed on behalf of homeless persons who have been handed expensive citations while trying to a get a night’s sleep. Earlier this year, the city council voted in favor of a non-profit’s proposal for a parking program that officials from the non-profit said was dependent on the city escalating enforcement against homeless who did not support its program.
City officials’ intentions were short-circuited by San Luis Obispo County Superior Court Judge Charles Candall, who issued a preliminary injunction in July prohibiting the city from taking such actions.
The city council then “overruled” Crandall, rewrote the ordinance and placed it in a health and safety code section in an attempt to continue to prohibit homeless from sleeping in their cars. Enforcement of the new ordinance is slated to begin on Aug. 9.
A settlement such as this, which has the approval of homeless alliance attorneys Saro Rizzo and Stew Jenkins, must first be approved by the City Council and then by the court.
“The length of the mediation between the city and the SLO Homeless Alliance was seven and a half hours, from 10 a.m., right through lunch, until 5:30 p.m.,” Jenkins said. “The city paid for five hours of mediator Scott Radovich’s time, but Mr. Radovich donated his time for the added 3.5 hours. He also donated his own time in what I would estimate would have been a full day of preparation. On behalf of the members of the SLO Homeless Alliance I want to publicly express their gratitude for the contribution of time and attention made by Mr. Radovich to mediating the issues.”
The comments below represent the opinion of the writer and do not represent the views or policies of CalCoastNews.com. Please address the Policies, events and arguments, not the person. Constructive debate is good; mockery, taunting, and name calling is not. Comment Guidelines