Alleged homeless advocates accused of stealing from the poor

February 4, 2013

Cliff AndersonKeeping them homeless

By KAREN VELIE, JOSH FRIEDMAN and DANIEL BLACKBURN

(Editor’s note: This is the first in a series about San Luis Obispo County Homeless Services and the non-profit that manages the program. See Cliff Anderson’s struggles at the bottom of this story.)

Cliff Anderson lost his home in 2008 when a fire broke out in his apartment. Almost four years later and after making $41,420 in payments to remain in Community Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo’s case management, Anderson still has no home.

“They said they are going to get me into housing any day,” Anderson said last week.

However, he remains in the Maxine Lewis Homeless Shelter — and nearly all of the money he’s entrusted to CAPSLO’s case management appears to have disappeared. CAPSLO’s administration requires homeless who sleep in the shelter or a car parked in their lot to make the program the payee for their government checks. Case management then keeps 50 to 70 percent of a client’s money with claims it is placed into a secure account to be used in the future to pay for housing.

Anderson’s situation with CAPSLO is not unique. CalCoastNews has spent two years investigating CAPSLO and interviewing people the quasi-public agency claims to serve. CCN has learned that CAPSLO has engaged in practices that have homeless people giving the partnership much of the public assistance money they receive, but getting little or nothing in return.

In Anderson’s case, he has signed over his disability benefits to case management for the last three and a half years, Social Security records show.

CAPSLO administration claims collected money belongs to the client, and is being saved in order to get them into housing. There is no charge for staying at the shelter.

In Social Security benefits, Anderson brings in about $970 a month; CAPSLO permits him to keep $400 per month which leaves case management owing him about $20,000.

In addition, his case manager charges Anderson $25 every few months to run credit checks to determine if he qualifies for housing, and he is required pay about $37 a month for others to manage his money.

The federal government requires that entities trying to become payees for disabled clients receiving SSI attend special meetings where Social Security officials inform them that people on SSI must spend the benefits they receive. Disability money is required to be expended each month on necessities, not saved in the bank. People on SSI can only save a total of $2,000 out of their SSI payments.

And each year, the entities, known as payees, have to confirm to the Social Security Administration that recipients have not saved more than $2,000. It is considered fraud to misreport.

An SSI recipient or payee is responsible for returning payments to the federal government after the $2,000 limit has been reached. That means CAPSLO or Family Ties, a company retained by the agency, owes the Social Security Administration approximately $37,000 for misreporting Anderson’s account.

But CAPSLO says it doesn’t owe anything. CAPSLO Chief Operating Officer Jim Famalette claims that CAPSLO’s case managers are not the payees taking Anderson’s money. Anderson and the people like him are working with Family Ties, not CAPSLO, according to Famalette.

“We do not act as a payee for those funds,” Famalette said in an email to CalCoastNews.

But Lisa Niesen, Family Ties’ owner, said her company is not the payee getting the SSI payments for CAPSLO’s homeless clients. In any event, most of the client accounts contain minimal balances, she said.

“None of the clients we have from case management have more than a few thousand dollars in their account, and most have just $20 to $30,” Niesen said.

Several of CAPSLO’s homeless clients said they do not have an agreement with Family Ties. Niesen said her company’s agreement is with CAPSLO, not the case management clients.

SSI records for Anderson list Family Ties as the recipient for his money, but when homeless clients have questions about their accounts, they are required to deal with CAPSLO case managers.

In the past two years, homeless clients of CAPSLO have approached CalCoastNews with allegations that CAPSLO case managers often refuse to return all client monies when they leave the program or sometimes give a small percentage of what they are owed. If clients complain, they are barred from receiving CAPSLO homeless services.

Several current and former case managers have also said that they believe money is being embezzled from the clients’ accounts.

For years, CAPSLO administrators have refused to respond to allegations of missing funds, or to answer questions about what happens to a client’s money if they die.

On Friday, Famalette responded, saying that the allegations against a CAPSLO manager are a “baseless innuendo not worthy of a response.”

Meanwhile, CAPSLO is working to get approval for a 200-bed shelter and an overnight parking program. The parking program eventually would accommodate 200 vehicles.

Dee Torres asks the San Luis Obispo City Council to approve more aggressive treatment of the homeless who do not enter case management.

Dee Torres asks the San Luis Obispo City Council to approve more aggressive treatment of the homeless who do not enter case management.

In March, the San Luis Obispo City Council entertained CAPSLO’s proposal to increase ticketing of homeless who sleep in their vehicles without agreeing to participate in case management, which requires giving CAPSLO case management a portion of their income.

Proponents of the more aggressive ticketing include San Luis Obispo County Supervisor Adam Hill. Hill is in a relationship with CAPSLO’s Homeless Services Coordinator Dee Torres. Torres and Hill did not respond to requests for comment.

When Torres brought the proposal to the SLO City Council, Hill asked the council not to heed comments by members of the public who oppose Torres’ proposal. He said that the issue of homelessness is too complicated for most lay people to understand.

Torres argued for the change, claiming that CAPSLO had already managed to get five homeless clients in the parking program into housing. One client, Gulf War veteran Kimberly Frey-Griffin, said the claim was not accurate. Though she did get into housing, she said it was in spite of CAPSLO.

From December 2011 through May 2012, Frey-Griffin paid her case manager $25 to $50 a week she earned from cleaning houses. After more than five months in the program, on her own, she found and paid to get herself into housing. When she asked for her approximately $700 back, her case manager handed her a check for $133, and then added Frey-Griffin to the CAPSLO list of housing success stories.

Nevertheless, public officials throughout the county, many of whom sit on the CAPSLO Board of Directors, are the first to applaud CAPSLO for its work with the homeless.

 

Cliff Anderson’s struggles

He is a shell of a man, 6 feet tall and only 158 pounds, afflicted with severe edema and varicose veins, he lives in unrelenting agony.

He spends his days exposed to the elements, weathered beyond his years, trying to navigate the dangerous and homeless world of violent drug addicts, the mentally ill and those looking to steal what little he has.

He is a 69-year-old San Luis Obispo native who worked as a butcher most of his life, spending about a decade employed at the United Meat Market in San Luis Obispo.

It is a difficult life at the Maxine Lewis Shelter. Staff awaken clients at 6 a.m. to do chores, and then require the clients to leave by 7 a.m. Cliff Anderson often sits by the railroad tracks waiting for the 10 a.m. bus to the Prado Day Center, where he is exposed to the elements because CAPSLO management contends there is not enough money available to open the warming center.

The Prado warming center has been open only four days this year, despite a $25,000 donation last year from PG&E to benefit energy efficiency at Prado. The money was spent installing an air conditioning unit in the staff office area.

Cliff Anderson's foot

Cliff Anderson’s foot

Anderson must be waiting outside the shelter each night at 5 p.m., even though check-in does not start until 6 p.m. Once inside, clients are not permitted to watch television except on Saturday and Sunday evenings. Conversely, the North County shelter allows their clients to watch television each evening until 10 p.m.

Anderson’s cowboy boots are worn and uncomfortable. His feet are swollen and covered in veins. Anderson said a doctor had told him to get new shoes. But he has no money.

Nevertheless, his numerous requests to case managers — some witnessed by CalCoastNews reporters — to provide some of his own money to purchase a new pair of shoes have been rebuffed or ignored. Other homeless clients of CAPSLO tell similar stories of their medical needs not being met because their case managers refuse to provide the clients own money to do so.

 

Keeping Them Homeless, the series.


Loading...
154 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“…baseless innuendo not worthy of a response” = We’re not transparent.


Sounds like they need a little help in coming forth. Where do we picket and when? Thursday at 12 noon at Prado/Higuera work for everyone?


Interest? Ideas? Email to kevin@kevinrice.org


“Thumbs up” don’t cut it. Who is able and willing to do something? Again, email your ideas please.


OK, I’m concerned enough to come on down. I’ll bring paper, pens, stamps and envelopes. Lets encourage people to write letters while we’re standing around. I’ll e-mail you right now.


I would like to offer to buy Mr. Anderson a new pair of boots, how can I do this without somebody stealing this money also?


He needs a life-time steak coupon, a long with new boots. SLO is pathetic. They need to do something about these crooks. Now!


Doggin nice sentiments in your writing. Tell me where to send you some money. I would like to get him some boots and a foot doc.


God Bless all who care. God Bless the ones that don’t care also. They need God’s help big time.


To Cindy’s Question: If we knew, why didn’t we tell someone?


That has happenned, but the political landscape is so incestuous in SLO that some of the people who knew or were informed, were in a position to kill the report.


Word on the street, Dee and Lisa have been behind closed doors all morning and on numerous phone calls. They’re both visibly shaking and Torres appears to be on the verge of collapse. Hill has been running back and forth and is red in the face. The phones are ringing off the hook and everyone is talking about it.


One more thing: If clients are having their credit checked every few months, won’t that drive their credit score down over time making them ineligible to ever receive housing because of their low score? This sounds like a way to keep people down and keep the checks flowing to CAPSLO/Prado.


There is no reason to check credit every few months. There is a line of people waiting for housing. When you have a home available you check credit on the first in line, if it checks out, they get the place, if not then you check on the second in line. No house available, no need to check the credit, enough said.


Nothing they do makes any sense at this point. This appears to be nothing more than an excuse to siphon additional monies apart from the $37 a month for the ‘forced case management account’ from people who are broken, down trodden, hungry, cold, needy, sick and already living on the streets.


Those SOB’s , I need stop right here.


I have been saying this all along in other comments, but of course I was called a liar! Gee, I’m surprised anyone believes this story, I mean afterall, homeless people are liars!


This is why CAPSLO never required their clients (the homeless) to seek employment, if they all got jobs and into their own place, Dee Torres and the rest of them would have empty pockets! They have been capitalizing on the homeless for years. As far as “helping” them get places, “they don’t do that”!


“This is why CAPSLO never required their clients (the homeless) to seek employment…”


Yes! This is also why CAPSLO doesn’t breathalyze or drug test. Then Dee and Adam go in front of the citizens of SLO and say the homeless are drunks and refuse to work and ask for more money and the rest is history. Dee has been banking on the homeless from every which way for YEARS.


Actually, they do breathalyze some. They let their favorites do whatever they want! I have done a lot of homework!


Ha! Yep! I was told that the family shelter was drug and alcohol free and that this was monitored closely…what a joke….almost everyone there were on drugs and anyone who complained started to get cruel treatment and zero help with housing..wait a minute I don’t think I saw anyone get help with housing…bye, bye Dee Torres oppressor of the poor


Finally, the elephant in the room will be talked about. Did they think the rest of the non-profit community does not see the elephant in the room? We’ve all known for years.


My question is what will happen to the excess funds above $2,000 that the homeless have been forced to save in CAPSLO case management accounts? Does this mean that those funds will be forfeited back to SSI? Since these people were forced to pay those funds into an account if they wanted a place to sleep and a meal, then CAPSLO should owe those funds back to the victims regardless of whether they also owe those funds back to SSI. I’m certain Mr Andeson could find a permanent place to live with his $20K and some new boots – to boot. This is just so so sad.


JB Bronson, If you and others knew, why didn’t you say something?


there is a lot I’ve been trying to say, but as usual, I’m a liar. I have also been trying to say that the cops harass the homeless (or those they think are homeless), all in thanks to CAPSLO and the SLO City Council. Now how can all those involved with CAPSLO/SLO City Council, want to have resouces for the homeless..shelter, food, housing, “Case Management”, when at the same time they want the cops to “begin harassing until all the homeless are moved out”.? Noticed that was in quotations?


For anyone that is interested in this Non-Profit Organization, 501 (c) (3) as Community Action Partnership Of San Luis Obispo County, Inc, aka as CAPSLO was formally ESCLO which was founded to 1966 by a group of San Luis Obispo Community members.. CAPSLO has grown into a big money maker for a lot of people, Dee Torres not to be exempted. According to its website, this organzation now provides its services to 10 communities like San Luis Obispo County. It is no longer a local community based organzation. It is another branch of government and indirectly a branch of Social Services. According to GuideStar (tracks non-profit 501 (c)(3) organzations CAPSLO was founded n 1966, its IRS EIN 95-2410253 is their number, their Annual Reporting for 01-10-2010 thru 03-21-2011 was: REVENUE: 59,767,661 and their EXPENSES: 59,675,218 (Yes, that is 59 MILLION). By the way, they do NOT have the GuideStar Exchange Seal which is the seal issued to organizations worthy of your donations. This is all out on the internet. This organization must be audited but certainly not by anyone in this County. We certainly do not want the San Luis Obspo County Counsel involved in this.


The best way to help this man and the others who may be in the same dilemma is to demand that the State Attorney General and/or the investigative body that oversees the Social Security Administration (U.S. Office of Inspector General) conduct a forensic audit)


http://www.ehow.com/about_5031886_forensic-audit-definition.html


You can also contact Congress Reps Capps, McCarthy, Senators Feinstein and Boxer and excecise your voice and concerns as a costituent.


On face value, this article is very disturbing.


A thumbs down on MikeB’s request for an audit? Who in their right mind could think that’s a BAD idea?


whomever is skimming.


I can think of at least two People, Mr Hill and Ms Torres.


Yes. And how could Biz Steinberg have no knowledge of this? She heads CAPSLO. And what about the Prado board of directors? And what about Supervisor Patterson? Isn’t he on the board as well?


Don’t forget Ms Niesen who doesn’t seem to know that she as the owner of “Family Ties” is the direct payee of Andersons $970.00 a month disability check from which Anderson receives $400.00. This has been going on each month for 3 1/2 years but no one has more than a ‘few thousand’ in their account. SSI records show her company as the payee and someone is cashing the checks but she doesn’t know anything about it. Imagine that, 42 transactions and she doesn’t know that her company received those funds but we all know she did (under the name ‘Family Ties’ ) that is unless we want to believe that SSI doesn’t know where they send the funds or who the checks are made out to.


Of course you’re otherwise correct, as who demanded the case management policy and arranged the funneling of the funds – Ah yes CAPSLO and who runs CAPSLO. Ah Yes……………


The AG needs to be contacted as well as the SSI Administration. Between Adam Hill on the BOS and the scandal the city created by attempting to ignore court orders regarding the rights of the homeless, there is simply no credibility but rather a conflict of interest at this point.


Case point is the added embarrassment of the SLOCC attempting to coerce homeless advocates Jenkins and Rizzo, into donating attorneys fees awarded by the court to CAPSLO.