Rizzo amends his SLO rental inspection lawsuit
November 14, 2016
Local activist Kevin Rice has joined a property owners association and several landlords in filing a lawsuit against the city of San Luis Obispo over its controversial rental inspection program.
On Oct. 28, attorney Saro Rizzo filed an amended complaint which includes allegations by Rice that the rental inspection ordinance violates his Fourth Amendment protections and right to privacy. Specifically, that under the Constitution the law should treat similarly situated people alike.
Because Rice rents a single family residence, his domicile falls under the rental inspection ordinance where buildings of three or more apartments do not.
Rice’s landlord has asked him to comply with the rental inspection program and allow city inspectors into his home. Because of this, Rice is fearful he could be evicted if he denies the city inspectors access, according to the lawsuit.
“The right to privacy includes the right to be left alone in one’s home and the home is the place that is traditionally protected most strongly by the constitutional right of privacy,” the lawsuit says.
Rice joins the San Luis Obispo Property Owners Association, Steve and Janine Barasch and Matt and Jean Kokkonen in the suit that claims the city’s rental inspection program violates equal protection rights and the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.
In May 2015, the city council voted 3-2 to adopt the ordinance that allows an inspector to enter and examine rental units to determine if the properties are safe and habitable. The ordinance also requires landlords to pay a fee to fund the program.
Landlords with rentals of two or less units are subject to the inspection program while buildings with three units or more are not subject to inspections.
City officials argue that buildings of three or more units are subject to inspection through a statewide program. However, the state does not require an inspection fee or have mandatory, routine inspections.
The lawsuit seeks the elimination of the rental inspection ordinance, the cost of the suit and attorney’s fees.
The comments below represent the opinion of the writer and do not represent the views or policies of CalCoastNews.com. Please address the Policies, events and arguments, not the person. Constructive debate is good; mockery, taunting, and name calling is not. Comment Guidelines