Questionable spending at SLO County IWMA on the agenda

May 25, 2018

IWMA Administrator Bill Worrell and legal counsel Ray Biering

Editor’s note: The Wayne Hall letter requesting an audit of the San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority is at the bottom of this story.

By Cal Coast Times staff

San Luis Obispo County’s public agency responsible for waste disposal is awash in suspicious financial improprieties and has not been properly audited for the two decades of its existence, a former high-ranking county administrator has told the agency’s board of directors.

Wayne Hall delivered a blistering letter to board members of the Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) earlier this month calling for a forensic audit of the IWMA’s handling of tax dollars entrusted to it. Hall was sharply critical of the agency’s “blatant disregard for statutory requirements for spending, contracting, and accounting.”

Hall was an assistant county administrative officer and later chief executive officer of the SLO County Superior Court. He was a primary author of the joint powers agreement that created the IWMA.  His letter was read to the board by county resident Mark London.

While London spoke, SLO County Supervisor Adam Hill took photos of London from the podium. Hill later hid his face behind a sheet of paper while a reporter took photos.

The call to put a discussion for a deep audit of IWMA’s money management on the next agenda was met with vociferous opposition from two county supervisors and board members Adam Hill and Bruce Gibson.

“I don’t understand the purpose,” Hill said. “Every time someone comes forward, we should give an audit?”

IWMA attorney Ray Biering wanted to limit the discussion of an audit to a three member executive committee, but was shot down as board members argued the issue should be heard by the entire board. While Biering is paid as inside legal counsel, his firm is paid for outside legal work without a bidding process or board approval, according to investigator Carl Knudson.

Gibson, who often votes lockstep with Hill, also opposed a financial examination of IWMA’s practices.

“There is no need for an audit,” Gibson said. “There have been no improprieties.”

The IWMA has been superficially audited each of the past 20 years. The audit is provided with limited data by IWMA manager William Worrell, according to the audit firm.

IWMA BoardAfter board vice-chair Tom O’Malley, an Atascadero council member, suggested an audit be conducted by their usual auditor and IWMA counsel Ray Biering, Gibson responded, “Why even go with an audit?”

IWMA board member and Arroyo Grande Councilman Tim Brown disagreed with Hill’s and Gibson’s arguments that a basic audit is sufficent noting that the misspending that occurred at the South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District could have been uncovered years earlier if a forensic audit had been done.

“I disagree. We need a full-throated discussion about an audit. We need a through review.”

Following a contentious discussion, the board nevertheless voted unanimously to place on its next meeting agenda in September a discussion of an audit designed to deep examine the agency’s fiscal practices and also a review of the IWMA’s joint powers agreement.

Neglect by the IWMA board has nurtured questionable spending and accounting habits on the part of IWMA’s management. Major capital outlays have had no authorization from, or oversight by, the 13-member board of directors, Hall wrote. He suggested that the board’s stewardship of taxpayer dollars has been seriously inadequate over the agency’s lifetime.

The annual audit of the IWMA, conducted last year by the Glenn Burdette firm, concluded with the auditors’ disclaimer that despite its “responsibility to express opinions of (IWMA’s) financial statements,” the firm could “express no such opinion on the effectiveness of (IWMA’s) internal control.” The firm said it could not “provide any assurance on the information (provided by IWMA) because limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.”

Hall said he is a “concerned citizen” who has been “assisting a group that has been investigating IWMA.”

Hall told the board that “we have found huge accounting discrepancies and irregularities. Your administrator (Worrell) destroys critical accounting records without approval from the board.

What does it say when this same administrator is buying trucks and forklifts without authorization and giving them to select garbage companies and questionably contracted vendors? What does it say when your administrator gives huge amounts of money to vendors that don’t exist?”

It says, according to Hall, that the board “has an administrator with no regard for the law and (who has) serious conflicts of interest.”

Wayne Hall’s letter to the IWMA Board of Directors:

[scribd id=380174602 key=key-Vx3j2pwkZTYWABgzBuia mode=scroll]

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Now thats pretty interesting, those two hacks don’t want an audit, that seems like a real good reason right there to move forward with one.

I so wish I had been there to hear what was reported to be a screaming match of the board members opposed to the audit…Adam Hill, Bruce Gibson, Jeff Lee, or even to have seen the video or listened to the audio record. But of course, this is the only agency in SLO County that does not videotape meetings, and reportedly, destroys audiotapes immediately following meetings. Grover Beach mayoral candidate, Jeff Lee is the chair and has been the chair for the past 3 years.

What are Hill and Gibson trying to hide? Where there’s smoke there’s fire. Keep diggimg…

Add LEE from GB corrupt list.

Lord help us all of Paulding is elected and gives Hill and Gibson another leg for the progressive tripod.

Once again let’s follow the money. You have to ask, with all of the wrong doings being exposed thru out the county, why would anyone be against an audit. Some are saying it’s too expensive, now when have you ever heard in body in government say that and at the same time hide behind a piece of paper?

I tend to believe that Wayne Hall is qualified to make such assessments. You have to wonder why our roads and relegated safety issues are put on a calendar then removed due to the lack of funding yet there is funding for other pet projects? Unilateral shifting of public funds?

Why oh why would Adam Hill be hiding his face, or taking photos of speakers?

When are the people with the white jackets coming for him?

Please let it be soon.

Maybe he’s having another “episode.”

Hall’s letter is pretty damning of IWA and Bill Worrell. If the board doesn’t do an audit, he should take his complaints/evidence to the Grand Jury.