California’s $3.5 billion liability for workers’ unused time off

March 8, 2019

With California state workers hoarding vacation days and other time off and often receiving six-figure payouts for doing so, taxpayers are faced with another massive liability, in addition to pension debt. [LA Times]

According to the most recent estimate available, which was released in 2017, state workers have accrued $3.5 billion in pay for unused time off. In 2018 alone, California paid state workers nearly $300 million for banked time off, based on limited data available.

Last year’s data includes most state agencies and departments, but not legislative employees or other taxpayer-funded institutions like the public university systems. So, the total cost to taxpayers of accrued time off that was cashed out in 2018 was probably much higher than $300 million.

In 2018, a prison surgeon in Riverside received the largest payout for unused vacation and other leave. The prison surgeon pocketed $456,002.

Bijan Sartipi retired last year after working for 36 years as a transportation engineer, including a stint as the director of Caltrans in Alameda County. Sartipi received a payout of $405,119 for unused time off.

Sartipi’s payout was the equivalent of more than 4,400 hours of vacation. Sartipi retired with an annual salary of $191,208.

Last year, more than 450 state workers received six-figure checks for unused time off when they left their jobs. The amount of six-figure payouts marked a 60 percent rise since 2012, when 280 workers cashed out $100,000 or more of unused paid leave.

Vacation payouts can surpass annual salaries for some employees, such as Sartipi. The cost of each vacation hour increases over time because state labor code requires employers to compensate workers for unused time off based on the employees’ final pay rate, not what they were earning when the hours were accrued.

Many of the employees who receive the highest payouts receive raises toward the end of their employment with the state.

Sartipi received a 4 percent raise in his final years of work, giving him an additional $15,000 for unused time off.

When state employees cash out their banked leave, the state government not only pays them for the hours they have on the books, but also for a projected total of additional time they would have earned had they taken the days off. Hence, an employee with 640 hours of vacation would also be paid for all of the vacation and holidays they would have earned had they taken those 80 days off.

The rising accrued vacation liability stems from an increasing number of state workers retiring and lax enforcement of California’s cap on pay for unused time off. California mandates vacation balances for most employees be capped at 640 hours, though the rule is only sporadically enforced.

By contrast, most private sector employers cap accrued vacation between 40 and 400 hours and do not allow workers to earn time beyond those limits.

Some state departments have tried to mitigate the vacation balance by offering employees the opportunity to cash out up to 80 hours of accrued time off each year, thus reducing the likelihood of a larger payout when workers retire at a higher salary. Over a three-year period ending in 2017, the state wrote checks totaling $111 million in attempt to reduce vacation balances.

State Sen. John Moorlach (R-Costa Mesa) said reforming California’s vacation policy would help contain liabilities, but he does not believe doing so is politically feasible.

“I doubt Gavin Newsom will go to the bargaining table to see if he can fix it,” Moorlach said. “Our governors are very reliant on public employee union contributions, so this is just not going to happen.”

California’s powerful public-sector unions gave large contributions to Gov. Newsom, as well as to Democratic lawmakers, who have super-majorities in both houses of the Legislature. Changes to public-sector union contracts must be negotiated at the direction of the governor and approved by the Legislature.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

There should be a cap on state employee retirements. Overtime and unused sick time should not count. Workers are given sick time and vacation time to help them cope with life, not to just get more money in the end. Use it and be a good employee returning to the job refreshed, or lose it; apparently you didn’t need that time for its stated purpose. It is a known fact that people work better when they have time off; but greedy employees go in anyway and make more in the end for being less efficient while there. Go figure.

CalPERS is woefully underfunded, SLO city owes $160,000,000 and counting. Recent court rulings have stated than pensions can be reduced in bankruptcy (federal ruling) and a state ruling has said employees can’t purchase additional retirement credit- “air time” – to bulk up their pensions at taxpayers’ expense. Prior to this they could buy an additional five years’ service credit. What a racket.

Most of these jobs pay pretty well with health insurance and other benefits. Government was never meant to make millionaires out of blue collar workers but was to provide a secure, reasonable middle-class livelihood. Why cops, managers et al need six figures in retirement is beyond me when they’ve made a good salary all along and had medical, dental, vision insurance, etc. all paid for. Great gig if you can get it!

EVERY California tax payer should be required to go to California Transparent, on the internet, and see what kind of retirements some of these people are getting. Small town police chiefs and fire chiefs that had 20 people to supervise are drawing down retirements in excess of $100,000 a year. Then on top of that since theyretire at 50 many get another government job and double dip. So as Jackie Gleason would say, “how sweet it is.”

On a local level, consider the Paso Robles Joint Unified School District…