Parole policy harmful to victims of violent crime

August 16, 2021

SLO District Attorney Dan Dow

Opinion by SLO County District Attorney Dan Dow

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s Board of Parole Hearings is proposing a new policy requiring crime victims to notify the board of their intent to participate in a parole hearing at least 30 days before the hearing date.

This policy is especially problematic due to recent changes in parole eligibility for prison inmates. In the last 10 years, beginning with AB 109, continuing with Prop. 57 and SB 260, among others, the law has changed drastically regarding the time inmates spend incarcerated and when they are eligible for parole. As it stands, it’s already extremely difficult to determine when an individual inmate may become eligible for a parole hearing.

Additionally, there is no firmly established time frame in which the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) informs a district attorney of a parole hearing date, who would in turn notify the victims, that an inmate has an upcoming hearing.

Once the CDCR does notify the district attorney, great efforts are made to locate and inform victims of the potential parole hearing date. Often it takes significant time and resources to locate victims, particularly in older cases. Smaller counties are especially burdened by this task – though it’s not easy even for large counties.

A 30-day timetable is far too short to accommodate the task of locating victims and preparing them for the re-traumatization of appearing before the person who caused them such immeasurable grief.

“This new policy hurts the people who most deserve to be treated with dignity, respect, and compassion – the victims of violent crime,” said District Attorney Dan Dow. “Crime victims do not volunteer for their role. They didn’t want to be part of the crime. To expect crime victims to track the changes in the board’s administrative procedures, or other laws that benefit only inmates is simply unfair and unjust.”

A representative from the San Luis Obispo County District Attorney’s Office, along with several other district attorney’s offices, is attending the online hearing by the Board of Parole Hearings today at 1 p.m. to voice our objection to the proposed regulations.

If this regulation is passed and implemented, the board will be on record as disregarding the rights of crime victims and ignoring the objectives of Marsy’s Law, also known as the Crime Victim’s Bill of Rights, as passed by California voters in 2008.

“We encourage the Board of Parole Hearings to reject this regulation which would require victims to suffer more injustice than they already have,” Dow said.

Please contact Assistant District Attorney Eric J. Dobroth at (805) 781.5819 with any questions.

Visit our website for more information on the Crime Victim’s Bill of Rights.


Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment

Nothing else to do Dan ? you are just trying to scare people . You already got your bottom kicked in the Tiana case. Parollee paid their debt to society.Your opinion is similar to Cunningham flyers about human trafficking.Both of you have nothing to show in term of carrier achievement so you choose a subject and inflate it to your advantage.Your are a demagogue.


Dan – really glad you feel this way. any chance you could get as worked up about the corruption taking place right under you nose?


Or when it comes to rapist cops or constitutional violations and actions by a cop who loses her gun.


Dan,as usual you make a mountain out of a molehill.

Why don’t you simply ask the victims at the time of sentencing the felon if they want to be notified if they come up for parole?

It is called a database. You type in the felon’s name and bam you get the victim identification list. One they can can update online BTW. You can get an intern from Poly to set it up.


Don’t put all your hope on a police database, just ask the guy who’s brother used his name committing illegal activities, the guy went through all the hoops to get his name clear to end up with a database error and having former Chief Cantrell’s storm troopers arrest him even though he had the proper “papers”, so much for carrying your papers…….