Paso Robles City Council needs to discuss the difficult issues

August 8, 2024

Paso Robles City Councilman Chris Bausch

OPINION by CHRIS BAUSCH

“Mayor John Hamon made a statement at the beginning of Tuesday night’s meeting, apologizing to police staff for what he called “disgusting, uncalled for,” remarks made by a city council member in regard to the recent decision about dogs being allowed in public parks,” according to an Aug. 7 article in the Paso Robles Daily News.

Hamon said that the remarks were, “not in the best interest of the city” and were an attack on the police force and their efforts to consistently enforce city laws. Which exact comments he was referring to were not explicitly stated. Watch the meeting’s live stream of the remark, fast forward to 1:41, here.

In response to Hamon’s apology to Police Commander Ricky Lehr for comments Hamon found “uncivil, disgusting and uncalled for,” and “not in the best interest of the city,” I ask the reader to please judge for yourself. Please watch the discussion of Item J-12, Repealing Ordinance No. 489, Restricting Dogs in Public Places at the July 16 City Council Meeting, by forwarding to 3:46 on the video found here.

For the record, I met with Police Chief Damian Nord before the July 16 meeting and shared with him my intent. He said in essence to proceed and he would respond appropriately. Furthermore, I believe in, support and appreciate the hard work and long hours our city staff, especially our police and fire personnel provide to Paso Roblans.

However, my unwavering support does not diminish my responsibility to be critical when necessary seeking answers to questions posed by the community at large.

So why was Mayor Hamon compelled to apologize for my remarks? This is the third time that Hamon has called me out for my behavior on the dais. The first was for following Robert’s Rules of Order, calling for the question. According to Hamon, only the mayor can call for the question. He is wrong, anyone can call for the question.

For the second time, Mayor Hamon was joined by City Manager Ty Lewis when I was chastised for calling staff “staff” and using the word “disingenuous” to describe the inability for the city to find parking violators information in order to issue refunds. As it turns out, the city did in fact have the information all along as was confirmed by the city manager only two weeks later. As everyone knows, Staff is still “staff.”

So why this third time? Normally, the city manager would have communicated the council’s displeasure privately and directly to an offending council member. I speak from experience.  However, because I have been informed by City Attorney Elizabeth Hull since last May not to meet, email, or contact the city manager due to a pending investigation, that wasn’t an option.

If you have already reviewed my questions and subsequent comments to Commander Lehr, I was civil, I wasn’t disgusting and, according to many of my constituents and others on social media, most necessary.

Chief Nord decided to respond to the council for Commander Lehr. He answered my questions even convincing Councilman Strong to vote in favor of allowing dogs in our parks.

Neither Mayor Hamon, nor council members Gregory, Strong or Roden intervened to stop my questions on July 16 because an intervention would have been inappropriate relative to the nature of questions and comments.

It has been suggested that their newfound outrage was suggested to them by others only after the meeting.

For what reason? For me not being a team player? For not having my council meeting questions pre-approved by the city manager? For answering potential city council candidates’ questions? For voting against higher taxes? For worrying about injecting State Water into the Paso Basin?  For speaking out against retail cannabis sales? For complaining about the crime and faux cameras at the homeless encampment on Black Oak Dr? For asking that the Council support a 2/3 vote by the people to approve any tax increase? For helping to overturn Paid Parking? For bringing up paid parking yet again after the mayor never wanted to hear about it? For daring to ask that the city consider asking our legal counsel BBK and Dixon & Associates to reimburse citizens and thecCity for the mistakes allegedly made? Probably.

I believe I am once again being singled out for not being a rubber stamp, for asking difficult questions, and for listening and representing Paso Roblans first ahead of my own or others self-interests and personal agendas. After the Chris Williams fiasco at the Paso Robles School District, I am quite used to being persecuted for not being a rubber stamp. We know how that ended for the then superintendent and school board. If you don’t, please see the SLO County Grand Jury report, A Cautionary Tale and its aftermath.

November elections are upon us. Change, even potential change, makes people, especially politicians, nervous. Others are nervous that a shift in the city council could be detrimental.

You know what else makes some people nervous? Apparently, their actions. Alleged violations regarding license plates, violating your opponent’s civil rights, and selling a business to even a wonderful buyer might be cause for concern.

If you are concerned about the direction of the City of Paso Robles, please vote in person this November. If you want things to change, please vote to replace those in office.

 


Loading...
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I think this is related to the dogs issue. It’s really important that dogs be under control. My understanding and correct me if I am wrong but this has something to do with Chris wanting to keep dogs under control in public parks. My massage therapist had her dog on a leash at Barney Schwartz Park on July 4th when they were confronted by two dogs that were not controlled. Her dog ran and pulled so hard on the leash that her finger was severely injured to the point where she had to see a hand specialist in Santa Barbara. Her finger will never be the same. Chris Bausch is consistently on the side of the people, protects the interests of the taxpayers and is the lone voice against corruption and the good ol’ boy network. He makes great points. Thanks Christ for enlightening us.


I appreciate the input, Chris. I have sent letters to the city council, asking what they are doing for the citizens of Paso Robles. The replies were rude and completely off topic. As I said, in my letter “have fun, when Paso Robles is a ghost town except for tourists and winos.” The reply? “I hope that doesn’t happen .” Vote them out!!!


This article reads like a slice of Swiss cheese there are so many holes in every disparate story. So much performative inflexiblity. It seems like Bausch is intentionally being hard to work with for the anti-institutional vote rather than being a problem solver for every day, non-weird constituents.


Also what’s with the last line about voting in person? What if someone has work and kids to take care of, has limited transportation, or is traveling that weekend? Bausch doesn’t want their vote I guess. Are the black helicopters out to get you? Is the deep state coding messages to you in the back of cereal boxes?


Voting in person in case you did not know is the best way to ensure election integrity. People died to give you the right to vote and if you can’t make it in person then maybe you don’t deserve to vote. What an attitude.


Look up Paso Robles on Transparent California. There IS one big issue the city council needs to address. For the money these people make that town should be the best ran in the state.


I support Councilman Bausch. His interest has always been what is best for the people. He is trustworthy and will stand up for what is right.

I too worked at Paso District and saw first hand how former superintendent Chris Williams bullied and threatened anyone who didn’t agree with him. As we all put it, “drink the koolaid”. Chris Bausch never drank the koolaid and Williams then had a target.


That seems to be a thing with Hamon as well. Perhaps he’s buddies with Williams and they have beers at the brewery Williams opened up with school funds.


Councilman Bausch has proven time and time again through the years how well his character stands. I stand behind him.


And to the other person commenting – Tatro? As in DARE officer Tatro? Shouldn’t you be sleeping with someone else’s wife on school grounds? Say a fifth grade teacher?


well said


I support Paso Robles City Councilman Chris Bausch.


Paso Robles Mayor John Haman ought to stick to garage door openers, and his decidedly anti-democratic bent is more in line with Soviet Russia than our country. Paso Robles City Councilman Chris Bausch has EVERY right to represent his consituents, and for Haman to act as if he is above questioning is pathetic.


In November, vote for democracy, vote out people like John Haman.


I read this article and now feel dumber for doing so. A long ass article on some ridiculous butt hurt feelings from a City Councilman on dogs in the park. Get over yourself princess, nobody cares.


Thank you Officer Tatro. Good to hear from you again. Are you still writing tickets or were you able to retire?


I’ve been retired for 12 years thanks, now I’m just one of your constituents wanting you and the rest of the council to quit playing “mean girls games” and fix the damn roads.


Deep thoughts…


Sounds like the police department needs to add some communications training to its officers.