Homelessness in our own backyard, San Luis Obispo County

November 8, 2024

Ben Jackson

OPINION by BEN JACKSON

California’s Gov. Gavin Newson filed a suit on Nov. 4 against Norwalk County, calling its ban on new homeless shelters “beyond cruel.” This comes at a time when nearly 30% of the nation’s 653,000 homeless reside in the state of California.

Nowadays, visiting San Francisco without seeing human feces is a rare occurrence. What’s the cause? A lack of affordable housing, the worsening mental health crisis, and a fatal drug and alcohol problem have led to an underserved homeless population.

Although displaced people are found in every corner of the globe, I believe we should address those in our backyard first. An increase in political priority for homelessness through the development of transitional centers with therapists and career coaches would be a necessary win-win scenario for both California and our country to tackle homelessness and the structural inequity that accompanies it.

The West, particularly the United States, is seen globally as both a pioneer and a champion of human rights, preaching “liberty and justice for all.” Why is it, then, that the number of people living on the streets with little or no access to sanitation, food, or water in this country equals the population of Wyoming?

A recent Harvard study notes that 92% of Americans agree that citizens should have a “right to the basic necessities of life.” This apparent human rights culture should, in theory, lead to human rights norms being respected. However, in reality, people and institutions tend to treat the homeless like animals, shooing them further and further from their backyards and avoiding contact at all costs. To me, this does not seem to match our national pledge of “justice for all.”

What’s causing this inequity? In my hometown of San Luis Obispo (SLO) on the Central Coast of California, part of the rapid rise in rates of homelessness can be attributed to the lack of affordable housing. SLO’s average housing prices sit 51.7% above the national average, only allowing 19% of families to afford a medium-priced home.

This lack of affordable housing leads to 38.6 out of 10,000 being homeless, which is double the national average. Being the second least affordable small-metro area in the nation and an area where job growth is forecast to be under 1% for the next few years, SLO is the definition of economically driven homelessness. Adding to this headwind, SLO residents hold a strong not in my backyard (NIMBY) sentiment due to worries about safety since the unsheltered have overtaken multiple areas downtown, such as public parks and trails.

So, where are the unsheltered supposed to go? Residents are firmly against their presence, and counties have not done enough to accommodate them- it’s turned into a lose-lose situation. However, there is an achievable solution.

As of 2019, SLO could shelter only 20-30% of people observed as homeless; hence, SLO proportionally has the third-largest unsheltered population in the nation and requires urgent solutions.

What’s needed is a renovation of vacant office spaces into a hostel-style transitional space with therapists and career coaches provided. After multiple weeks in these alternative shelters, career coaches could assist the unsheltered in getting into the workforce and then, gradually, graduating to state-sponsored fixed rent or subsidized affordable housing. I’m confident that this care and integration would eliminate homelessness and reverse some of the economic, social, and racial inequities that cause it.

In 2022, I had the opportunity to serve the Salvation Army in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Through conversations with rehab patients and ex-homeless, I learned of the desperate need for therapists and career coaches to help them deal with tasks like parenting, mental health, and job search.

One man in particular, named Red, had been to rehab 28 times, and none of it had been effective; he consistently relapsed. I’d argue that homeless shelters currently function similarly, patching a long-term problem with a band-aid solution. Red desperately craved advice on how to parent his daughter, who was 28 at the time (and already in jail). It’s our responsibility to listen to these calls for help and make doable changes to set people like Red and his children on an upward trajectory and free them from the generational cycle of poverty and instability.

One valid counterargument would come from the hardworking taxpayer who claims the fruits of their labor should not go to these transitional programs to help those who are perceived as lazy and have been destroyed by drugs and alcohol. Proactively addressing homelessness through offering structured support and career pathways would change lives and reduce costs in the long run, lessening the burden on taxpayers for homeless healthcare, law enforcement, and emergency services: a true win-win.

Red from Baton Rouge shared with me that he started selling drugs on behalf of his parents at age five. Age five! He had nearly zero chances of success from day one, so why should we blame him for his unfortunate past? The increasing wealth gap in the United States just adds to this intergenerational structural inequity we see today, which is solvable on a political level.

Article 17 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that no one should be arbitrarily deprived of his property, but we see that counties like Norwalk are currently banning the development of homeless shelters, the only property that the homeless can rely on. Gavin Newsom made it clear that he is an advocate for solving homelessness through his lawsuit of Norwalk. This rhetoric is a step in the right direction; however, I’m arguing that shelters are not enough- these people desperately need state-sponsored therapists and career coaches to talk through their problems and set them up for success.

Providing these transitional centers and resources in a community like SLO that experiences a staggering level of unsheltered homelessness is essentially a win-win for everyone. SLO’s homeless community will begin to heal, become integrated into the workforce, and hopefully graduate into fixed/subsidized rent affordable housing, building a life path on an upward trajectory. People like Red from Louisiana are all over the country- their voices need to be heard.

Ben Jackson is a lifelong San Luis Obispo County resident who is currently attending Boston College with a major in economics and international studies.

 


Loading...
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Just being a realist here, 99% still won’t pay a dime for affordable housing, I wish they would just call it what it is, taxpayer funded housing. Mental institutions need to be reopened so people can get the help they need, at least there is some accountability for where the money is being wasted.


Liberal democrat here. The homeless in our county migrate here because of they find it easy to survive here. Between the terrific weather, community services offered to them and plenty of people with pocket change to donate why would they go elsewhere. Counseling and a modest number of transitional houses for the few that truly show the desire to improve but for the rest, out of here they should go.


SLO’s homeless population,a good portion of them,are not in the category of can’t afford housing, they’re drifters that want their altered state of mind living under the stars.

The homeless problem just in this town is out of control,I make numerous trips to the Monterey Peninsula visiting family,another area a very pricey housing market,they have homeless but nothing like SLO.

Help the ones that want help,getting to a program to kick their addiction,housing and the ones that don’t want to get help,tell them to go back where they came from.

I’m beginning to think as the homeless population grows,that they are being dumped

or sent here from other Counties in California.


Ben, some good points here but this is not really an affordable housing problem and I cringe every time someone points to that as one of the more significant causes of homelessness. People who cannot afford to live in an area, that are not insane, or crazy, will merely go to a place that’s more affordable. That is what sane people do. In my own life and many people I know made that decision, as a rational, non substance addicted individual will make.


What we have here, locally and nationwide is a mental illness problem. Simply building “affordable housing” to warehouse theses poor souls will not solve the problem. we need to get back to a system of custodial arrangements (voluntary and involuntary) for mentally ill people on the street that includes in the best case months or a few years of therapy and treatment and care and in the worst case a lifetime of custodial care, and everything in between.


Just my opinion.


I really like Ben’s resolve of “Transitional Support Shelters”, for those who desire help, it sounds like a plan to me!! But there is a population of homeless that “Choose” to be homeless, believe it or not. These are the people that have zero interest in rehabilitation. Preferring the culture of homelessness to sheltered living. Choosing to live on the fringes of society, and not participating in what we call “normal living”. So what about those people? IS it illegal to be homeless? They are usually treated as such. Is it Justice if we don’t allow them to live as they are choosing? They are treated as “Deplorables”, and casted off from the parks and underpasses where they do find their “shelter”? Is that Justice to tell them they can NOT live as They please? Honestly, I find it difficult to understand this culture, and their desire to be Free from normal housed society. But, they are also Americans, free to choose to live as they see fit, right?


You’ll never solve a problem by dumping an endless amount of money into it with no oversight or accountability. The audit report earlier this year showed 24 billion was spent over 5 yrs on homelessness with pretty much no oversight on the results. Then Newsom recently vetoed the homeless accountability bill from the legislature that would have required better oversight on the money being spent on homelessness.


What it is in reality is a big money laundering scheme. Who profits off of the “homeless”?


ah to be young and idealistic.


“Affordable housing” means creating slums for lower income people to reside in an area that they normally wouldn’t be able to afford. It is creating an artificial means for businesses to continue paying wages below an amount that would allow an individual to reside in the area


Let the free market function. Stop hampering it.


How many of the homeless in SLO County have ever had a residence here, how many are transient, that came here from other counties or states that will not provide services and support?