Attorneys were the judges: Ratings for SLO County judges

March 9, 2025

By KAREN VELIE

The San Luis Obispo County Bar Association recently released a survey in which participants ranked local judges on their professionalism, efficiency and knowledge of the law.

Even though 77 attorneys participated in the poll, very few voted for some of the newer judges or commissioners. Even so, the Bar Association determined  the overall participation “was significant and therefore provides validity to the results.”

CalCoastNews listed the judges by lowest to highest overall rating. The overall score is not the average of the participant’s ratings, but rather the participant’s rating of the judicial officer’s overall performance.

Judge Tana Coates

Judge Tana Coates received an overall rating of 7.30. Her lowest scores were 6.55 for rules decisively and 6.96 for efficiency in courtroom management.

Coates’ top scores were 9.02 for courteous and attentive in the courtroom and 8.20 for judicial demeanor.

Judge Erin Childs

Judge Erin Childs received an overall rating of 7.53. Her lowest scores were 7.24 for follows the law and 7.29 for quality of work product.

Childs’ top scores were 8.13 for ability to handle pretrial matters and 7.94 for courteous and attentive in the courtroom.

Judge Michael Frye

Judge Michael Frye received an overall rating of 7.33. His lowest scores were 6.89 for efficiency in courtroom management, 7.11 for controls for bias/fairness and 7.11 for rules decisively.

Frye’s top scores were 10.00 for quality of work product and 9.00 for judicial demeanor.

Judge Timothy Covello

Judge Timothy Covello received an overall rating of 7.53. His lowest scores were 7.20 for judicial demeanor and 7.47 for courteous and attentive in the courtroom.

Covello’s top scores were 8.67 for rules decisively and 8.50 for ability to handle pretrial matters.

Judge Matthew Guerrero

Judge Matthew Guerrero received an overall rating of 7.83. His lowest scores were 7.33 for follows the law and 7.39 for understands the law.

Guerrero’s top scores were 8.69 for courteous and attentive in the courtroom and 8.34 for judicial demeanor.

Judge Catherine Swysen 

Judge Catherine Swysen received an overall rating of 8.00. Her lowest scores were 6.67 for efficiency in courtroom management and 7.88 for ability to handle pretrial matters.

Swysen’s top scores were 9.33 for understands the law and 9.33 for quality of written work product.

Commissioner Leslie Kraut

Commissioner Leslie Kraut received an overall rating of 8.22. Her lowest scores were 8.00 for quality of written work product and 8.11 for understands the law.

Kraut’s top scores were 9.25 for ability to handle pretrial matters and 8.46 for courteous and attentive in the courtroom.

Judge Rita Federman

Judge Rita Federman received an overall rating of 8.34. Her lowest scores were 7.87 for efficiency in courtroom management and 8.18 for controls for bias/fairness.

Federman’s top scores were 8.95 for quality of written work product and 8.69 for judicial demeanor.

Judge Gail Peron

Judge Gail Peron received an overall rating of 8.38. Her lowest scores were 8.15 for judicial demeanor, 8.23 for courteous and attentive in the courtroom, 8.23 for preparedness and  8.23 for rules decisively.

Peron’s top scores were 8.55 for ability to handle pretrial matters and 8.46 for follows the law.

Judge Jacquelyn Duffy

Judge Jacquelyn Duffy received an overall rating of 8.68. Her lowest scores were 8.45 for controls for bias/fairness and 8.55 for follows the law.

Duffy’s top scores were 9.41 for judicial demeanor and 9.27 for courteous and attentive in the courtroom.

Judge Michael Kelley 

Judge Michael Kelley received an overall rating of 8.79. His lowest scores were 8.63 for follows the law and 8.81 for understands the law.

Kelley’s top scores were 9.18 for courteous and attentive in the courtroom and 9.16 for preparedness.

Judge Jessie Marino 

Judge Jessie Marino received an overall rating of 8.92. His lowest scores were 8.55 for preparedness and 8.73 for understands the law.

Marino’s top scores were 10.00 for quality of written work product and 9.55 for courteous and attentive in the courtroom.

Commissioner Kenneth McDaniel

Commissioner Kenneth McDaniel received an overall rating of 9.00. His lowest scores were 8.73 for efficiency in courtroom management and 8.73 for rules decisively.

McDaniel’s top scores were 9.36 for ability to handle pretrial matters, 9.27 for judicial demeanor and 9.27 for quality of written work product.

Judge Craig van Rooyen

Judge Craig van Rooyen received an overall rating of 9.04. His lowest scores were 8.64 for follows the law and 8.86 for understands the law.

Van Rooyen’s top scores were 9.57 for judicial demeanor and 9.50 for ability to conduct trial.

Judge Crystal Seiler

Judge Crystal Seiler received an overall rating of 9.27. Her lowest scores were 8.64 for efficiency in courtroom management and 8.91 for controls in bias/fairness.

Seiler’s top scores were 9.73 for follows the law and 9.73 for preparedness.

Because we believe the public needs the facts, the truth, CalCoastNews has not put up a paywall because it limits readership. However, we are seeking qualification as a paper of record, which will allow us to publish public notices, but it requires 5,000 paid subscribers.

Your subscription will help us to continue investigating and reporting the news.

Support CalCoastNews, subscribe today, click here.

 


Loading...
15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Federman is a great judge. It is scary that a person like Childs can be considered a judge. Federman is fair and smart. Childs is absolutely terrifying for any parent in the family court system. It is unfortunate that someone like Federman is not in family court in her place. I am not familiar with the new persons in family court, but I have heard Peron was a fair judge and liked.


100% agree with you about Childs. I had a deeply unpleasant experience with her as I was attempting to get a restraining order against my own daughter to protect our family after we adopted her baby who had been removed by CPS. Childs refused to include my husband in the order. “He can get his own restraining order.” The whole process (during the madness and chaos that was Covid) took three months, and she acted like it was no big deal. Very rude and dismissive and wouldn’t let me speak to defend myself against the nonsense my daughter was spewing. I couldn’t understand her priorities.


ERIN CHILDS IS THE WORST JUDGE I’VE EVER SEEN ON THE BENCH. I’m not personally affected, thank goodness, but feel sorry for anyone stuck with her. Terrible rulings, biased, and all-around horrible judge. She ran unopposed. Someone please run against her!


Unopposed for judge – before she was a commissioner that snuck in.

She is ruining kids’ (and parents’) lives with her lack of knowledge of the law. It is criminal what is going on at that courthouse…


Saw “wealthy” attorneys cite case law; and Child’s entertained it as foundation. Then a “regular” attorney cites case law to set foundation and she acts like “following the law is a waste of time for the court”. It’s sad, how others here are directly and indirectly hurt by Childs Odd appointment and lack of Judicial Ethics.


Reddit forum as well folks so the people can collaborate about this, share this, and report her in group to the BAR for judicial review and misconduct. If one person does it Means Jack All, if 100 do, she might get “scolded”…….


Craig van Rooyen hates women, as has repeatedly been demonstrated both while he was a DA and even more so now.


First hand experience involving the most transparent case With Erin Childish; She doesn’t care about the law, and will let someone who has committed 60 documented crimes equating to 60 years jail and fines; walk free; whilst being a rude *itch. And ignoring attorneys whilst doing so. End Immunity. Not sure if it’s Masojany, just, Mental deficiency.


This judge will make up laws as she talks to herself. She is a disgrace to all judges and an embarrassment to our county courthouse.


Its difficult to decipher when we are not sure what the ratings mean. Is the highest rating 10?


This is meaningless. Who were the attorneys, defense or prosecutors or both? Was it a secret ballot? How were the attorneys selected? Doesn’t really matter. As Charles said, this is just like Oscar’s et.al. A bunch of judicial LEOs get together, smile and slap each other on the back, and tell each other what a good job they are doing jn an industry that thrives on the misery of others.


This really does matter. We the people should really consider voting the poorest performing Judges out of office. Attorneys that have nerve and a willingness to serve should throw their hat in the ring and running against the worst performing Judges. Every 6 years they are up for re-election. Would someone please show some guts and willingness to serve and run for Judge, please.


Childs voted herself in. She was blackballed by the attorneys in San Luis Obispo and found a loophole.


Perfect example of the foxes guarding the hen house.


Yelp reviews for judges???

So…what is the general public supposed to do with this information? Are we allowed to choose our judge based upon these reviews? Will there be some sort of awards show where we hand out little golden gavels?

“And the Golden Gavel for Best courtroom organization for a superior court judge goes to…”


The Robing Room is a forum that allows the general public to rate and comment on their judges.


The Honorable Tana Coates and Ginger Garrett Robing Room public comments and ratings (links below) are eye opening.


http://www.therobingroom.com/texas/Judge.aspx?id=24523


http://www.therobingroom.com/newjersey/Judge.aspx?id=3499


Did Don Ernst or Jan Marx have any participation in determining the rating criteria or framework of survey questions for this Judicial survey by the local bar?


Did public or bar member’s client opinion’s factor into the survey questions and ratings?