There is no but, political assassinations have no place in our society

September 15, 2025

Charlie Kirk

OPINION by BOB SHANBROM

As a self-professed San Francisco-progressive, I’ve been getting a lot of social media feeds that read like this: “I condemn the killing of Charlie Kirk but… .” There are no buts about this assassination.

A family will wonder for the rest of their lives when daddy is coming home. Someone who was a hero to many was taken from their lives. Our nation has taken another step toward the brink.

Agree with Charlie Kirk or not, he was exercising his constitutional right to free speech. For those too-many of us who would argue, “but it was hateful,” we need to remind ourselves that the First Amendment isn’t there to protect acceptable speech, it is there to protect “offensive” speech.

Frankly, although I read widely–not widely enough, I didn’t know of Charlie Kirk at all before Sept. 10. As I watch and read the obituaries and retrospectives come in I am seeing a clip that contains some valuable insight, that leftists need to return to their liberal roots, especially free speech.

To that I would add pacifism and the rejection of hatred, what MLK preached. I never feel prouder of my nation than when the ACLU defends the KKK on its right to free speech, despicable as it may be.

We are conceived as a nation *under law* where open discourse is enshrined in the very first amendment. As one of our godparents, Voltaire, is attributed to have said, “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

We need to mourn the victims of political assassinations and to reject political assassination without any ifs, ands or buts–just a period.

Bob Shanbrom is a community activist who lives in San Luis Obispo.

 


Loading...
34 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Good piece, Bob, and I agree with you that there should be no butts on this subject. Too bad so many respondents below seem so insistent on showing theirs…. ;)


Sharpton, Obama, Colbert, Rogan, Musk, Guttfeld, doing the same thing. Would you celebrate their death? They are all targets for fringe assassins motivated by political rhetoric. Gifford, Paulding, Dow, or anyone trying to make a difference. WTF, condemn these actions with all your heart- please!


Condem these actions? But what put these individuals on the “pulpit”? I suspect examining this will yield far more results than loving or hating any of them.


A “control system”? A “management system”?


Our society is “redirect based”…


Just a human trying to change the common narrative he didn’t agree with. Kind of like all commenters are doing here, except he was doing it in a highly intelligent way with great success. Shouldn’t be killed for his opinion and willingness to debate.


Bob has gotten it right. His concepts and expressions are sound, but those jumping in with the pitchforks and torches are the reason good people from all sides are not free to express themselves. It becomes shrill, personal, and vitriolic. Thank you, Bob, for your wisdom and courage to speak out against a cancer that is real and threatening our democracy, the ability to opine freely. You’re a good man.


“Is it real, or is it Memorex?”


I compared Charlie Kirk with MLK too the other day. I was asking someone “Why is the media treating this guy like MLK?”


Because both of them promoted instability??? And growth cannot occur without stability??? I don’t know, but that would be me starting place…


Martin Luther King promoted instability? Not the one I learned and read about. Don’t remember him “promoting” anything. And did you mean “grown cannot occur without INstability?”


“growth cannot occur without INstability?”


Are you really at home right now “mourning” the loss of a podcaster you just found out about? An opportunistic conspiracy theorist that amassed $12 million for spreading sexism, racism and misinformation? What stage of mourning are you in? How much longer do you think you’ll be in mourning?