San Luis Obispo County places political action committee on notice

April 24, 2026

District Attorney Dan Dow

By KAREN VELIE

San Luis Obispo County District Attorney Dan Dow on Wednesday put the treasure of a political action committee that supports the reelection of Supervisor Jimmy Paulding on notice regarding serious concerns over their compliance with election laws.

The South County Coalition was formed on March 26 by its treasurer Dorothy Hines, a Nipomo woman who served as treasurer for Jimmy Paulding’s 2022 campaign committee. Hines identified the coalition as a county general purpose committee and described its activity as an “advocate for candidates in South San Luis Obispo County.”

In his letter, Dow points out that the coalition’s independent expenditure reports show only support for Paulding’s reelection, which would make the coalition a primarily formed committee with stricter reporting requirements.

In the coalition’s April 13 Form 496 filing, it failed to report that retired attorney Ray Mattison donated $18,000 on March 24, and that attorney Don Ernst donated $22,002 on March 25, a day before the coalition filed its statement of organization.

“The close timing of those substantial contributions and the committee’s campaign spending in support of Mr. Paulding strongly suggests that the committee’s actual purpose and recent activity are directed toward supporting a single identified candidate rather than generally supporting multiple south county candidates,” Dow wrote. “California law does not permit a committee to retain ‘general purpose committee’ status when, in substance, it exists to support a single identified candidate in a single election.”

Dow’s letter directs Hines to immediately:

• Review the committee’s current legal status and determine whether it is in fact primarily formed to support Paulding.
• If so, promptly file an amended Form 410 accurately identifying the committee as a primarily formed committee.
• Immediately review whether all qualifying late contributions have been timely and accurately reported under the rules applicable to primarily formed committees, and if not, file any required amended or supplemental reports without delay.
• Review all advertisements, mailers, and communications paid for by the committee to ensure compliance with applicable sender identification and advertisement disclosure requirements, including any top-donor disclosure rules that may apply.
• Preserve all records relating to committee formation, donor solicitations, contributions received, expenditures made, vendor communications,advertisement approvals, and any communications reflecting the committee’s purpose, candidate targeting, or intended electoral activity.
• Ensure that no filing made with the Secretary of State, county elections office, or the FPPC contains material omissions or inaccuracies regarding the committee’s true purpose, contributors, or expenditures

If Hines determines the coalition is properly classified, she needs to be prepared to substantiate with documentation, according to Dow.

“Please provide written confirmation no later than close of business within five calendar days that the committee has reviewed these issues, identified the steps it will take to comply with California law, and preserved all potentially relevant records,” the letter demands.

 


Loading...
19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

And the final part that the SLOC D.A. cannot state on recor is, DO NOT VOTE DEMONCRAT, EVER AGAIN. #WakeUp #WalkAway


#NEVERVoteDemoNcratAgain


Californians Against DemoNcrats!


#SaveSLOCounty

#SaveCalifornia


#VoteRepublican2026


There is a political hack on the BOS, but that’s OK because that person leans right. No surprise whatsoever Dow is going after an organization supporting someone leaning left.


Typical. “Dow is racist! Dow is Christian! Dow is right wing! Dow supports law enforcement!……….uh………..no Kings!!”


Ikr


REEEEEEEEE!


“The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.” -Ronald Reagan, 1964


Not.


Seems in the past that Dow has been pretty easy on the wrongdoers and counsel involved in quite a many Community Facilities Districts – Los Osos, San Simeon, IWMA for starters –


There is an anchor baby of an ILLEGAL INVADER on the BOS and two (2) others that smile, ignore and imbibe that foreign influencer.


Huge donations from a “ retired” attorney and another one?…..Why? ….For? …. For…whom?


To Dan Dow…. Better late to the party than never


A bit harsh, perhaps. If I read the stories correctly, the PAC was only formed on 3-26-26, and the form 496 ( ?) filed on 4-13-26. If the filing seems fishy, the DA’s office then has to review facts and filings against legal requirements, and determine appropriate actions from there – like the letter the DA sent giving the PAC an opportunity to correct filing issues.


To do otherwise, or to move faster, could be construed as partisanship by the DA’s office. I think the DA’s response to date has been correct and timely.


If the county didn’t have a history of corrupt and questionable political actions with little or no consequences it would deter someone from trying to do it again. The best way to prevent criminals is to show you aggressively investigate, prosecute and penalize, with jail time when needed, questionable and criminal activity, but DA Dow’s history is not that, Wallace, Hill and Harmon for example and there are many others.


The DA’s office sent the letter within 9 days of the PAC filing – pretty fast work from initial review to the letter. Acknowledge the point.Your criticism of the DA’s timing is baseless.


We will have to agree to disagree, have a wonderful weekend.


We usually see eye-to-eye on politics and normal life. But, this time you’re wrong. Dow has reacted admiringly quick on this.


Accepted enthusiasm the caveat that DD acted quickly in this case.


If it’s about what have you done for me lately, there we go.


Edit: with the caveat…


Not “enthusiasm”


Jimmy Paulding positioned himself as the reformer who cut individual donation limits to reduce influence. Now a PAC with ties to his former campaign team and partners is pouring in money while facing scrutiny. Even if it turns out to be legal, this kills any trust I had in Jimmy.


Why the need to be so sneaky. How about a straight-forward, honest election for once.


You want a honest election, elect a new County Clerk.


#NEVERVoteDemoNcratAgain


#VoteRepublican2026


#Vote4VanessaRozo

for SLOC Clerk