Movie review: Oz the Great and Powerful

March 21, 2013


Oz the Great and Powerful looked so very promising with its bright colors and cast of stars. The finished product, however, suffers greatly from those very same elements.

For clarification, Oz the Great and Powerful is not a remake of, but rather a prequel to, the Wizard of Oz (1939) that we all know and love. And even then, this film is supposed to be based directly on L. Frank Baum’s children’s books, since the 1939 Wizard of Oz film’s rights are still tightly held by Warner Brothers. Disney reportedly was careful not to infringe on the iconic film, but within Oz the Great and Powerful, any viewer can match the similarities, even if the Wicked Witch is a slightly different shade of green.

As a big Disney production, the animation blends fairly well with live action, the CGI blossoms, and the 3D rendering is stunning for most of the film. The flying baboons are frightening and most likely why the film carries a PG rating.

Though bright and shiny, I don’t feel as if the grand scale of production matched with the story. The scenes seemed fragmented, as if there were transition pieces trimmed out to fit the film into the two-hour range it ends up occupying. The storyline is a simple god-vs.-evil set up, but the execution is muddled, leaving you sympathizing with the bad girls and not really liking the designated good guy. Maybe Disney is crossing into the postmodern. I wish they wouldn’t.

About those witches, Glinda, played by the angelic Michelle Williams, is the best character in the whole movie. She’s smart enough to see through the shenanigans of the wizard but kind enough to believe in him in spite of his ineptitude. What bothers me about Glinda is that she doesn’t use her wits and charm to take back the Emerald City on her own.

The two witches who may or may not be evil are played by Mila Kunis and Rachel Weisz. Kunis appears to have forgotten how to act. Weisz does a better job of being a children’s evil queen-type, though I think she’s also a confusing character. These two witches are jealous and not clever, making them poor villains in my book.

Lastly, there’s Oz himself, the small-time magician turned great and powerful wizard played by James Franco. He’s not right for the role at all. He’s flat. It’s as if he’s too good to be participating in the adventure. As an adult, I think Franco kills whatever charm the movie could have had. Watching Oz the Great and Powerful as a children’s movie, I think there would be enough entertainment value from the graphics and supporting characters to keep littler crowds engaged, but the heart I had hoped to find is absent. The Tin Man had more cardiac activity.

I’m sure there are those who will love this rendition of Oz, and I don’t begrudge you your right to appreciate the film. I feel as though my favorite old friends have been replaced by a cast of pretenders.



  1. everyman says:

    I saw the beginning of the movie before walking out.
    It was really bad. It is a movie for adults who have not grown up yet.
    I felt insulted. I am not that dumb. I know..what was I doing there in the first place…I wanted to see something, and that seemed to be the best thing playing.

    (0) 4 Total Votes - 2 up - 2 down
    • r0y says:

      Yeah, there is definitely a dearth of decent films around this time. Oddly enough, it’s when Easter (gasp, I mentioned a Christian word!) break is, so students of all ages are out of school/classes. One would think that, much like Thanksgiving and Christmas (gasp, there I go again), there are some decent hollywood movies (then again, decent and hollywood is an oxymoron).

      Sometimes I am an ox AND a moron.

      (0) 2 Total Votes - 1 up - 1 down
  2. r0y says:

    It would be nicer to see a version closer to the original story, which was allegory and metaphor about monetary supply and the concern about being taken off a gold and silver standard (the Federal Reserve did not exist at the time, but there was a constant push for the US to move towards centralized banking even prior to our Civil War).

    Anyway, a quick wiki-version can be found HERE – but I am not surprised Hollywood mangled this yet again.

    Also an interesting aside is the whole Public Domain law for this… funny how things are PD after 70 years (?) for most people, but not for rich, powerful entertainment/media companies. Go figure.

    (1) 3 Total Votes - 2 up - 1 down

Comments are closed.