A crooked road to Arroyo Grande?

October 21, 2014
Mayor Tony Ferrara

Mayor Tony Ferrara

Editor’s note: The Arroyo Grande ordinance limiting how the mayor and city council members may legally interact with city staff is at the bottom of this story.


Business owners and city staffers in Arroyo Grande have come out with accusations of graft and corruption by Mayor Tony Ferrara and other city and county officials.

The charges leveled against Ferrara and others include theft of public resources by public officials, threats and harm to political opponents using city resources, attempts to get kickbacks from contractors and misspending city money to support a favored developer.

Ferrara also is the newly-elected president of the League of California Cities. He did not respond to detailed questions from CalCoastNews.

As a member of the Arroyo Grande City Council, Ferrara is permitted by state and city laws to work with the council to set policy — and then may instruct only the city manager to carry out the council’s orders. Mayors and council members are prohibited by law from acting alone in giving orders to the city manager, or from instructing other city employees to do their bidding.

But several developers, business owners and Arroyo Grande employees accuse Ferrara of ordering staff to do work for him using city equipment. California law makes the personal use of equipment and city staff for personal use a crime, theft of public services.

On Sept. 27, Ferrara had three public works employees, two city trucks and one city backhoe at his home to remove a pear tree that had fallen over. The team cut up the tree and took the wood to the city corporate yard for disposal. A week earlier, Ferrara had another public works employee at his home moving a television set from his living room to his garage, employees said.

Tony Ferrara's fallen pear tree.

Tony Ferrara’s fallen pear tree.

Shortly after CalCoastNews began asking about the use of public services for his private home, the city issued a bill to Ferrara asking for $196 for the tree removal. The bill came on Oct. 6 and Ferrara paid the bill on Oct. 10.

Three days later Ferrara told the city council that he had been charged a hefty fee for the removal of the tree. But a half dozen local tree specialists gave estimates all starting at a higher rate than the mayor paid the city.

City Clerk Kelly Wetmore explained why the city had staff work on private property saying that because a portion of the tree was on the sidewalk, the city was responsible for its removal.

However, Commander Kevin McBride, a 30-year veteran on the Arroyo Grande Police Department, said that in some cases city employees will remove a limb dangerously obstructing the sidewalk. But city staff does not chop up and remove entire trees for homeowners, he said.

Last week, CalCoastNews contacted public works staff at five local cities. Each of the staff said that, in their city, removal of a tree was the homeowner’s responsibility. However, if a dangerous situation has been created and the homeowner is not able to remove a sidewalk obstruction, those cities will remove limbs covering the sidewalk, and require the homeowner to remove the remainder of the tree.

In addition to allegations of theft of public services, business owners accuse city officials of using threats of withholding contracts in order to promote their political opponents and squelch critics.

Several mayoral elections ago, one of Ferrara’s critics had SLOCO Data and Printing print and mail out pamphlets that painted a negative picture of Ferrara.

Julie Tizzano, the owner of the Arroyo Grande business, said she was approached by Councilman Jim Dickens and told that if she did not mail out a correction, she would no longer do business with the city. She refused Dickens’ demand.

“They threatened me for political gain,” Tizzano said. “Aside from several small jobs that only I have data for, I never received another job from the city.”

Other business owners contend Ferrara works with the city manager, city attorney, and community development director in a convoluted, dysfunctional fashion that has cost those owners millions of dollars. Most said their biggest problem has been receiving specific directions from staff, complying with those directions, and then having city officials or other staffers change the direction delaying the project adding to costs for the developer.

Many say they will not work in the city of Arroyo Grande as long as Adams and Ferrara are in charge.

About 10 years ago, former Community Development Director Rob Strong promoted several changes to the city’s general plan to alter land use policies. Several months later, he entered into a short-term escrow on a property that included a large parcel of land and two older homes, known as the Cherry Creek property. Strong did not have the money to purchase the property, according to a disclosure that he made.

Strong then contacted San Luis Obispo businessman Cliff Branch and recommended Branch develop the Cherry Creek property with a neighboring property owner, Branch told CalCoastNews in an email. The development required Branch to carry on a dialogue with Ferrara, Adams and City Attorney Tim Carmel, he wrote.

“Over the course of a year, we communicated extensively about the project,” Branch said in an email. “As the months passed, I realized I had landed in the twilight zone of the city government, where I felt continually misled, misinformed and/or intimidated.”

During the period, Ferrara sought a meeting, Branch wrote.

“At one point, Mayor Ferrara asked to ‘meet privately,’ and the two of us sat alone in the council chamber,” Branch wrote. “The mayor proceeded to give me a stern lecture on how to conduct myself during ‘his council meetings’ and strongly implied that it would be inadvisable to ignore his advice.

Strong later asked Branch to provide him with a purchase agreement for a lot with one of the existing homes on the Cherry Creek property at a favorable rate. He told Branch that he supervised the Arroyo Grande staffer who would be the city planner on the project. City planners can either expedite permits and other requirements or delay and possible destroy projects.

“It had always been a questionable situation because the city planning director had negotiated an option to purchase an existing house in the development, at a set price, which was highly unusual,” Branch said.

The city took no action, Branch said.

“The planning director warranted that he had made all proper disclosures to city officials. Ferrara had later said that it was ‘not an issue’ because a disclosure form was filed and approved by the city attorney,” Branch told CalCoastNews.

About seven years ago, while the project was still in the approval process, Strong left the city and the developers began working with Adams and Teresa McClish, the city’s new planning director.

“It was my impression that Adams simply ‘took orders’ from Ferrara, so a bad situation became even more dysfunctional,” Branch wrote. “It was also my experience that that City Attorney Tim Carmel conducted the city’s legal affairs with remarkable arrogance. Mr. Carmel once stormed out of a meeting called by the city in a truculent fashion while other city staff members remained at the table, stunned by the city attorney’s behavior.”

In the end, San Luis Obispo County Supervisor Caren Ray, a former Arroyo Grande city official who was involved in the projects approvals, purchased the home that Strong had optioned. By that time, the home had undergone extensive remodeling.

Then, on March 4, 14 days before the closing of Ray’s home, the Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, which includes Ray’s live-in boyfriend Randy Russom, noted an administrative decision in the meeting minutes to designate the recently purchased home as historical.

Because of the Mills Act, this decision will lower Ray’s property taxes by as much as 90 percent as compensation for limiting future remodeling and construction work on the home.

Several years ago, Rick Loughead, another prolific developer and the owner of Dolphin Bay in Shell Beach, was working on a project in the village area of Arroyo Grande. However, because of issues with misdirection from city officials and staff which stalled project approvals, Loughhead said he sold the project at a loss and that he will no longer work with the city.

“It was a difficult and convoluted deal with Ferrara, Adams, and the planning director,” Loughead said. “I couldn’t work with them and I sold the property.”

In 2004, when John and Beatrice Spencer agreed to convert a vacant building in Arroyo Grande into a Spencer’s Fresh Market, they did so at a cost of several million dollars with assurance from the city that the Courtland Place parcel across the street would include courtyards and small size shops and not a large supermarket, John Spencer said. However, several years later, developer Nick Tompkins began negotiating a deal to place a large discount grocery across the street with the city manager’s support — prompting the Spencers to close their Arroyo Grande store.

In 2011, Doug DeBerti approached city planners to get pre-approval for his plan to put a surf shop in the former home of J.J.’s Market. After receiving assurance from McClish that the project would sail through quickly, he purchased the building from Tompkins.

ag mura 3

The mural the city denied and then approved.

Then city officials asked DeBerti to share his parking lot with Tompkins and he declined.

“After that things went south,” DeBerti said.

Nine months later, city officials rejected DeBerti’s proposal because of issues they had with the driveway, as well as a mural he wanted to place on the side of the building. In the end, the building went back into Tompkins’ name. City officials then approved Tompkins’ request for the same mural and driveway that DeBerti had proposed.

“If this isn’t corruption, I don’t know what is,” DeBerti said.

City Manager Steve Adams and Teresa McClish

City Manager Steve Adams and Teresa McClish

In addition to complaints of the financial and emotional cost of attempting to deal with the city, residents question the cost to taxpayers for sweetheart deals to favored developers.

In 2010, Arroyo Grande was dealing with a deficit. The city council was looking at cutting money from after-school programs and reducing the budget for police.

The council then voted to buy the former Farm Credit building from Tompkins to use as City Hall. The $2,020,000 purchase price was almost twice the market value for the building. The council paid about $1 million too much to Tompkins, local appraisers said.


Arroyo Grande Ordinance 2.08.080, administrative relationships:

The council and its members shall deal with the administrative service of the city only through the city manager, except for the purposes of inquiry, and neither the council, nor any member thereof, shall give orders to any officer or employee of the city under the supervision of the city manager. The city manager shall take his or her orders and instructions only from the council as a body, and no individual member of the council shall give any order or instruction to the city manager. Any subordinate officer or employee receiving orders or instructions contrary to the provisions of this section shall report the same in writing immediately thereafter to the city manager, and the city manager shall promptly forward a copy or summary of such report to each member of the council. He or she shall likewise promptly advise each member of the council of any order or instruction received by him or her contrary to the provisions of this section. It is not intended by the provisions of this section to restrict unduly the privileges of a member of the council to request the city manager, but not any other officer or employee under his or her supervision, to prepare a report dealing with any matter of city business, or municipal affairs generally, if such report can be compiled without the undue dislocation of city activities and without the expenditure of considerable quantities of time by city personnel.


Don’t miss links to CalCoastNews investigations, like us on Facebook.


….and this is why we have a Write-In candidate for Mayor….



Be a part of the change Arroyo Grande desperately needs and deserves.


I think the developers, business community and citizens that are coming forward are the hero’s for this story. This is a community that has guts and obviously is still focus by a moral compass.

Congratulations to all of you honesty, hardworking, devoted members of our community for taking back our town. You have set an example for other communities if they have the will to fight they too can reform their corrupt communities.

Hail America!


The Jim Hill Campaign is painting the town yellow!

Thank you to the citizens also who are brave to speak up against the establishment and WORK for CHANGE.

Arroyo Grande DOES NOT have to do BUSINESS this way.

Why the hell is the MAYOR in CHARGE of EVERYTHING?

Sure makes the Council look bad…..


Good grief. At this rate how long would it have been until Ferrara ordered one or more of his critics to be “clipped”?


This is just the beginning.

Ask people who have done business here for years.

Ask your neighbors their opinion of the MAYOR and City Hall

I think you will find arrogance at every corner.

BTW What was that price that Rob Strong was to purchase the Vanderveer property for?




That sounds like maybe it would maybe buy you some dirt…without a house on it.


This morning, when driving down Main Street in AG, I saw so many home-made signs saying “Jim Hill write-in mayor” (or to that effect). I have never seen so much determination from businesses and citizens alike to get rid of a sitting mayor.

Yes, I was jealous. I’ll probably be stuck with Jan Marx until I leave SLO.

Kudos, people of AG. Kudos. May the rest of the cities take note on what you’re trying to do; on your awakening.


Main Street = Grand Ave., of course. Wanted to say “the main streets” (got off on Halcyon, then right at Grand, then all the way to Grover).


All that is bloomin’ in Arroyo Grande right now is Jim Hill for Mayor signs in bright yellow!


You’re done, Ferrara…


You are right.

We need protections for the employees who are willing to be whistleblowers.

They all knew about the affair and they are all afraid of Ferraro.


Hopefully Dan Dow will take a hard look at this and do something. Otherwise, Otis and Julie are going to have to activate their appeal to the Grand Jury.

Has anyone contacted the FBI yet?

Might be time to.

This is going to get uglier before it gets better.



The signs have got to be unnerving. THEY are EVERYWHERE!

I heard that even Mr Tompkins said yes to his 12 hour sign yesterday wanting to butter both sides of his bread . The KING decreed and cried and the Campaign was summoned to remove the HILL sign.

Oh wow!

Mike Byrd

As the person who spoke with Mr. Tompkins about placing the sign and then removing it, I can tell you that the mayor’s fingers were not in this one. Maybe if it had stayed up longer they would have been but this is one he wasn’t involved in. Sounds like he may have been too busy with everything else of greater import.


Tompkins is in bed with Tony, has been for a long time …Im sure it did not take long for King Tony or his cronies to find out he had a sign!!!.. Politics makes for strange bed fellows!


Mike, when you try to defend the Mayor, no one believes you.


Holy —-.

Why are we discussing the election when we should be discussing jail?


…because arresting public employees for illegal activities would establish a terrible precedent that would, no doubt, leave our city halls mostly vacant.


It would leave the halls of nearly ALL government buildings empty.


Because it takes years to get a case against even the most flagrantly corrupt city officials.

Remember the City of Bell?

We cannot leave Tony Ferrara as mayor, especially if we also have an investigation of AG’s corruption on-going because Ferrara and his city manager will have too much influence on how it is conducted.


Anyone care to wager how Sandra Duerr and the Fibune will try to spin this one.

Maybe they will use the words “uncomfortable situation” again.

The Fibune is a big reason why corruption flourishes here … If it’s one of their cronies they sweep the sh*t under the rug


They may decide not to spin at all, and choose to ignore the story. Is Tony going to give them a quote saying all these people are making this up, and there’s not a smidgen of truth to any of it?

What are they gonna say, that the folks who came forward are lying, that there’s no truth to anything these people said happened to them?

Why, that would be like the AG mayor and City Council saying that the police officers who went to city on on 7/3 don’t know what they saw, and aren’t telling the truth!

Oh wait, that did happen…

Mike Byrd

I have no idea what went on with a prior attempt at a mural but I’m not understanding who or how the city could have denied it. When I was at the city council meeting in support of the mural project which was recently completed I believe I heard the city attorney tell an unimpressed council that they could only make comments, that they could not deny or require changes. If I understood him correctly, the public arts commission has sole responsibility for public art projects. At least that was my understanding.

This particular project, like the subsequent one on Courtland, is a wonderful asset to our city and irrespective of our views about the current mayor, I think we can all agree on that.


did Nick donate the money for the mural that ended up on his building?


Probably came out of the Art / Cultural Fund.

Mike Byrd

Yes, he paid for the entire project, something like $30,000 I believe. There aren’t many who could or would make that kind of contribution but I, for one, am appreciative that he did.


He could afford to pay $30,000 when he got an extra $1,000,000+ for his property from the city.


id take a million dollar kickback and gladly give out $30k to charity…..


A million bucks would buy a lot of very nice murals!


Doug DeBerti was willing to pay that much, and so maybe you should be appreciative to Doug and his designer for coming up with the mural you see today


It is really beautiful!




The design for that mural was the designer Doug DeBerti had working for him as he tried to open a surf shop. The man who designed that mural is the man who did the tree on the side of Branch St Deli, it is a shame he is not getting credit for HIS great mural. The mural the city denied to Doug to have painted and Doug was willing to pay for.

So Nick and public arts get credit for something they stole from Doug DeBerti, and his designer, I know this for a fact, because I know Doug. He is an outstanding individual who has integrity and morals, in fact that goes for his whole family.

The city denied it, because they did not feel it would add to the city.