SLO backs chief over violations of city’s travel claims policy

February 16, 2015
Steve Gesell

Steve Gesell


In response to a CalCoastNews exclusive on multiple violations of city travel reimbursement policies by San Luis Obispo Police Chief Steve Gesell, the city manager and finance director worked out a way to explain the chief’s “mistakes.”

Even though Gesell’s actions violate written city policies, Director of Finance Wayne Padilla dismissed many violations as “consistent application” of policy according to a “historical interpretation.” Historical interpretation means a policy is adhered to not by what is written, but by how the policy has been followed in the past.

In one email, Gesell says he is very satisfied with the “verbiage” used by Padilla to explain his requests for reimbursement.

“The comprehensive review of Chief Gessell’s travel records has been completed and indicates that there was consistent application by the police department of travel policy interpretation that have been used on a historical basis,” Padilla says in an email to the Tribune.

City policy requires that employees keep detailed receipts and do not spend more than $10 for breakfast, $15 for lunch and $35 for dinner.

During the past year, Gesell often failed to keep itemized receipts while violating the city’s per-diem meal rates. During a July 30 through Aug. 1 conference Lichtig and Gesell attended together in Sacramento, the pair violated the per-diem meal expense allowance in all but one of the four meals they shared.

In addition, Gesell often selected the highest priced lodging available even though city policy says, “The accommodations you use should be economical but practical.” Again, Padilla found no wrongdoing under the “historical interpretation.”

In September, the city agreed to reimburse Gesell for the cost of attending the International Association of Chiefs of Police Conference in Orlando the following month. Gesell then purchased three airline tickets for $1,181 for himself, his wife and his daughter.

Even though the airline invoice shows a per ticket price of $288.40, Gesell had the city reimburse $893.20, the highest price for a one ticket from U.S. Airways. The city approved this under Padilla’s historical interpretation basis.

San Luis Obispo attorney Stew Jenkins said it appeared the city manager, police chief and city prosecutor haven’t read the Jan. 29, opinion of the 4th District Court of Appeal, handed down in Woody’s Group, Inc. v. City of Newport Beach.

The court held: “the city’s incantation of a “policy and practice” in direct violation of its own code cannot conform that alleged policy and practice to due process. The city council violated the rules laid down in the city’s own municipal code, then purported to exempt itself from that code by invoking some previously undocumented custom of ignoring those rules when it comes to council members themselves.”

In its ruling, the court said that there is no room for unwritten rules, policies or customs outside the municipal code to allow city officials to give themselves privileges.

“It would seem even more obvious that a police chief (or any other managerial officer) could not be insulated by a custom of overlooking prior violations from culpability for filing claims for reimbursement “in direct violation of” a code or policy adopted years ago by the city council to prevent misappropriation of public funds for personal use.

City policy does not permit Gesell to charge the city for meals for his family or while on a vacation. Even so, Gesell also got the city to pay for several meals for his family including a $39 for an Oct. 26 lunch at Mei Asian Chinese Buffet in Orlando. The lunch buffet at Mei Asian Chinese Buffet costs $8.50 per adult. On Oct. 29, the day after the convention ended, Gesell and his family drove to the Everglades, a three-hour drive from Orlando. In the evening, Gesell purchased two meals at Quinn’s on the Beach for $58.83, and then billed taxpayers, city records show.

Padilla acknowledged that Gesell did charge the city for several meals for his family. He brushed off the issue saying that Gesell “inadvertently and mistakenly submitted two requests for reimbursement.”

Gesell agreed to reimburse the city $146.43 for a portion of the family’s meals that were charged to the city. Padilla offset the meal reimbursement charge by crediting Gesell for the cost of a rental car. Gesell did not rent a car on a different trip and Padilla allowed him to use that credit for the Orlando trip. City policy says a rental car is only permitted when required and recommends employees take buses, streetcars and subways when available.

“Each employee is responsible for following these practices,” city policy says. “Violation of this policy may result in disciplinary action, termination of employment or criminal prosecution.”

Katie Lichtig

Katie Lichtig

In response to the CalCoastNews exclusive, Padilla and Lichtig are recommending three changes to the city’s travel policy – a requirement for each employee to sign his own travel reimbursement reports, having the city manager approve expense reports for department heads, and having Lichtig and City Attorney Christine Dietrick approve each other’s reimbursement requests.

In September, Gesell spent a week in Israel learning how its police agencies deal with suicide bombers and attacks by militants armed with automatic weapons. The program, sponsored by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), provides American police officials with training in Israeli police tactics that includes having police wear body armor and carry automatic weapons as they patrol the streets.

While the trip was to be paid for entirely by the ADL, Gesell had one of his sergeants purchase a plane ticket on Aug. 20 for a flight from San Luis Obispo to Los Angeles International Airport, where Gesell was pre-ticketed for the flight to Israel.

The chief then submitted a written request to have the city pay the $379 charge out of the police department’s training account which he was later paid.

Gesell has made multiple claims that no public moneys were used to fund the trip. After being questioned about the $379 charge, Gesell refunded the city for the expense.

Mike Brennler, a decorated former San Luis Obispo police officer criticized Gesell for his travel and reimbursement practices.

“Gesell’s behavior is deplorable, if not criminal,” Brennler said. “It brings great discredit to the police department and serves to erode the public’s confidence. It also serves as a model of hypocrisy to the line level employees who are expected to behave honestly and responsibly. Undoubtedly, these employees have been suffering when faced with the reality that their leader has set the bar of acceptable and ethical behavior so terribly low.”

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Historical interpretation. Well that’s the easy way out. Just do as you like and everything is ok until you get caught. Look what happened in Atascadero with the accumulated overtime sick leave issue that McKinney declared that’s how we have done it. Pretty nice, he left town with a $140,000+ check. Most of these abusive actions are done by the people at the top because there is no body watching them so why not put your hand in the cookie jar and get fat.

Wouldn’t it be nice if all of us could use “historical interpretation, when we are confronted by the government and fined or taxed for what we do.

It’s time for the citizens of this county to demand accountability before they bankrupt us.

Attention SLO city council, Here is how a CA city handled it’s police chief….

“A small Northern California town has fired its police chief over his handling of an investigation”

and this was just for handling a investigation wrong not for stealing taxpayer money like Chief Gesell did.

Take an hint.

These are grounds for firing ALL of them – Lichtig, Padilla and Gisell. They know better and at their outrageous salaries, they can certainly afford to pay for their families’ vacations. They should be ashamed of themselves. These are the best and brightest we can get here? But they can’t fill out an expense report? And they want to send city goons into your rental property to look for violations? And they want to participate in a “poop patrol” to stop doggie-doo littering? And be sure to cite people for visible trash cans, too.

It’s time to take out the trash all right – starting at city hall.

Unless a howling mob with flaming torches and pitchforks shows up at next city council meeting all the yammering and bitching about it does nothing to stop it.

“Even though Gesell’s actions violate written city policies, Director of Finance Wayne Padilla dismissed many violations as “consistent application” of policy according to a “historical interpretation.””

So basically, historically everyone has stolen from the SLO taxpayers so even though the chief was caught “this time” (many times he and many other city employees were not caught) we are not going to do anything about it.

In other words we got our tax increase city taxpayers so go stuff it.

I said it before and I’ll say it again. The city is flush with cash. Measure Y and Measure G were just money grabs and the citizenry bought into it. After eight years we had nothing to show for it and in another eight years it will be the same. The more money you give local government, the more it wastes.

Please remember this in eight years when the city comes back crying for more money. It went into public safety all right, all the way to Florida.

Little wonder no one respects law enforcement any more.

The disrespect of many for law enforcement has rather different origins. This is more in the line of the disrespect many people share for politicians and high-level bureaucrats.

Well, shit, EVERYONE is driving 45 down Santa Rosa, even though the “written law” is 25 (or 35)… so I’ll just tell the next WANKER who’s writing me up for 45 in a 35 to eat a big one, I’m just following the established interpretation of the posted limit.

Sweet! Thanks Chief! Can’t wait to apply this twisted logic to all kinds of Government-mandated crap.

Dumbasses. Truly. Just no other way to sugar coat the ineptitude of the people in local government.

If one of the line level officers did something like the so called leader they would be on ad min leave W/O pay , and more than likely lose their job , he and the so called city manager are like two peas in a pod , they COVER for each other , the FBI would have a ball in the dept with all the stuff that has and does go on there

Come on now admit it, if a line officers did this and was put on admin leave it would be “with pay” for likely 6 months or more while there was an internal investigation. Then they would be allowed to retire or if fired they would sue and either take a settlement (of taxpayer money, not from the departments budget) or get their job back, thanks to the police union. Didn’t SLO had officers bring drugs in from Mexico and extort from informants and they made money from their “leave”.


The sad part is, nothing will change unless the town hounds and THREATENS the complacent city council. Threaten them with recall or defeat next election; nothing less will do.

Adam Hill signaled the arrogance of power well when he said (paraphrase) accusations were “..from fringe people reading fringe media..”

The arrogance is clear and complete. Your TOP COP abuses power and tax money. Posting here on this board changes nothing. Clicking thumbs up changes nothing.

The ball is in the public court. I’ll bet nothing will be done, no more than the zero that is done regarding a special focus of my family, the unmuffled vehicle issue. No service. No Pride. No integrity. No Service.

We are all sheep letting the heavily paid, heavily pensioned do as they will.

Phone/visit/hound your councilperson for Lichtig’s employment scalp (start with the commuter lady) , or just bend over and keep taking it, people.