Deputy’s DUI arrest leads to allegations of favoritism

November 16, 2016

Jim Fellows while employed by the SLO Police Department.

UPDATE: Sheriff’s spokesman Tony Cipolla said deputy Jim Fellows is facing a temporary suspension from the department following his trial. The department also detailed its reasons for retaining an officer arrested while on probation.

By KAREN VELIE

A San Luis Obispo Sheriff deputy was arrested after he was caught driving over 100 mph while intoxicated. Nevertheless, he was not booked into the county jail, no mug shot was taken and even though he was working under the county’s new hire probationary period, he kept his job.

On Oct. 8 shortly before midnight, CHP officer Preston Richwine clocked “a loud muscle car” going 102 mph on Los Osos Valley Road. Richwine then made a U-turn and pulled over the blue 1965 Ford Mustang.

When Richwine walked up to the window, Jim Fellows handed the CHP officer his license and San Luis Obispo County Deputy Sheriff ID card, according to the incident report. Richwine then asked Fellows to get out of his car and proceeded to remove the revolver Fellows was wearing on his side.

“The subject then began to relentlessly apologize for the speeding and related that he was just a ‘car guy’ taking his passenger on a ride and showing off,” according to the incident report.

After noticing the smell of alcohol, Richwine asked Fellows if he had been drinking. But Fellows evaded the officer’s questions and attempted to change the subject.

“He then became very frustrated and continued to relentlessly apologies for the speeding,” according to the incident report. “He was also evasive and would only answer my questions with an apology or repeat the fact he was only showing his passenger what the car could do.”

After the interview went into a more “cooperative direction,” Richwine asked Fellows to take a breathalyzer test. Fellows blew a .15 on the PAS test, almost double the .08 threshold for driving while intoxicated.

Generally, drivers who have a blood alcohol of .15 or higher are booked into the county jail, but Fellows was cited for driving under the influence and released to a friend to take him home. In some cases where the CHP is dealing with multiple calls, such as a Saturday night, officers will cite and release because of logistic concerns, said Lt. Mike Brown.

“Everyone is held accountable and it doesn’t matter if you are law enforcement or not,” Brown said. “The officer who made the arrest had not met this gentleman before.”

Before going to work for the sheriff’s department about eight weeks ago, Fellows had worked as a San Luis Obispo police officer as part of the Community Action Team.

New hires at the sheriff’s department are required to serve a 12 months probationary period in which the sheriff’s department determines if the new hire meets the department’s standards.

In most cases, getting arrested for a DUI during the probationary period will result in termination. However, Fellows spent several weeks on paid administrative leave while internal affairs conducted an investigation, sheriff spokesman Tony Cipolla said. He was then released back to work.

Cipolla said after his DUI case makes its way through the court system, Fellows faces further suspension as part of the disciplinary process. As for why Fellows retained his job even though he was on probation, Cipolla said each improper conduct incident is looked at “on a case by case basis.”

“Deputy Fellows was in fact employed for a short time, however had been an employee for more than 20 years in law enforcement, without prior such conduct, no disciplinary actions taken against him and an exemplary record,” Cipolla wrote in an email. “Based on the circumstances, he has been suspended for 30 days without pay and placed on a last chance agreement, which essentially extends his probation for three years.”

In California, an enhancement is required to be added to a DUI offense if it is demonstrated that the defendant was driving recklessly on the roadway at more than 20 mph over the speed limit. Richwine clocked Fellows driving 47 mph over the posted speed limit. It will be up to the court to determine if Fellows was driving recklessly.

Fellows is slated to be arraigned on Nov. 22 at the San Luis Obispo County courthouse.


Loading...
81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Once again, officers are above the law that applies to the rest of us. I want to see the CHP name one, just one ordinary citizen, who got caught driving drunk over 100 mph that didn’t go to jail. Also, what is the name of the officer that made the decision to release him. Total bs.


Put in charge of being the pilot of your boat to nowhere Sheriff Ian. That should be a good punishment.


Intoxicated while carrying a gun and driving? He should have been arrested and later canned.


What a load of bull manure!


Ladies & Gentlemen,


San Luis Obispo County Sheriff Ian Parkinson has some explaining to do.


Sheriff Parkinson projects himself as a straight shooter, but this situation involving his employee cast doubt on his ability to lead the department. As taxpaying citizens, we deserve better than having the power elite protect their people, and we all know that an ordinary citizen would NEVER have been OR released after blowing a .15-twice the legal limit.


Out law enforcement officers deserve respect, BUT it is also important to weed out the bad apples and we should be able to expect that LEO’s live UP to a higher standard, not a lower one.


To quote the story, “Sheriff Ian Parkinson was out of the office and unable to respond to questions today, said sheriff’s department spokesman Tony Cupola.”


Tony? Ian? We deserve answers, not ducking a story.


Just saying,


Josey


From the look of the picture of Fellows, If Parkinson does do any real leadership here and hold the officer responsible, what I see happening is a quick retirement for Fellows, at full or higher salary.


I doubt Fellows or Richwine would do the same for the average person. Sorry Fellows you must go as you did not hold up the values of a peace officer. Don’t know if Richwine had to go to another call or not but why couldn’t he call for another peace officer to take Fellows in. You see multiple police units all the time on a vehicle stop.


Parkinson is all about cronyism and taking care of his buddies. What’s terrible about this situation is that about a month ago the deputies told me a probationary Deputy named Souza was released from probation after the in car video tape was reviewed where he uttered an expletive in reference to the field sergeant. The tape ended up in the hands of the defense team as part of the discovery motion and when the sheriff learned of this the deputy was let go. Which is worse a drunk driving probationary deputy sheriff who might kill somebody or a probationary deputy sheriff who accidentally gets caught saying what he actually thinks about a sergeant. I have talked to a number of deputies who have said they are through with Parkinson and they are ready for him to retire at the end of this term so they can get somebody new as Sheriff.

Now we see why..


Fellows was cited for driving under the influence and released. In some cases where the CHP is dealing with multiple calls, such as a Saturday night, officers will cite and release because of logistic concerns, said Lt. Mike Brown.

——————

Bull effin shingles. No citizen blows a .15 and is given a ticket and allowed to keep driving. That would be gross negligence by a cop. .15 is so dangerous, it’s unreal. CHP are smarter than that.


The article implies that happened but doesn’t actually say that happened so I don’t believe the guy was cited and released–at least to drive. There must be more to the story.


If he was sighted and released to drive after blowing a .15, the CHP officer just cost himself his job too.


Perhaps the passenger was sober and drove away.


They don’t release them to drive. they have to be picked up by a sober, licensed driver…


They don’t release them to drive. they have to be picked up by a sober, licensed driver

—————-

Thank goodness! I mean I know that would be the case in a normal situation it just didn’t say it in this article. I’m not seeing much of a difference between being cited or being driven to the police station and booked. Same end game.


Now, how this guy kept his job makes no sense. Anyone dumb enough to do 100mph while a .15 is not fit to have a driver’s license let alone to be a police officer.


Very poor decision making.


Wow. I’m not even surprised.


If this guy keeps his job, that nurse stealing meds at the jail should have NO problem keeping hers. I mean, she has been a SLO County employee for YEARS. This dude isn’t even off probation.


These are the people that get raises every year when other employees don’t get raises. Yay.


Citizens will be outraged, sheriff will be interrogated, nothing will change.


Just speaking the truth.