Morro Bay police chief tussles with YouTuber

February 9, 2018

During a dispute on Tuesday between Morro Bay police and a YouTuber who films officers, Police Chief Greg Allen and another officer physically took the cameraman to the ground after he refused to provide identification, video shows. Footage of the incident, as well as follow-up videos involving verbal tussles between YouTubers and Morro Bay police, have received thousands of views this week. [Cal Coast Times]

YouTuber “Nasty Nathanial” alleges Allen and the other officer violently threw him to the ground. The cameraman was then handcuffed and placed in a police car for about an hour before being let go without any charges, he said.

“I was not just detained. I was physically assaulted by the chief of police, Gregory Allen. I was thrown to the ground and, yeah. I was in a lot of pain. They put me in a police car for an hour or more in handcuffs that were on very tight,” Nasty Nathanial said in YouTube video. “I’ve never had an incident quite as extreme as this where I was physically assaulted by anyone, let alone members of law enforcement.”

The Morro Bay Police Department has since released a statement saying the videographer was detained for the purpose of determining he was not a threat to police or the community and “to verify his actions were not terrorist-related.”

Nasty Nathanial is a self-described “First Amendment Auditor,” who in recent months, has filmed numerous police and government employees in Southern California and on the Central Coast.

According to Morro Bay police, at about 10:45 a.m. Tuesday, Nasty Nathanial was recording video footage while standing at the entrance to the police department parking lot dressed in all black military-style clothing with tucked in military boots. At that point, Allen was entering the parking lot, and he stopped to ask Nasty Nathanial what he was doing. Nasty Nathanial said he was filming police vehicles entering and exiting the lot, according to the police department.

Allen then learned from other officers that, moments prior, Nasty Nathanial had been recording video in the police department lobby. Shortly later, Allen and the other officer approached Nasty Nathanial, who had move to outside the front entrance to the police station.

Video shows the other officer stating Nasty Nathanial had committed a misdemeanor and violated the penal code while filming inside the police lobby. Meanwhile, Allen said his main concern was that Nasty Nathanial had been filming the back of the police station and that created officer safety concerns. Allen also said that in a lot of towns people do not have the best intentions for officers.

After both officers demanded Nasty Nathanial’s identification and the videographer did not comply, Allen lunged toward the camera and Nasty Nathanial then went to the ground, video shows.

“Chief Allen had an immediate concern for the safety of police employees based on his personal knowledge of past attacks of police stations,” the police department said in its statement. “An investigation into his identity and actions revealed he posed no public safety threat, and he was a self-proclaimed photo journalist and “First Amendment Auditor.” He was then no longer detained. The entire incident during Chief Allen’s participation in the detention occurred over a 45-60-minute period.”

The following day, Nasty Nathanial was joined in Morro Bay by fellow YouTuber “johnny five o.” The two videographers filmed additional footage of the police department.

In a YouTube video of his own, johnny five o claimed that, while detaining Nasty Nathanial, Morro Bay police called the SLO County District Attorney’s Office, which instructed them to let the videographer go because no crime had occurred.

Another video shows johnny five o calling the police department and speaking with Allen. The police chief hangs up after johnny five o briefly questions him about the incident and refuses to provide any identification other than “good citizen.”

Johnny five o then called back and said to Allen, “Listen bitch, you work for me. You don’t need to know who I am.”

The YouTuber warned Allen and the police department that they would receive 1,000 calls in protest of the incident with Nasty Nathanial. At least one other YouTuber followed suit and called the police department.







Loading...

38
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
1waterluvr

Nasty needs to get a real job. Just a lazy YouTube hit seeker stirring the pot

sweethome

Sorry Niles, but you are absolutely wrong. I suggest you read up on the law before you make your statements.

sweethome

To Myself You have to obey if and only if it is a LEGAL order. The cops must have probable cause to detain someone. The CANNOT stop or detain WITHOUT probable cause. For example in San Luis
Obispo and other cities,
Police will often to pull someone over and/or detain them simply because someone is black. Just like in Phoenix Az. when cops pull someone over because they have skin. That is illegal. What “Nasty” did is legal. In a public area, anyone can film. The
Supreme Court has upheld that. What he was wearing was completely irrelevant.

Myself

Unless I miss my guess when a police officer asks for identification you need to produce it, this hack is dressed in black with pants tucked into his boots,he is lucky he didn’t get tased,or shot. First amendment auditor HA, just a trouble maker looking to make noise, he’s just like that hack in a wheelchair we had around here a couple years ago suing for the sake of it.

cosmos7

You are 100% incorrect. California has no ‘stop and identify’ laws, so unless you are behind the wheel of a motor vehicle there is no requirement to produce identification. This is not Nazi Germany, and police cannot just ask to see your papers. Police can prompt for identification if they have reason to believe a crime has been committed and can detain a person while they establish or verify such identity, but they must articulate what crime they believe has been committed. This YouTuber may be an ass, but it is certainly not illegal to video anything while standing on public property.

Myself

So if i was to stand in front of your house dressed in swat looking outfit with a video camara filming comings and goings in your drive way you would be allright with that?

cosmos7

Whether I am alright with it or not is irrelevant. The fact remains that it is 100% legal as long as you are on public property.

Xarai

ever heard of tourism? if its illegal to photograph or video in public how come tourism is a major industry?
btw XD ppl stand outside of the whitehouse everyday and take pictures pretty sure someone lives there

sweethome

jarhead. You are talking about apples and oranges. Nasty legally filmed (actually video) in a
public place. If some stranger was filming on YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY, then I would agree with you in that case. You would be within your rights. When cops become Bullies with Badges and are ignorant and
violate people’s rights and become violent, then that is terrorism in my book. I’ve it happen enough in SLO already.

mkaney

Whatever you may think of “Nasty Nathaniel” it is the police that suckered themselves in his game. A professional police officer ought to know that objective reality and statistics do not, in fact, indicated any increased threat to police officers. Isolated incidents do not change this, and such incidents are not new. A professional also ought to know that it is NOT a crime to film in a public area on public property.

Unfortunately, facts are not what people use to form their opinions. Police supporters will dislike this comment, regardless of any valid information presented.

Robert1

tase him next time!

AmericaBeautiful

I commend Chief Allen for his courtesy and clarity. He explained what Nathanial did wrong and was thus perfectly in his rights to request ID.

mkaney

But there was no law broken so he did nothing wrong.

Xarai

explains why allan is NO LONGER AN OFFICER.
because he has no idea what the law is or how to NOT assault someone
justice is served