Social media misinformation prompts online bullying

April 6, 2018

Update: Jimmy Paulding responded shortly before the article was published to say that he had heard from CR Lara from Latino Outreach who wanted to reschedule the forum because of Supervisor Compton’s campaign. Paulding later posted on Facebook that the Latino Outreach Council is covering for Compton. The article has been updated to reflect Paulding’s comments.

After San Luis Obispo County District 4 supervisor candidate Jimmy Paulding accused his opponent on Facebook of backing out on a debate, several of his supporters began making fun of Lynn Compton’s looks and calling her names such as coward and troll. [Cal Coast Times]

“I’m sorry to have to announce that my opponent Lynn Compton has backed out of our scheduled debate next Friday so that she can attend “Cruz Night,” Paulding posted on his campaign Facebook page. “We have been trying to schedule debates for weeks, and now it is not clear when the community will ever get the opportunity to ask us both questions and have a fair chance to compare candidates. I will continue to try to get her to join me, because voters deserve to hear from their candidates.”

However, the tentative date of the debate was changed by the Latino Outreach Council and not Supervisor Lynn Compton. The council was planning to hold the debate on April 13, until the Cruz Night event was moved to the same night.

“I have been informed that the Nipomo Chamber has changed the date of the inaugural ‘Cruise Night’ in Nipomo to April 13 due to expected rain on April 6,” Jacqueline Frederick wrote in a message to Compton. “As a result, LOC has decided to move the candidate forum to another night to insure that the Nipomo residents can attend both major events. I apologize for the inconvenience. We will let you know of future available dates once we confirm the availability of the Nipomo High School Forum.”

Following Paulding’s Facebook posting, SLO Tribune contributor and campaign media buyer Tom Fulks shared Paulding’s post while calling Compton a troll and a coward.

On multiple Facebook pages, more than 50 people have chastised Compton based on Paulding’s accusation that she had backed out of the debate. County planner Brandi Cummings, who was under fire last year for failing to follow board direction in producing a draft marijuana ordinance, also called Compton a coward after reading Paulding’s post.

“…voters deserve to hear from their candidates,” Brandi Cummings writes under Paulding’s Facebook post. “Unfortunately, Lynn Compton does not have the best interests of her constituents or the community in mind. Lynn Compton pushes ideological rants and cherry picks facts to suit her situation. She talks fast and talks over people or cuts them off to sound authoritative and sure of her position. She cannot compete in a head-to-head debate with Jimmy Paulding because she will be going against facts, logic, and intellect. She will come out looking incompetent, uninformed, and just plain rude. Lynn Compton is a coward and in the end, it is the voters who lose. She is not only snubbing Jimmy Paulding but the election process and the constituents of this County.”

According to the county’s civil service rules, staffers can face discipline including dismissal for conduct unbecoming an employee, discourteous treatment of other employees or the public and improper political activity, according to rule 14.

After the board pulled the rogue marijuana ordinance in May 2017, Cummings began demeaning the board majority on social media. Shortly afterwards, Cummings was barred from speaking about planning department issues at board meetings.

According to Paulding, CR  Lara called him on April 3 to tell him that the forum had  to be “rescheduled” to accommodate Compton.

In response to the Cal Coast Times article, Paulding wrote on Facebook that the Latino Outreach Council is covering for Compton.

Paulding’s post on Facebook:

Hi Vita, the Cal Coast News article that you reference is full of lies. First and foremost, I responded to their request for comment at 2:10 PM today. Here’s my response: “CR Lara with the Latino Outreach Council called me on April 3rd to tell me that the debate confirmed for the 4/13 date was cancelled to accommodate a request by Lynn Compton’s campaign to reschedule the debate because the Nipomo Chamber was rescheduling their ‘Cruz Night’ event due to rain in the forecast. My Facebook post reflects this fact. Your version of events is different from what CR Lara originally told me over the phone.” And this statement reflects the truth. Here are the odd sequence of events. After I had received the call from CR Lara on the 3rd, and after my Facebook post, I received a text from Jackie Frederick on April 4th saying, “Jimmy, I have been informed that the Nipomo Chamber has changed the date of the inaugural ‘Cruise Night’ in Nipomo to April 13 due to expected rain on April 6. As a result, LOC has decided to move the candidate forum to another night to ensure that the Nipomo residents can attend both major events. I apologize for any inconvenience. We will let you know of future available dates once we confirm the availability of the Nipomo High School Forum. The person in charge is on vacation this week and not available to reschedule. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. I’ll reach out to you as soon as I know the dates the room is available. Thank you again. Kind regards, Jacqueline Frederick.” I responded to Jackie immediately with: “Thanks, Jackie. Just to let you know CR Lara previously communicated this message to me but with the added noted that the LOC rescheduled per Lynn’s request.” Jackie responded, “He never spoke to Lynn. Her assistant let us know about the change by the Chamber of the Cruz night and I decided it was best to change the date of your debate for the reason I have expressed. I apologize for the inconvenience but it’s better to have the debate when there isn’t this type of major conflict. Thanks Jimmy.” So, Vita, please ask me in the future if you question the truth of any message coming from my campaign. It is obvious that the story changed to cover for Lynn. And, as typical, it is the Cal Coast News Karen Velie who is doing her bidding, along with poor investigative reporting.”







Loading...

25 Comments

  1. Mariposa says:

    It’s been said, if you want to make conservatives mad, tell them a lie; if you want to make progressives/liberals mad, tell them the truth.

    (23) 43 Total Votes - 33 up - 10 down
  2. CountyCat says:

    LiveHere
    You are right, never thought about the young face, to the average voter means he is innocent and they needed that because all the progressives eventually show themselves. So it required a FRESH young face and they found it in Jimmy (that is why he is not JAMES) and they brought in the biggest guns in this county – Fulks and then moved Nick Andre down along with Adam Hill and Bruce Gibson you have a perfect storm.

    But they needed a crisis, oh my, they found one and did not stop there but chose to bash a hard working woman using lies – Lynn Compton.

    Shame on you Paulding for saying yes and not running on who you could have been but be a pawn for the PROGRESSIVES.

    DO NOT GIVE PAULDING YOUR VOTE as you are voting in taxing us to death!

    (24) 26 Total Votes - 25 up - 1 down
  3. George Bailey says:

    Folks,

    Jimmy Paulding, at 31, is a bit immature to be a leader in our government, and this mistake of name calling on Supervisor Lynn Compton proves my point. The SLO Progressives are desperate to get a board majority, and they will say and do anything to accomplish that goal.

    Jimmy Paulding supports a bigger government, higher taxes and wealth redistribution. His policies would result in more joblessness, more illegal immigrants and more overcrowding on the Central Coast because Gibson and Hill make backroom deals with developers to get campaign donations.

    If Paulding get’s elected, taxpayers lose.

    George

    (53) 69 Total Votes - 61 up - 8 down
  4. womanwhohasbeenthere says:

    Paulding is just looking for a job. He can’t seem to hold one for more than a year or two. This little episode speaks volumes about Paulding’s character (or lack thereof). What else does he lie about?

    (50) 66 Total Votes - 58 up - 8 down
  5. LiveHere says:

    How can a guy that has sold his soul to the progressives that promised him he would become a supervisor if he lent his name and would run for that office be a nice guy?

    I would not trust Jimmy and one day he will see that selling out for power has a high price. Well maybe Jimmy can’t wait to be Adam Hill’s puppet as Adam is Bruce’s puppet and Adam should have one of his own and a 31 year old is just the right speed.

    Lynn Compton is the BEST person for 4th District Supervisor.

    Jimmy you should be ashamed of your part in degrading women like Lynn Compton and lieing about her and her campaign!

    (49) 65 Total Votes - 57 up - 8 down
  6. NorCoMod says:

    Paulding seems like a nice enough guy and I’m sure he’s doing what he feels is best for SLO County. But it’s obvious that he’s been compromised by Tom Fulks or some other hater that’s in love with his own written word.

    (42) 46 Total Votes - 44 up - 2 down
  7. Ricky2 says:

    Facebook? Is anything at that troll heaven true enough to work up a sweat over? Geez. Delete Facebook.

    (38) 40 Total Votes - 39 up - 1 down
  8. MarkJames says:

    How does this group of men, who claim to support women, promote this type of name calling and bullying. You do not see opponents of Adam Hill talking about is face, hair or body, then why is it ok to demean Republican women?

    At 31, is Jimmy Paulding unaware of how it looks to be caught manipulating the public in order to win an election. This is the opposite of the integrity and civility Paulding says he will bring to the board.

    (56) 70 Total Votes - 63 up - 7 down
  9. rukidding says:

    Good bye Brandi Cummings. You certainly have the right to your opinion. But you just made a big mistake using your position when making the statement.

    (46) 50 Total Votes - 48 up - 2 down
    • kayaknut says:

      You think?, given what other public employees have done, some felony crimes, and that they are still on the job it seems Cummings has little to worry about, plus as long as Cummings is on the “right” side there won’t be any consequences.

      (24) 30 Total Votes - 27 up - 3 down
    • NorCoMod says:

      Goodbye to Cummings would be great if it worked that way at the county. But it doesn’t! She and other activists like her, unless they grope somebody, never get shown the door. The road goes on forever and the party never ends…..

      (35) 37 Total Votes - 36 up - 1 down
      • avidreader says:

        True…and even groping doesn’t get them axed. Cummings has a lot of nerve and then gets caught commenting on a bold faced lie! She gives the decent County employees a bad name. Her and Paulding need to be gone.

        (34) 38 Total Votes - 36 up - 2 down

Leave a Comment