Legislature passes Diablo Canyon settlement bill

August 22, 2018

Following a state Assembly vote on Monday, local government agencies now just need a signature from California Gov. Jerry Brown in order to regain the $85 million Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant retirement settlement package that they previously had appeared to lose. [Cal Coast Times]

In January, the California Public Utilities Commission approved the closure of the nuclear plant but rejected a proposed settlement in which PG&E would dole out $85 million to local government agencies as compensation for lost tax revenue. The CPUC decision upheld a ruling against the settlement issued by Peter V. Allen, an administrative law judge.

Allen’s ruling stated the proposed settlement hinged on a PG&E rate hike that would have contradicted general rate making principles and public utility law. Ratepayers should not be required to pay for local government services that are typically funded by taxpayers, Allen said.

Central Coast lawmakers Sen. Bill Monning (D-Carmel) and Assemblyman Jordan Cunningham (R-San Luis Obispo) responded to the CPUC decision by co-authoring SB 1090. The bill would amend the Public Utilities Act and require the CPUC to approve the $85 million settlement.

Additionally, SB 1090 would require the CPUC to approve a $350 million PG&E employee retention program, as initially written into the settlement agreement. The CPUC approved a smaller employee retention package of $222 million.

PG&E spokesman Blair Jones told The Mercury News the bill would result in an increase of about .2 percent to the average customer’s monthly bill. The increase would be removed from rates in 2026, Jones said.

SB 1090 passed the Assembly on a 67-1 vote. It previously passed the Senate on a 31-4 vote.

“The closure of Diablo Canyon is a major hit to our community and will be felt for decades,” Cunningham said. “While we can’t fully replace the economic benefits and energy created by Diablo Canyon, this bipartisan bill will help cushion the blow for the Diablo workforce and our community.”

Monning said he hopes Gov. Brown will be supportive of the “carefully planned retirement” of Diablo Canyon and will sign the bill.

Brown has until Sept. 30 to sign or veto the legislation.


Loading...

9
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
copperhead

Sounds like a shakedown to me. When did government become the mafia?


Paso_citizen

I believe this happened shortly after Capone was done away with. During the FBI’s efforts to rid this country of organized crime; they discovered that what the mob was doing and how they were doing it was not a bad thing – just had to make it sound legal. And we taxpayers have been shook down ever since and will be for evermore.


Myself

I see no reason to give these govt agencies any money for the closer of DC, they let this happen they need to go without,stop the give away programs and live within their means.


kayaknut

If signed all our electric rate will increase. Does anyone really think the money will not come from the ratepayers?


Paso_citizen

Yes, the PG&E biqwigs would very much like you and I to believe that this money will not come from taxpayers – only a itsy, bitsy .2%. And as they all get rewarded

with higher salaries, better benefits, etc. ; just watch your rates go up substantially more than .2%.


If Governor Brown was really on the side of the people, he would veto this stupid bill.


Mitch C

It will be fun to watch how quickly these government agencies can waste $85,000,000.


Snoid

Who will get the first raise?


rukidding

Just remember that all funds that are received into any General Funds that close to 75% are used for salaries, benefits, retirements and any other perks. So you can see who will really benefit from this extortion, tax or rate increase? Just look who is supporting it?


nunsense

not sure the September 30 deadline is correct. the rules are:

“The governor must sign or veto legislation within 12 days of the day of transmittal, or it becomes law without his/her signature. However, if the 12th day is a Sunday or a holiday, the governor has until the next working day to act. The governor has until September 30 to sign or veto legislation in his/her possession on the day the legislature adjourns (usually August 31), or it becomes law without being signed.”


so it would seem he should decide by the end of the month. I guess, maybe the 12th day is September 1, so maybe he could wait that long, but that would seem unnecessary.