San Simeon CSD versus Hearst, the games begin

May 2, 2021

OPINION by HENRY KRZCIUK

San Simeon Community Services District General Manager Charles Grace and district legal counsel Jeff Minnery, with coaching from Chair Gwen Kellas, a prominent business owner in San Simeon and an unknown developer, are formally challenging Hearst’s ownership of the land they have been encroaching upon. This after years of the district concealing the encroachment.

As the saying goes, the best defense is an offense.

This is a match to watch. The scorecard will be kept in large legal fees. Hearst is presently ahead $54,000 to zero.

Come to think of it, Hearst cannot lose. San Simeon agreed to pay all of Hearst’s legal costs to fight the district. What a fun game for our disadvantaged community.

A bit of recent encroachment history

In 2016, the district built a portion of its reverse osmosis/desalination facility on Hearst property.

In Oct. 2020, Hearst demanded payments from San Simeon because of the encroachment. The district board authorized initial damage payments of $37,000 to cover the Hearst Corporation’s costs. In accordance with that agreement, Hearst proceeded to assemble a final encroachment easement agreement which they delivered to San Simeon General Manager Charles Grace on January 28.

District Chair Kellas and General Manager Grace suppressed that agreement for weeks going as far as violating the Public Records Act. During this time, mysteriously, a legal opinion from Ogden & Fricks LLP on behalf of an unknown client was sent to the district stating that there was no encroachment and that the district owns that land.

Grace then sends attorney Roy Ogden’s opinion to Hearst and to a SLO County staff person leading an investigation into an associated state grant that could be lost because of the encroachment.

Hearst quickly rejects the anonymous legal opinion. The county with no context provided can only scratch their heads.

If that was not enough, Grace subsequently receives a confidential letter penned by the local First American Title vice president, also from an undisclosed source.

Most interesting timing for these unknown source documents.

Grace oversaw the water treatment project and has a fair amount at stake here.

By the time of the April 22 special board meeting, a Hearst bill for $17,000 was past due. This was Hearst’s costs to create the long-term encroachment easement agreement. Hearst acted in good faith and created this agreement based on the October agreement signed by San Simeon.

The district had to approve payment of the $17,000 because Hearst would not enter into further discussions until this past due bill was paid. Under the same motion, the board decided to proceed with a survey and title search.

Hearst said they would only review a survey and documents created by the district. Unlike the district, Hearst would not give any credibility to the anonymous documents.

The board directed district legal counsel Jeff Minnery to work with Grace to proceed with a survey and to propose substantial changes to the Hearst Encroachment Easement Agreement. The district now wants any reference to an encroachment removed and more. They called it “soft redlines.”

San Simeon Manager Charles Grace

Before long, the district’s costs could exceed $100,000 to save maybe $417 a month in land use fees. They agreed in Oct. 2020 to pay $5000 a year and relinquished all rights to that land.

All they had to do and could still do is sign the Hearst Encroachment Easement Agreement, which was kept secret for weeks. That is what the district did agree to do in October, but is now reneging on.

Had the district acted in good faith, as Hearst did, and signed the agreement Hearst presented on January 28, this matter would have been over.

The Hearst encroachment and its handling has brought out the worst and fully exposed the dark side of San Simeon CSD’s governance. In my opinion, special anonymous for-profit interests have successfully influenced our community’s decision making.

Information was concealed from the public for weeks and Hearst put off while waiting for an “anonymously” funded and gifted legal opinion and a “confidential” letter. Such documents were given full credence because they aligned with certain parties’ business interests.

Hearst took the proper approach and rejected these documents out-of-hand as the directors General Manager Grace should have done.

What they have done is a bad decision for our community and one that smells even worse.


Loading...

6
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
ml1999

Is Mr. Grace part time, or full time?


What us the monetary value if his consulting business contract?


Is it for hard goods (filters, pumps), or is it for services?


Lots of unanswered questions.


Hank Photo

According to Grace’s Company contract he is paid to be fulltime. He lives down south and the number of hours he works on San Simeon matters is unknown. His contract is fixed price and includes General Manager services, water and sewer operations and administration for the District.


kayaknut

When you say “down south”, you mean like San Luis Obispo or farther like Santa Barbara, or are we talking like LA or such?


Hank Photo

Thousand Oaks


fish

pay up SSCSD you won’t win.


ml1999

No lawyer here, but it seems like there are a lot of illegal activities going on here, including fraud.


Can these contracts be canceled?


How much does Mr. Grace earn, per year?


I’m knew to this drama, but apparently upwards of 6 or more board members have had conflicts of interest, and others (Grace?( have land that abuts the properties in question.


Mr. Grace has an interesting background. SSWD: “Mr. Grace holds a Jurist Doctorate from the Southern California Institute of Law…”


Pretty basic to not build on someone else’s property.