Judge resentenced Scott Peterson to life in prison without parole

December 9, 2021

Scott Peterson

By JOSH FRIEDMAN

A judge resentenced convicted killer Scott Peterson on Wednesday to life in prison for the murder of his wife Laci Peterson and the couple’s unborn child. Nonetheless, Scott Peterson is still seeking a new trial in the case.

Scott Peterson, a 49-year-old former San Luis Obispo resident, met Laci Peterson while they both were attending Cal Poly. Scott Peterson also attended Cal Poly at the same time as Kristin Smart and was once investigated for a possible connection to Smart’s disappearance, but was ruled out as a suspect in the case.

In 2002, Laci Peterson, 27, was due to give birth in four weeks when she disappeared on Christmas Eve. Scott Peterson told police he had left the couple’s Modesto home that morning to go fishing in Berkeley.

Nearly four months later, Laci Peterson’s remains washed up on a rocky shore of San Francisco Bay. A passerby found them a few miles from where Scott Peterson said he had gone fishing.

In 2004, a San Mateo County jury convicted Scott Peterson of the first-degree murder of his wife and the second-degree murder of the fetus. He was sentenced to death for the murders.

Then in 2020, the state Supreme Court overturned Peterson’s death sentence after determining individuals who could have served on the jury were wrongfully dismissed after they indicated objections to the death penalty.

After the state Supreme Court decision, prosecutors opted not to seek another death sentence. On Wednesday, a judge sentenced Peterson to life in prison without the possibility of parole for his wife’s murder, plus a concurrent sentence of 15 years to life for the second-degree murder of their unborn child.

Laci Peterson’s mother, Sharon Rocha, spoke at the sentencing hearing.

“You didn’t want the responsibility of being a father. You’re a coward,” Rocha said. “He would have been 18 years old by now. Ten months ago, you would have been free of child support and not have to worry about being responsible for a child.”

Rocha also said, “Laci and Conner will always be dead, and you will always be their murderer.”

Despite Wednesday’s resentencing, Scott Peterson’s attorneys are still arguing the murder convictions should be overturned, and their client should be granted a new trial.

In Oct. 2020, the state Supreme Court ordered San Mateo County Superior Court to determine whether a juror committed prejudicial misconduct by failing to disclose her prior involvement with other legal proceedings, including being the victim of a crime.

Juror Richelle Nice did not disclose she had obtained a restraining order against her boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend for harassing her when she was pregnant. Nice was initially an alternate juror in Peterson’s trial, but she replaced a discharged juror during deliberations. Later Nice, along with several other jurors, published a book about their experience during Peterson’s trial.

During jury selection, all potential jurors in the case were asked whether they had been a victim of a crime or involved in a lawsuit. Nice answered no to both questions.

Peterson’s lawyers say Nice filed a lawsuit to obtain a restraining order against her boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend after, in 2000, she was threatened by her while four and a half months pregnant. Based on Nice’s charges, the attacker was tried, convicted and sentenced to a week in jail, according to Peterson’s legal team.

Nice was one of two holdouts for convicting Peterson of first-degree murder of his unborn child, Peterson’s lawyers say.


Loading...

3
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
IDBOUND

Since the resentencing became public , I have wondered is this a gift in exchange for Scott’s silence in the Kristin Smart trial and a further incentive is a possible new trial also a carrot ?? .Scott knew Kristin and was at the same parties with her .Scott wouldn’t dare jeopardize his own legal situation by testifying in the Smart trial which is scheduled after Scott’s new trial hearing


Jorge Estrada

I would prefer to un-remember this travesty. So Rocha brings up child support, does she understand that she will be paying Daddy support, which includes free medical and dental, for the remainder of his life? I am a supporter of swift justice which may have a fraction of 1 percent error, the dead victims are 100 percent dead.


slocorruptionhater

1% error is too high. I am fine with people like this spending the rest of their lives in jail. None of this parole BS. Suffering in jail is real punishment.