Who will save the planet from Laura Capps and friends?

June 6, 2025

Andy Caldwell

OPINION by ANDY CALDWELL

The environmental movement reminds of the true-life story of a man who killed both of his parents and then sought to appeal to the sympathy of people by claiming the status of an orphan.

Enviros today, in the name of saving the planet from greenhouse gases (ghg) by virtue of the policies and projects they support, are killing whales and eagles and other endangered species, purposely polluting the air with sulfur dioxide, and serving to spew more ghg into the atmosphere than has been gained by any and all measures to reduce our carbon footprint. That is, the environmental movement is proving the maxim that anything in excess becomes a poison.

When the environmental movement began in earnest, some of the poster children of the movement included whales and eagles. Yet, these species have been sacrificed, respectively, on the altar of wind energy, off and on-shore. This should not be news to anyone, including the fact that the onshore wind farm in Lompoc was given permission in its permit to kill endangered species, no harm, no fowl.

As Steve Milloy reported in the Daily Caller, the most interesting and tell-tale sign that the environmental movement has lost its way and its mind? Well, the air has become so clean that scientists have discovered that the planet is warming up because air pollution used to reflect sunlight preventing it from reaching the surface of the earth. What to do?  Launch pollution, read that, sulfur dioxide, into the atmosphere to block the sunlight!

The Biden administration, and nut jobs like Bill Gates have invested tens of millions of dollars into like-experiments, even though sulfur dioxide pollution, when combined with rain, still produces acid rain. Sulfur dioxide pollution was one of the reasons the coal industry became a villain before the advent of smokestack emission controls.

Who are the villains now?

Milloy also pointed out a study published in the journal “Nature” that 80% of the global warming spike of 2023-24 was attributable to global shipping fleets having switched to a lower sulfur diesel oil. Yet, now, the environmental community is purposely releasing into our atmosphere the very same pollution they campaigned against vis-a-vis the coal industry and international shipping?

Dead whales and eagles, along with the so-called “sun blocking” efforts of launching air pollution into the atmosphere is child’s play compared to the policies in place in California that have created a disastrous fire regimen found nowhere else. That is, our local, state, and federal policies having to do with the preservation and protection of highly combustible overgrown chaparral and dangerously dense forests.

The latter end up dying after suffering from pests and diseases because of too much competition for water, sunlight, and nutrients. The resultant fires have served to eliminate any and all “progress” in reducing ghg in California.

A research paper, “Up in Smoke,” published in the journal Environmental Pollution, was based on research by UCLA and the University of Chicago. It found that California wildfires in 2020 alone caused twice the amount of greenhouse gas emissions that the state reduced between 2003 and 2019.

In other words, 2020’s wildfire season, which set a record for the number of acres burned (4.3 million) in the state, essentially wiped out nearly two decades of efforts to reduce emissions through such policies as replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy and providing incentives for electric vehicles. Moreover, the data suggests that future wildfire seasons akin to 2020 would completely zero out any reductions created by government policies and the tens of billions consumers and taxpayers are spending to implement them.

Hence, the study demonstrates that all that California has to show for its efforts is the highest gas prices in the nation and the second highest electricity prices!

Herein lies the foolishness of County Supervisor Laura Capps who wants to blame the oil industry for fires.

In reality, most all the major conflagrations that have occurred in California have to do with fallen electrical lines igniting overgrown, mostly dead chaparral, and a portion of California’s 145 million dead trees, which is clearly a result of malign, not benign, neglect of proper forest management which would include, at a minimum, logging, thinning, grazing, control burns, and fuel breaks.

To add insult to injury, when Capps courted the environmental community to stand with her in calling for the elimination of the oil industry in our county, one of the organizations to do so was the Los Padres Forest Watch which does everything it can to prevent forest management in our region!

Question for Laura Capps: When did our use of fossil fuels begin to foment wildfires? The answer is long before the invention of SUVs. Check out this chart provided by the county fire department!

Finally, here are two charts putting the oil industry’s emissions into perspective. The point here is that if we quit producing oil locally, what is going to change? Virtually nothing, as we will continue to import oil from foreign sources. The first chart was part of a report produced by the Bren School at UCSB that was commissioned by the County’s Air Pollution Control District.

Lastly, this chart demonstrates that all of California’s efforts to reduce our climate footprint by restricting local oil and gas production is a farce! Consumption has not abated. California- and Alaska- produced oil has simply been replaced by foreign imports.

In conclusion, managing our forests would do more to clear the air than anything else our government is trying to ram down our throats while destroying our economy.  Moreover, large scale fires have been with us long before the advent of SUVs. Finally, the environmental movement has become so extreme and fanatical that it is now the environment’s worst enemy.

It is safe to say no other state in the nation is this stupid.  Nor will any other state soon be paying over $8 per gallon for gasoline while accomplishing nothing with respect to the environment.

Andy Caldwell is the executive director of COLAB in Santa Barbara County and host of The Andy Caldwell Radio Show, weekdays from 3-5 p.m. on  FM 98.5, FM 99.5, AM 1240, AM 1290 and FM 96.9.

 


Loading...
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It has been too long since I made a comment for the guys who like to troll me can sink their teeth into, so, here goes:


Pretending one thinks science is stupid, whilst voting for tax cuts to Hundred Billionaires to compete in private space races is not only disingenuous (look it up), but also totally hypocritical. And using the internet, and I assume Wi-Fi to do it, is making a fool of oneself.


That said, I will agree that there are wind programs that strike me as being as corrupt as the fossil fuel stranglehold on our energy market that keeps us paying through the nose for their deadly product. (This is where the trolls will stop reading and vote me down).


However, it is not impossible that some of you can imagine that a good mix of power sources would create good old American competition, which would be the opposite of corporate welfare and holding us hostage to an economy where a handful of executives control our economy and lives. Better wind alternatives that are based onshore and designed in a way that makes them more efficient and harmless to birds do exist. They are actually decent looking as well. Check into the “tulip” designed units. They are awesome.


I abhor that offshore wind debacle that is a disaster waiting to happen and a real rip-off of the rate paying people. I know that some environmental groups have signed off on it, but remember they are usually being put in difficult positions and have to pick their battles. I do not approve of all their choices, but that is no reason to think other projects they are involved in are of no value. And please bear in mind that the bottom line on the Morro Bay project is that it is owned by an OIL COMPANY. That is what they are doing with the subsidies we give them. Promoting a massive rip-off to enrich themselves, again, at our expense.


As for the idea that California has some sort of policy that gives us a corner on the market of fire related disasters, that is patently insane. Unless one watches no news at all there should be a stark awareness that not only have we had several years in a row with escalating highest temperatures on record, but catastrophic fires have also plagued the entire planet for years. Canada is currently experiencing such an event, and the smoke is causing serious health problems to our mid-west and eastern states all the way to the Gulf.


While there is a kernel of truth in the article above, I find it filled with misinformation and misdirection and very obvious ploys. My guess is that he is actually working with the offshore wind cabal. He is obviously in favor of the latest proposed projects that would wipe out the last of our old growth forests. And please remember that it is the current federal regime that has done away with funds allocated by Congress for forest management. Not the State of California.


Well said, Andy.


Not long after, every environmentalist is turned to dust, and the Earth and California will go on their merry way, perfectly fine and beautiful. Ms Capps, like her Father and Mother before her, appeals to a certain egg-headedness. Yes, and some, get rich doing just that and seem to stay around forever.


So sad, and ignorant and destructive. You can’t (and don’t want to) see the forest for the trees. Your head is so deep in the sand you can’t and won’t see what the big picture is. Long running climate science is rock solid in its analysis of the major changes that our precious Earth is experiencing, and will be experiencing for hundreds of years ahead. And the single biggest culprit is our human civilization’s arrogant reliance on fossil fuels and related products. Your mentality of knocking the environmental movement is like standing on the edge of a small brush fire a few feet across and saying “No need to do anything, it is a small fire!”, not seeing the big picture of mountains of highly volatile tall grass and thick brush about to go up in flame, with homes (and families) lining the tops of the hills. You are one of this world’s many people who “Do nothing useful and meaningful” in support of the future of the future of humans, only criticizing instead of working with the scientific community to understand what is happening to our Pale Blue Dot that is increasingly damaging the ability of humans to survive. Hummmmm — very familiar — Just like all of the losers in our federal government in Washington D.C., who show zero interest in supporting the American public.


“…not seeing the big picture of mountains of highly volatile tall grass and thick brush about to go up in flame,…”


But that is exactly what Andy said. You can have your small fire, and do it safely, should proper forest management techniques be used.


That highly volatile tall grass wouldn’t be there, had the state mowed the grass!


Remember how every year, your are encouraged to clear at least 100′ around your home to mitigate the spread of fire fuels? Obviously, city and suburban areas have no such worry, but rural areas do indeed! So, you clear weeds, brush, scrub, small trees to make your house safe and compliant with the state advertised fire season warning.


But…along come the environmentalists, and sue you to oblivion for disturbing Kangaroo Rat habitat, red-legged frog puddles, San Joaquin Kit fox hole, or plowing under a Purple Amole. Need to cut down a rotten tree that’s likely to fall on your house, the neighbors house, or the street? Not without the scads of permits and inspections and reports and fees and ONLY the use of city/county certified arborist. Oh yeah, you also don’t get to keep the wood (Paso “heritage oak” muni code). All, hopefully, before the tree does fall. Because if it does…you get fined, or sued, for not doing anything about it!


Yes. Enviro weenies, since the first Earth Day, have done more to set BACK the environmental movement, than any gas or oil producer.


You’re brainwashed. Climate change is a hoax. Wind farms in the ocean are easily one of the dumbest ideas yet to come out of the climate “Oh, Noes, the sky is falling” movement. And electric vehicles are the answer to gas powered vehicles? Another dumb solution. Just like when they said paper bags are killing all the tress, let’s use plastic bag instead! What a disaster that was. Please don’t believe the Govt. or the people in charge. They do not care about you.


While I appreciate the deep emotional investment many have in the “planet” , but the “ science “ …the fact based science does not support Climate Alarmist claims of doom.

Indeed , when one actually does one’s homework, the effects of mankind’s footprint on climate becomes very dubious.

The history, including both warming and cooling phases since the beginning of the Holocene demonstrate the climate can change dramatically regardless of human emissions.

Atmospheric carbon dosen’t look the boogie man as satellite data shows a greening trend underway.

Decades of dire predictions have come and gone and the sea levels haven risen to wash us away and the planet continues to be a paradise for life.

I fear for those who have turned climate alarmism into almost a religion. To question their orthodoxy is to be labeled . It is career suicide in some circles, especially academia. Those who think they know better and see themselves as more virtuous than the rest of us, feel they have the right to tell us how to live. Unfortunately the “Science “ they claim to revere dosen’t align with quantifiable , measured reality.


Well put old man, but I’m not certain that “…turned climate alarmism into almost a religion” is the best characterization. More like a military dictatorship. No dissension is allowed. Discussion forbidden. Activities monitored. Compliance mandatory. Resistance is punished with violence (remember government is force and force is violence). There is no forgiveness (as there hopefully would be if it were a religion).


I wonder if you can cite sources for your claim that “the effects of mankind’s footprint on climate becomes very dubious.”


Outside of fossil fuel paid scientists and a few cranks in academia whose research has been debunked, there is not credible evidence for your claim.


The climate is warming at an alarming rate because of mega doses of carbon into the atmosphere. Period. Full stop. Show me peer reviewed science that proves that wrong.


Totally agree. I’ve always liked the analogy of the blind man approaching a cliff. He knows it’s there, but not sure how far away it is. As you say, the science is solid. And we’ve seen some of the damage already as carbon dioxide hits 430 parts per million in the atmosphere. I guess it will take losing a house or business after insurance companies have washed their hands of the situation for the science deniers to take notice. But even then, they are stubborn enough to claim it’s something else.


I’m particularly interested in how much damage is done in the gulf as the feds pull weather forecast funding from Florida and other states as hurricane season approaches (the Trump admin has claimed there is no such thing). It will not end well, in my opinion.


William Barrett wrote a great book many years ago called “Irrational Man.” That title perfectly fits our present American leaders.


Your PPM is a little off. It’s 0.043PPM. Accurate reporting is much more important than fear mongering.


According to Google:


“While 0.043% (equivalent to 430 ppm) may seem like a small percentage of the atmosphere, it’s actually an unusually high concentration of CO2. This is significantly higher than pre-industrial levels, which were around 280 ppm”


I said 430 parts per million. Is not ppm the same as parts per million?


Now you may think it’s insignificant but the fact that the concentration of carbon in the atmosphere is nearly double what it was from pre-industrial times should be alarming to us all.


You want whole numbers. Reality, is fractions.


I believe math and science are the ultimate reality.