No such thing as a free lunch?

October 3, 2011

Chris Adams

By DANIEL BLACKBURN

Children of a San Luis Obispo County school district superintendent were signed up for a federal free lunch program, causing some to wonder if school officials increase federal funding by routinely inflating estimates of poverty-level student numbers on program applications.

Chris Adams, superintendent of Coast Unified School District, and his wife make more than $26,000 a month. Nevertheless, Julie Adams filled out an application for their children to receive free lunches even though the program is only open to families showing income of 130 percent or more below the poverty line.

Chris Adams said an explanation “was simple” but he declined to discuss the application, noting his board of trustees has launched an investigation into what he called “a federal crime,” asserting the form “has been stolen from the district.” He said the idea that his school-age children would be receiving free or reduced lunches was “offensive, ridiculous.”

“I would love to give you an explanation but the problem is, there is an investigation going on,” Adams said. “The school board instigated it.”

Nevertheless, County Superintendent of Schools Julian Crocker said he believes a “proxy” search for impoverished students is the reason Adams’ wife would fill out a lunch form.

“It is possible that the Adams’ filling that form out is just within that context,” Crocker said. “That’s probably the reason he would fill that out — as would other parents who clearly don’t qualify for the free and reduced lunches — and those forms would most likely just be put aside (rejected). But the district does receive a certain amount of money because of poverty. I don’t think it is subterfuge.”

Adams scoffed at Crocker’s comments: “Julian doesn’t even have a tenth of the information… so anything he said was just his opinion. The problem is that information is confidential.”

Crocker, too, wondered about the information’s source: “I am concerned about how this information came to you,” he said. “That this information would even get out because it’s supposed to be confidential.”

Adams said that in time the story of his children’s acceptance into the program would be explained.

“What I want is for the investigation to be completed, and once it is completed, you will get your information” Adams said. “But I’m not going to get in the middle of this nonsense. I’m really not losing any sleep over it. I’ll tell you everything there is to tell.

“I have nothing to hide. This is very irritating to me.”

Schools with the required number of children in the free lunch program receive state and federal Title I funds that can mean more than a $100,000 per school, according to the United States Department of Education website. The program provides supplemental funds to school districts with the highest student concentrations of poverty to help them meet school educational goals.

After CalCoastNews acquired a copy of Adam’s federal application, school officials launched a probe to determine how that document was obtained.

Roman Munoz, of the Sacramento law firm of Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann and Girard, was retained to investigate the source of the document’s “leak;” his scope has now been widened by the board to determine if there has been abuse of the free lunch program.

The free-lunch program is administered under Title 1, an element of the No Child Left Behind Act, Crocker said. Qualified families “sometimes do not apply for whatever reason, so the school districts over the years have made a real effort — and not just Coast Unified — to have all families regardless of income fill out that form.”

There is nothing new in this, Crocker asserted.

“My understanding from districts is that it is fairly standard practice to ask all parents to fill out that form, understanding that many parents don’t exactly qualify for free and reduced,” he said. “But over the years, what has happened is, parents who don’t want to be identified for whatever reason, may not want to fill out the forms.

“But what they don’t understand is that the district uses that information for other things, other than free and reduced lunches. So it’s just easier to just ask everyone to fill them out. That way, over the years districts have been able to get that information from parents, and it does present a way for districts to get additional federal money.”


Loading...
144 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The reality people is that wasting our time typing words of condemnation on the internet is fruitless and perhaps we should be doing what those in New York City have been doing the past few days in standing up for what is right and not tolerating what is wrong (yet, and even so, in a peaceful and American way) but if we are in large enough numbers–they will know we are serious. It is wise to be aware that there was a time in San Luis Obispo County and many other counties in this country where disreputable people such as this were quickly shown to the border being told not to return and if they were fortunate, they would leave our community and feel fortunate that doing so without tar and feathers on their hides.


Seriously, I almost feel like just making a sign right now and going to stand in the rain at city hall for the next few weeks, I don’t care if I’m the only at this point lol. If I stood there long enough, maybe I’d eventually attract some attention, though I would likely tire of the inevitable jeers and stupid comments as I did when standing with a handful of people on the street corner in Santa Maria protesting the war in Iraq.


QUOTING TRUTHSAYER: “The reality people is that wasting our time typing words of condemnation on the internet is fruitless…”


—————-


And a Pffffffffffffffft!! to you, too.


Do you really believe that internet comments to this type of public-official douchebaggery does not have an impact?


How long had the Kelly-Ogren little shack-up and mutually beneficial political hand-jobs for each others’ careers (major conflicts of interest) gone on before Karen Velie reported about it and we all pitched a bloody fit, right here, on this website?


The Tribune had, of course, buried it’s collective head up the County’s kiester and refused to mention it.


Well, guess what is happening today? The BOS is reporting on their –ahem–investigation into the Ogren-Kelly relationship and their actions as public officials while the relationship is going on.


Of course, it will probably be a “move-along-nothing-to-see” response, but at least THIS part of dealing with the Ogren-Kelly deal is over, and we can move on to filing complaints with the state AG.


Don’t ever say that internet activism isn’t productive. I’ve seen far too many examples of just the kind of posting that goes on here–bitching about it and some poking around for other details–that have led to positive change.


I was just saying that to someone yesterday.

I bet at least 70% of the county is disgusted with what the County did to DeVaul.

But nothing. We let them continue on as they are.


We are disgusted with the fraud, high salaries, etc.

But we are doing nothing.


We need leadership.


Isn’t there somthing we can do?


How about if someone in Cambria just showed up for a school board meeting!


He should be thrown in jail merely for accepting such a salary from the school district. Do people have no shame?!


I do know that it is a matter of practice for public agencies to simply throw spaghetti at the wall when it comes to funding, apply for everything and see what sticks.. even if it’s just a mistake (they certainly won’t correct it).


My views tend toward anarchocapitalism. But if someone has an idea about how we can still have effective government, and we can get control of these things right now, which is what needs to happen, then I’d really like to hear it. I certainly don’t think we should have to wait multiple election cycles to deal with problems in our own community that are clearly unethical and have consequences right here and now.


We probably shouldn’t trash him until we know if his kids actually got free lunch. If they did, then he is in the wrong. If they did not, then maybe he has a good reason for what he did.


It is not like me to be reasonable for once.


I disagree with your statement regarding the illegality of fraudulently applying for government funding.


If you read the posts here, you’ll see that there are some real issues here, such as what appears to be the school district filing for all students, without the parents’ consent or knowledge, and signing (according to the forms on the USDA’s website for the school lunch program) include providing the last four numbers of your SS#.


It’s an honest mistake. She thought the income limit was 1300% of poverty, not 130%.


Like many elementary school students, some government workers have a difficult time understanding percentages and fractions.


26,000 a month!? I should have gone to work for the government!


No kidding and all that money is paid to this husband and wife team from the school system. What’s worse is they both are knee deep in defrauding the taxpayer funded programs intended for the impoverished. She filled out a fraudulent form for her kids and he approves families for the program that haven’t even applied, how did that happen? We pay $330K a year for them to defraud us!


You could buy one-half of an SLOCounty judge for that much.


His wife does not work for the school district however he has hired his wife and other family members… but it was approved by our school board… so maybe we need to start there!


shelworth, We are often told if the govt doesn’t pay these kinds of salaries they won’t get the good employees. This appears to be evidence to the contrary. Big salary and no morals.


Dan Blackburn will be on Dave Congalton in 5 minutes to fill us in on some added details. It will be a talk show so we will probably hear from some callers who might elucidate.


KVEC 920AM


I just love this part:


After CalCoastNews acquired a copy of Adam’s federal application, school officials launched a probe to determine how that document was obtained.


So, it’s the old Nixon Defense Strategy, is it?


When it is obvious that a whistleblower has provided information that indicates a San Luis Obispo County school district, Coastal Unified School District, has engaged in fraud and/or other malfeasance (and at the highest level of Coastal Unified’s administration: the district’s superintendent)…


…do district officials immediately start investigating the allegations and information provided by the whistleblower?


do district officials rush to secure documents from the government officials indicated, before they can be destroyed?


…do they do ANYTHING to address the attempted fraud perpetrated against the county, state and feds?


NO, just like Nixon, they immediately launch an investigation into the identity of the whistleblower.


The only things missing are a court order shutting down CCN from publication, .and superintendent Chris Adams doing his own take on Hamlet, as did Nixon after his fall following the Watergate disaster, wandering the halls of the WH at night while holding a bottle, in drunken communion with the portraits of dead presidential predecessors.


Wow Mary, I remember those days well too. A fool and a crook (“I am not a crook!”) for a President, determined to ride out the storm he created by blaming others, finally claiming “I am not a quitter” and then quitting in disgrace. What a piece of shit he was, just like many in our county who either do evil deeds or allow others to by their inaction (DA, Board of Supes, former Sheriff and many others with respect to the massive economic fraud perpetrated against over 5000 residents here and rampant malfeasance of various elected, appointed and hired hacks in our county). SLO is really not much better than Bell, though here it is county wide. School administrators, cops, firemen, judges, the damn DA and probably more have cheated us, beaten us, milked us for all they can get. Those and others have ignored the pleas of victims of crimes. And in this case to spend any energy seeking the whistleblower is criminal; follow the money, not the messenger!


Nixon’s undoing was his paranoia, bitterness and obsession with revenge, all three of which are Capricorn traits I try to avoid at all costs.


I knew Nixon supporters and even they had no clue how paranoid he was. I don’t think anybody really knew.


I found out from my kids, that we too were “automatically enrolled” in this program despite our actual financial status, which we were never asked about nor did we fill out any paper requesting this program.

We just got a letter in the mail last week (it is now October and the school year is more than half over) from the school district stating a mistake had been made and we were not really eligible.

The excuse given was because of our zip code. Along with a few other communities, we were automatically enrolled because of enumerator.

My kids have never taken a free lunch nor ever eaten in the cafeteria at school, they always take a lunch and snacks from home.

No wonder the school district is broke…


I find that to be an absurd practice! Is this something school districts throughout the nation do?


Did you sign the form? If not, who did? Can you get a copy of your own form?


Whomever signed that form committed fraud. It would be nice to know who it was.


We did not sign anything.

IMHO, someone was being paid to do their job right, did not and screwed up, and is probably still there collecting their salary.

Using a zip code as the basis for qualifying a community is BS, isn’t that reverse descrimination…


Well, according to the forms on the USDA’s website for school lunches, they had to put the last 4 #s of your SS# on the form, too. They also had to sign other forms which gives the government to share the information with pretty much anybody they want to.


This would mean that the extra funding for your kids free lunch was made available all this time. Did they purchase the lunches that they erroneously qualified your children to receive and then throw the food away?


After all I’ve read , I would think the credits have already been established for the school to claim a higher % of low income children than actually attend the schools in the district. Since when do people qualify for poverty level income classifications based on zip code, this isn’t Watt’s? I have to wonder if this odd demand that everyone complete an application for a free lunch while qualifying families that are not eligible could have something to do with the Adam’s consulting business. If those schools that she consults for manage to qualify for lower grading requirements, then it makes it appear that she has increased the overall test scores through her consulting program? Just saying, something here doesn’t make any sense. No sense what so ever. I wonder if this “SUDDEN ACKNOWLEDGMENT” , recognizing that families having been approved for free lunches that don’t meet the requirements has anything to do with the latest disclosure/inquiry by Dan Blackburn? The school district sure did lawyer up fast! Something here really stinks and since Adam’s is the head of the program, I’d say he is definitely guilty of mismanagement and incompetence if not fraud.


If it turns out that this is a system-wide fraud (somebody has to be signing those forms), then a connection to Mrs. Adams’ consulting business would be icing on the cake.


Where is the authorization to automatically enroll children into a federal program? Especially since the forms require that the parents sign each form (and there are a few in the packet), including the last 4 numbers of their SS#?


http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Translations/English/E-SchoolMealApp.pdf


I must be missing something here. This couple filled out the form just like all other famlies are asked to do by the district, regardless of eligibility? It’s dificult to fathom that a couple of such means would weasle free school lunches.


Also, how does one earn an income of “130 percent or more below the poverty line.”?


Well, I would like to see some evidence that it is actually something every district does for all their students, or if it is just for the district Adams runs….or that it actually is a practice at all. It could be that just one school does it, for all we know.


Okay, made me look.


“USDA Food and Nutrition Service, School Meals”

http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/frp/frp.process.htm


Under “Prototype Applications” (“English” “pdf”):

“Free and Reduced Price School Meals Application and Verification Form”

http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Translations/English/E-SchoolMealApp.pdf


Starts with a letter to the parents the school district can use, instructions for filling it out, and other forms. There are different forms for different categories of students (i.e., Native-American students). On each one, the parent has to sign and provide the last 4 numbers of their SS#. Also, there are other forms where the parent has to sign (and provide SS#) to allow the sharing of information between different government programs.


This appears to be something the school districts can customize because the letter to the parents has a place at the top where the school district would put its letterhead.


However, if anyone has any more insight into this, I’d love to read about it.


But I have questions…


Why is this “prototype” form available to the public viewing?


Is this actually something the school sends out (which is what it looks like to me)? If it is, why is Coastal Unified School District simply filling all the forms out and, apparently, signing them? Providing the last four #’s of parents SSN#s without getting their permission?


Also, Chris Adams’ claim that a “crime” had been committed by his bogus school lunch program form being shared is nonsense, if this is a form that the school just fills out for everyone and signs for them and puts their SS# on. Adams, and all parents, information is apparently available to the school to be used, printed out, and everything else, whenever they want. It’s not a state secret.


They are talking about a “percent difference,” I believe.