Supervisor Gibson’s failures to disclose

October 25, 2011

Bruce Gibson

By KAREN VELIE

Bruce Gibson, a San Luis Obispo county supervisor who boasted on his campaign website that he advocates transparency, is under fire for failing to disclose some of his assets as required by law.

State law requires that supervisors fill out a statement of economic interest each year, and disclose stocks they own. In addition, they are required to report when they purchase or sell stocks on a 700 form filed annually with the county clerk recorder.

“Supervisors have to claim any stocks they own over $2,000 in value which relate to business enterprise in San Luis Obispo County,”  said County Clerk Recorder Julie Rodewald. “They are also required to disclose when they acquire or dispose of stock.”

However,  Gibson  has reported he owned two dozen stocks one year, but just a couple one year later —  though he disclosed selling only two oil company stocks.

Gibson, who was first elected 2nd District Supervisor in 2006, did not return requests for comment.

During his victory speech, Gibson jeered at opponents who called into question his claimed status of “farmer” and attempted to paint the candidate as an “oil baron.”

When Gibson ran for office in 2005, he reported ownership of only two stocks, Chevron and Conoco Phillips. In January 2006, the supervisor — who formerly worked in the oil industry — sold his oil stock before voting a month later in favor of a project involving the California-based Chevron.

Then in his 2006 filing, Gibson noted the sale of the controversial oil stock and posted 22 other stocks he claimed he owned including $10,000 to $100,000 each in stock from Wells Fargo, Washington Mutual, Bank of America, Pepsico, Verizon, and Microsoft.

A year later, even though he did not disclose selling any of his stocks, he claimed only stock ownership in a farm supply company.

A few weeks ago, Los Osos resident Bob Shanbrom filed a complaint with the California Fair Political Practices Commission noting Gibson’s ownership of a real estate company. Shanbrom is concerned with Gibson’s push to change a vacation rental ordinance while he owns a Cayucos rental and a real estate company operating in Fresno.

“While the complaint is in process, I ask that Supervisor Gibson suspend all political activity regarding the vacation rental ordinance,” Shanbrom said in an email to the board of supervisors.

In 2000, Encino Grande LLC was created with prominent San Luis Obispo attorney Warren A. Sinsheimer listed as the agent of service and Gibson’s home address as the business address. An Internet search shows sales of $330,000 and five employees in the company that Gibson claims does all of its business outside of SLO County.

And while the 700 form requires supervisors report “any financial interest in any business entity located in or doing business in your agency’s jurisdiction, ” FPPC officials told CalCoastNews that if the company is not operating or managed in SLO County, Gibson is not required to list the business on his 700 form even if the LLC is listed with a local address.

Even so, Shanbrom questions why the supervisor who claims to be transparent is not open about his real estate holdings.

“If people are looking for a perfect magnification of Occupy Wall Street they can look at Bruce, a real estate guy who is being true to realtors,” Shanbrom said. “If you turn a home into a vacation rental you can make a two to three times the gross.

“We purchased a pleasant single family residence and he is attempting to up-zone our neighborhoods to benefit real estate interests and land speculators.”


Loading...
64 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

With over 70 transactions with government agencies in Fresno by Bruce Gibson’s LLC, the question must be asked: Who are the agencies involved in these leases and how many of these Federal agencies have had business before the SLO Board of Supervisors? When a Supervisor is getting a paycheck from a federal agency he should step down and not vote on the issue. When a County Supervisor is receiving more from the Federal Government than he is from the jurisdiction that he represents then that is a direct conflict of interest. There are a lot of questions here and this all proves that Bruce’s campaign was deceitful when he listed his occupation as farmer. What he is, is a part of a corporation that makes it’s money off the federal government. Instead of putting District 2 taxpayers first, he is lining his pockets with federal government contracts. While he’s helping to kill the private sector in this county, he’s making a fortune with his corporate connections in Fresno. This guy is a real piece of work.


Good work, dude/dudess! ITA. I really think this calls for a State Audit (after Jan. 1, of course).


+^


He is indeed a farmer, he’s doing a fine job of cultivating and growing his personal worth.


Yeah, and just like a farmer, Gibson is amply spreading around a lot of bull**** to grown his personal worth.


Whoa, is any one really surprised here?

This is the MO of the current board of sups and especially those who have strings attached going back a long time to many agencies they have passed work on to. Just follow the political mandates and it will lead you to the money…


Maybe it’s time for San Luis Obispo County to adopt an “anti-nepotism” law. I’m just stunned at how much corruption there is in this County.


It really is astounding, isn’t it?


Amazing! $2,208,072 in government contracts since Supervisor Gibson has been in office from 2004-2010 to Encino Grande LLC in Fresno. Can anyone say conflict of interest.


http://www.gsacontractswon.com/department/gsa/encino-grande-llc-010047087.asp?yr=10


Actually, my mistake, Gibson became Supervisor in 2006. My comment about a conflict of interest still stands.


My understanding of the conflict of interest laws is that a supervisor cannot vote on items that will involve the potential for financial gain. I also understand that Gibson is a supervisor in San Luis Obispo County, NOT FRESNO. Can you clarify a connection on any of his votes in this county that may have contributed to his financial gain?


His Chevron stock was SOLD, not bought, a year before he was even able to vote on the Chevron issue. No potential for gain there either.


When the viewshed ordinance came up, he stepped down from discussion or voting on the issue, I seem to recall.


Mixed-up facts in this article and vague generalizations along with off the mark connections like yours really contribute to phony hysteria of misdeeds. Got any accurate and relevant facts?


The following two California codes should answer your questions.


I believe this really is a question for the state auditor, controller and AG to deal with. It is obvious that the county’s administration, and its BOS, are so corrupt I would not trust them to correctly count the number of kittens this danged stray cat that adopted us just delivered (jeebus, I really thought she was just plump and furry) if there was any possible way they could skin a quarter out of the deal.


—————————–


http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=87001-88000&file=87200-87210


GOVERNMENT CODE

SECTION 87200-87210


87200. This article is applicable to elected state officers, judges

and commissioners of courts of the judicial branch of government,

members of the Public Utilities Commission, members of the State

Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, members of

the Fair Political Practices Commission, members of the California

Coastal Commission, members of planning commissions, members of the

board of supervisors, district attorneys, county counsels, county

treasurers, and chief administrative officers of counties
, mayors,

city managers, city attorneys, city treasurers, chief administrative

officers and members of city councils of cities,
and other public

officials who manage public investments, and to candidates for any of

these offices at any election.
…..


——————–


http://www.aroundthecapitol.com/code/getcode.html?code=./gov/87001-88000/87300-87314


California Codes, Government Code

Section 87300-87314


My recollection is that his ascent to power was largely based on his viewshed work. He threw his neighbors under the bus to appease the Sierra Club. He later recused himself due to an FPPC investigation, which was requested by his neighbors.


I have no way of knowing whether he is walking on both sides of the street with Encino LLC; although his history indicates that is not unlikely.


Just a comment about the facts Karen Velie stated about selling his stocks in January 2006 and voting the next month as supervisor on Chevron. He was not elected to office until November of 2006 and took office weeks after that.

Also, a look at his old website shows his seismology work in Texas from 1976-1984. That’s more than twenty years before he took office. I guess we should crucify everyone that has had multiple jobs in their lifetime, especially if they leave “oil” to go into farming.


Someone’s past history before being elected becomes a problem when:


1. They don’t disclose, as required, when running for office.


2. They become elected and use the power of the office held to commit fraud on the voters (Fraud: intentional deception made for personal gain or to damage another individual).


3. They break conflict-of-interest regulations (in this case, state and county).


4. The pull a bait-and-switch scam, like President Obama has and is doing, where he made campaign promises in 2008 to get elected, and then, once elected, flipped and either didn’t perform on the promises he made, or actually did the exact opposite of what he promised.


It’s always important to disclose all your substantial financial interests as an elected official, whether it’s required by law or not.


Bruce was on the San Luis Obispo County Planning Commission and voted on the project as a Planning Commissioner in 2006.


OK. In the interest of transparency, who are the five employees, where is the property involved and who are the partners? Exactly how much money does Bruce Gibson have and where did it come from? These are legitimate questions for a public official and it’s time for some answers.


“Exactly how much money does Bruce Gibson have and where did it come from? These are legitimate questions for a public official and it’s time for some answers.” Really? You think everybody who serves in some podunk public office should have to open their entire financial lives to your inspection? Get a life. California has good financial disclosure laws, the FPPC enforces them rigorously (local officials have been fined for minor violations), and they say his not listing his Bakersfield enterprise is correct; case closed. As for stock ownership, all of the stocks listed as having been purchased after his first Form 700 are national companies; he didn’t have to disclose them in the first place since their primary place of business is outside SLO county, but apparently doing so in the interest of transparency has given Karen Velie another excuse to slander a basically good, if humanly flawed, person.


Touché.


I was going to post a question regarding Gibson’s income/legitimacy as a “farmer,” but you’re right, within reason, it’s really not my business how he makes his money.


SLOBODY: “enforces them rigorously (local officials have been fined for minor violations)…”


Pfft. Who cares about fines? Their money-bags cronies can easily make that up to them without much effort.


Now, if the FPPC yanked them from office and forced an election for their replacement–then I’d be impressed.


You ask,”You think everybody who serves in some podunk public office should have to open their entire financial lives to your inspection?” The answer is “yes”. When you run for public office everything you’ve ever done and your financial past are all open to public scrutiny.


I think you need to do a little more research on the Form 700. If you own stock in a company whose primary place of business is in another jurisdiction, you must still list them if they do business in the County. Let’s say Verizon wants to build a cell tower and Supervisor Gibson owns stock in Verizon. His voting on that is a conflict of interest under the law. There are many other examples. You should pick up a copy at the Clerk Recorder’s office and see what the requirements really are. The people have a right to know when and if a public official stands to gain from the votes that he is making.


“Humanly flawed”? ROFLMAO! Why didn’t you just say “But he’s just a puppy” and be done with it0 then (by your logic) we would not have the right to assume he will limit his bathroom needs to toilets and urinals.


Maybe that’s not the best metaphor, but you get my point.


Yes, we have a right to know how he makes his money. That’s why there are disclosure forms. Otherwise, we would not be able to track his conflicts of interests, abuse of power as an elected official, and other state and county ethics violations.


If he doesn’t want to disclose how he makes his money, then he has a choice: don’t run for public office.


I am wondering, what kind of other “humanly flaws” that violate state and county ethics violations do you endorse?


How far do you think WJ Clinton would have gotten if one of his cronies gave the “ahhh, he’s just humanly flawed, so all that stuff he did doesn’t count.”


I’ll tell you what–the state auditor and AG didn’t give rat’s patoot if Mayor Rizzo and his four accomplices in the City of Bell were “humanly flawed.” Indeed, after finding out the depth of their ethical and financial depravity, i think it can be safely assumed that they are, INDEED, “humanly flawed.”


So Gibson is “humanly flawed.” Yes, we get it. That’s what Karen Velie’s article was all about.


I’m not going to defend Gibson but I’m also not going to jump on the bandwagon. I’ll wait until more comes out, so far this stuff might have explanations.


So, what’s not to believe already? I’m curious.


I haven’t heard his side of the story. I see lot of things that on surface look bad but we don’t’ really know what stocks he’s sold or what he owns or if he made any simple mistakes. I’m not saying that he’s innocent of these charges but until I hear his side and until I see facts I’m not going to join the lynch mob. I still believe (in most cases) innocent until proven guilty, sadly that sentiment seems to be going away.


I understand where you are coming from, TQ, and admire it. However, it’s one thing to discard the wisdom of the “fool-me-once,-shame-on-you,-fool-me-twice,-shame-on-me” school of thought.


Clearly, unless there is a known reason not to trust a person, then, yes, assume innocence and give them a chance to explain it.


Also, if the source is known to be flawed (i.e., anything from Fox News), then, certainly, give the subject the benefit of the doubt until a more credible source documents it, one way or the other.


Karen Velie’s track record for investigating the convoluted political skullduggery of SLOCounty politics has a danged fine track record of being accurate. So the soruce is credible, IMO.


Wish I could say the same for Gibson.


He already has a few strikes against him, and not just the Velie article here. He was also involved in the debacle in Los Osos. And another thing–he said bupkiss while Adam Hill insulted and cut off the microphone when the Los Osos peeps went for their three minutes of public speaking. They showed up at the time on the Brown-Act-correct published agenda. However, Jim Grant, the weiner of an administration and, in a very Brown-Act-violating move, without public notice, changed his presentation to the first thing in the morning.


I’m seeing a pattern in Gibson where he thinks he–and his fellow supervisors–are totally above the laws and regulations to which the plebians like us must adhere.


Just my opinion, your mileage may vary.


If you read kapaw’s post he brings up issues ie the Fresno thing which also crossed my mind, who cares if he’s pushing the vacation rental thing here while owning a rental or/and real estate holdings in Fresno? Circumstances are different there than here and it’s not this county.


Again, I don’t want to defend him as I could be wrong I just see that each of these issues could have explanations. Gibson might very well think he’s above the law, our local politicians have been a disappointment to me. But I don’t think this article is enough to go after the guy.


I like Karen’s articles, I like CCN but I don’t believe in blindly following anyone without question. Karen is human and like me she makes mistakes. I still feel that the whole school lunch scandal was not the best reporting, to me it was fishing for problems that weren’t there and in some cases were unproven. I believe that a family’s name was tarnished over something that might have been a simple misunderstanding and some of the numbers reflected in the article were proven to be off which should have put doubt about the entire issue. I also didn’t agree with the article that Karen put out awhile back on John King, I felt it was one sided. But this is an opinionated news source, it’s not like the LA Times it’s more like an op ed type of publication so I get what I expect and I don’t mind that, most of the time I agree with her.


As far as Hill’s issue with cutting off the mic as well as a few other bad things that he’s done, I’m not going to defend any of them, they stand on their own as being in bad taste and in some instances probably violations of the Brown Act. But I don’t believe it would be very professional at this point for his fellow Supes to speak about these issues. Plus they do need to have a working relationship, if they start bashing each other then we will end up with nothing getting done (ie. Washington).


He also owns a rental in Cayucos. Another conflict of interest.


No offense, but I think kapaw’s posts have the whiff of “Gibson crony” about them.


I mean, come on. He actually indicates that there is something wrong with politicians revealing the sources of their income? One of the excuses he makes is that Gibson is “humanly flawed”?


Charles Manson was “humanly flawed,” too. In fact, every criminal is “humanly flawed.”


I think Gibson’s silence when the BOS violated the Brown Act by, first, letting Jim “Spineless-Wonder” Grant give his 2-page hand-job of an “investigation” at a time different than the one published in the agenda, and then when Hill insulted the Los Osos peeps and then cut off the microphone and had a Los Osos speaker removed–that speaks a lot to his character and his approach to his job as a BOS.


Clearly, violating serious regulations that govern the way BOS business is conducted is not important to Gibson, and, in fact, he accepts it as if it is normal and acceptable.


So, as kapaw says, yes, Gibson is “humanly flawed.” I don’t accept the ways in which Gibson is flawed and the impact it has on how our county is run. IMO, it makes him unfit for being on the BOS.


Just my opinion, your mileage may vary.


Watch how our friends at the Tribune won’t touch this story with a 10 foot pole. Go Karen Velie! Find the others and take them down.


With all this great information presented to us, with facts, who has been taken down? We still have the school supervisor and his wife earning $26,000 a month (hopefully not getting anymore free lunches for the kids), we have Paavo and his girlfriend earning their overpaid salaries, we have the do nothing DA because the corrupt judges are busy with their health clubs as they drive on the taxpayer dollar, we have the fireman still drawing his salary, Patterson, Gibson, and the idiot of all Hill sitting back saying “just don’t say anything and this too will go away…”. We are so screwed!!!


It’s obvious the county is part of the corruption problem, so we really cannot look to them for a solution.


We have to rely on the state. Start filing those forms now and then, on Jan. 1, 2012, when the new superpowers of our state auditor are in force, the state auditor, controller and AG can do what they did–and are doing–to the City of Bell.


Come on–it’s worth the effort. Wouldn’t it be great to see four of the BOS doing an orange frog walk, like the four council members of the City of Bell were forced to do when they were indicted?


Where is there proof that the school supe’s kids received free lunches?


They signed up for it, with the rest of the deserving families. By reports, the school year is well underway before the school staff and cafeteria staff check the forms for suitability.


If the Adams kids didn’t get subsidized lunches, it is logical that the rest of the children of families who submitted forms didn’t get subsidized lunches, which I highly doubt occurred.


Think. The only source for that information is a very conflict-of-interest-laden source: Adams and the district staff where he is superintendent of the district.


Don’t you think they have a vested interest in covering this up? Making it go away?


Such a compromised source should NEVER be assumed to be telling the truth–unless the truth just happens to be the exact same as what benefits the compromised source.


We need a state audit and investigation of the state education department. At this point, the county schools and, indeed, the county itself is completely unreliable for the truth.


Karen Velie wrote a great article. Assessing the moral character of our elected representatives can either give or take away from the credibility of their decisions.


More evidence that Bruce Gibson is a deceptive hypocrite. Surprise, surprise.


He kinda looks like a hamster, too; for that alone he should be fired.


Ugluk, once again, a voice of reason. ^+


and I wonder WHY we can’t find a few ‘honest folks’ working for public betterment?…


Because “honest” folks don’t spend their time trying to control what other people do for “public betterment”