Hill’s support base dwindling

February 11, 2015
Stew Jenkins

Stew Jenkins

OPINION By STEW JENKINS

The San Luis Obispo Tribune thankfully evolved into a Liberal Newspaper after McClatchy purchased it from Knight-Ridder. Liberal or conservative, it is difficult to accept the editorial board republishing in its Feb. 6 editorial the political spin supporting New Jersey style pay-to-play Supervisor Adam Hill – who masquerades as a Liberal.

The Tribune, as a Liberal paper should have performed deeper critical analysis leading to the change in leadership on the Board of Supervisors Feb. 3.

The Tribune’s Feb. 6 editorial, which characterized Supervisor Frank Mecham’s selfless act stepping aside to elect Debbie Arnold Chair and Lynn Compton Vice-Chair with a “partisan Republican” and “tea party” manipulation, simply restated Bruce Gibson’s “viewpoint” published the same day. This completely overlooked the most important factor leading to Adam Hill’s ouster as vice chair of the Board of Supervisions – having lost the support of so many Liberal Democrats; Hill had not a single defender outside of Gibson.

Just as Republicans shed association with Supervisor Mike Ryan in 2004 for his offensive behaviors, more and more Democrats are finding it difficult to support Hill in 2015. Liberal Democrats increasingly find Hill’s actions so embarrassing that he can no longer be supported.

Certainly there were partisan Republicans ready to speak against Hill being elevated to a leadership position at Tuesday’s board meeting; but so were at least one Democratic Party former mayor, at least one Green Party activist, and a former Democratic Party nominee for State Assembly.

And the idea that Hill is working for liberal policies just doesn’t wash. Supervisor Hill is frequently perceived as driven by how his public actions will benefit him, instead of how those actions help or hurt his constituents.

Platitudes about the environment easily fall from his lips; yet his votes on development and construction appear more and more tied to whether the developers will support or hurt Hill’s political ambitions.

Hill gives lip service to helping working families. But in two terms he has yet to push for a single project-labor agreement on any of the public construction the Board of Supervisors commission. Uniquely, project-labor-agreements are the only lawful vehicle providing a public projects a bidding process guaranteeing the benefit of union-quality craftsmanship and, by mandating Local Hiring Requirements, which then multiply the public dollars spent to create 400 percent to 700 percent in new local economic activity.

The nominally higher upfront cost of a public project built through a project-labor-agreement is more than offset by the economic expansion and resulting tax revenue received by a county, city or school district constructing buildings, roads and infrastructure. Had Hill pushed for public project-labor agreements when he was in the majority more working people could afford the cost of a home in our coastal county.

Anyone who watched the February 3rd Board of Supervisors’ meeting saw that Hill lacked, and Mecham demonstrated, the selflessness for leadership.

Stew Jenkins is a former secretary and vice-chair of the San Luis Obispo County Democratic Central Committee who successfully defended the SLO Democratic Party to establish political party rights in Wilson v. San Luis Obispo County Democratic Central Committee (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 489; Review Denied Cal. Supreme Court; Review Denied U.S. Supreme Court; and was the Democratic Nominee for State Assembly in 2004.


Loading...
26 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Stew Jenkins has a right to his opinion. Adam Hill has served as Supervisor with a good balance of votes. He is well informed and just because he doesn’t vote the way Stew thinks he should doesn’t make them wrong. I’m paying close attention to the Agenda and what is important to the County as a whole and will make my opinions known to all of the Supervisors. By the way I supported Stew in is campaign for the Assembly.


“Adam Hill has served as Supervisor with a good balance of votes.” Someone is mainlining the kool-aid, not just drinking it …


I am as about as far left as one can get before you venture into Communism (which I don’t support at all) and I have had many issues with the way Supervisor Hill has voted in the past. Even if all of his votes did pass environmental muster, how can you be so supportive of a man who presents himself as petty, vindictive and just plain mean-spirited far too many times, and not just in private, but in public forums?


As I have said here on CCN before, Supervisors Hill and Gibson may have some environmental credibility, but they are sadly lacking in being a representative of progressive values or a liberal’s embrace of being inclusive to the political process.


If Mr. Hill could grow up and act more like a responsible adult, not allow himself to fire off mean spirited emails or opinion pieces but temper his upset or anger into a more balanced and rational approach, he might find himself getting more respect and support. He is an intelligent person, he just cannot seem to keep his temper to himself, IMO.


Stew thinks he’s liberal, but he’s not. He has his own agenda. He’s not a conservative, AFAIK, but his opposition to Hill here is suspect.. Stew is an ESTABLISHMENT . Not saying it’s bad, just functionary.


Stew brings the pitchforks to the protest, but I would not count on him to back me up in the foxhole if needed.


Is there anything else to report on or do we just continue to harass the terrible twosome everyday? This is entertaining-kind of like TMZ harassing Bruce Jenner.


Maybe harassing these two misfits will get this more into the public eye,maybe it will get voters off their asses and vote for competent people to replace them,maybe just maybe.


One can only hope


I don’t know.

Short of physically assaulting someone that isn’t a “like minded person”, I don’t know what else Hill could have done during his first term that wouldn’t have compelled a thinking person to prevent him from having a second term. And yet, they chose Hill over Ed Waage. I guess it’s true that you get the kind of government that you deserve. Although it’s hard to believe anybody deserves to be governed by a Bozo like A. Hill.


I live in SLO and personally know there are many in this town who drink the Kool-aid and will vote for the most repugnant person on the planet if that person is a democrat and the opponent is a republican.


I also live in SLO and personally know there are many in this town who drink the Kool-aid and will vote for the most repugnant person on the planet if that person is a republican and the opponent is a democrat.


Next irrelevent post please.


Colab , and Hill are a Joke.

Also anyone who would vote against drought measures, durring this time.

its politics as usual . not what good for the community .


“New Jersey style pay-to-play Supervisor Adam Hill – who masquerades as a Liberal.”


LOL


Dee Torres masqerades as someone who is interested in helping the homeless.


It’s very ironic that Hill, Gibson, Tom Fulks and crew all pushed for Facebook comments on the trib to “know” and politically target comment writers (with a name, party affiliation, address, you too can be on a list)


To the point, the Tribune editorial board or more properly The anonymous Tribune editorial board that never names who wrote the opinion or if they even wrote them in the first place.


Hey Trib we aren’t fooled.


Many newspapers have op-ed columns which are not attached to a name.


When it comes down to it, it doesn’t matter WHO did it, but WHAT is in the article or op/ed.


…”Having lost the support of so many Liberal Democrats; Hill had not a single defender outside of Gibson.”


Word.


The sickening part is that even with Gibson’s foibles, he has enough firepower to cover for both himself and Hill. How can this be?


Racket, you must be asking tongue in cheek…“How can this be?” Please return to the December 8, 2014 “Daily Brief” on this website for a refresher course: County supervisors in line for holiday pay raise (http://calcoastnews.com/2014/12/county-supervisors-line-holiday-pay-raise/).


Here’s my comment paraphrased:


Bruce Gibson “primed” ALL County employees with a $1000 end-of-year gift. Via strategic baiting of County employees in his [benevolent] action, Mr. Gibson is assured of ALL County employees’ overwhelming support in future elections. Period. If YOU are a County employee who was in receipt of said bonus check for DOING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, would YOU cast anything other than a “Yes” vote for Bruce [who so thoughtfully arranged for your gift]?


Nothing’s changed. He’s still the same Bruce today.


“Thankfully evolved into a liberal newspaper” , I thought newspapers were supposed to be unbiased reporters of the events and not inject their points of view.


Naive?


That’s actually somewhat a misconception. Most newspapers historically have participated in politics via editorials and what stories and issues they present. I think journalists benefit from the half-truth that their publications are unbiased–if readers believe the news is unbiased then they view it as the truth. Historically, newspapers competed vigorously over ideas and multiple newspapers existed in one market which increased the tendency to have a contrasting view between competing news sources.


In short, news is a business that caters to it’s audience, and editors always have a business our political angle. The Trombone’s angle strongly supports our local entrenched progressives—a very SLO-centric position that leaves the rest of the county a bit disenfranchised.


I’ll back up my opinion for the down-voters:


Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers.

Basic Books. 1981. 416 pp.


“American journalism has been regularly criticized for failing to be ‘objective. …the press has repeatedly been taken to task for not presenting the day’s news ‘objectively.’


But why do critics take for granted that the press should be objective? Objectivity is a peculiar demand to make of institutions which, as business corporations, are dedicated first of all to economic survival. It is a peculiear demand to make of institutions which often, by tradition or explicit credo, are political organs. It is a peculiar demand to make of editors and reporters who have none of the professional apparatus which, for doctors or lawyers or scientists, is supposed to guarantee objectivity.”


“The question assumes special interest when one learns that, before the 1830s, objectivity was not an issue. American newspapers were expected to present a partisan viewpoint, not a neutral one. Indeed, they were not expected to report the ‘news’ of the day at all in the way we conceive it—the idea of ‘news’ itself was invented in the Jacksonian era. If we are to understand the idea of objectivity in journalism, the transformation of the press in the Jacksonian period must be examined.


There is an obvious explanation of why the idea of news, once established, should have turned into nonpartisan, strictly factual news later in the century. This has to do with the rise of the first American wire service, the Associated Press. The telegraph was invented in the 1840s, and, to take advantage of its speed in transmitting news, a group of New York newspapers organized the AP in 1848. Since the AP gathered news for publication in a variety of papers with widely different political allegiances, it could only succeed by making its reporting ‘objective’ enough to be acceptable to all of its members and clients.”


“But into the first decades of the twentieth century, even at the New York Times, it was uncommon for journalists to see a sharp divide between facts and values. Yet the belief in objectivity is just this: the belief that one can and should separate facts from values …”


SloTownMan

My words exactly.


If a “dwindling support base for Hill” is all we’re going to get, so be it. What scares me is that there was a continuing support base to re-elect him after his first term hi-jinks.


As for the PLA argument, I respectfully disagree. I’m fine with local hire requirements, especially with public works projects approved by local voter approved bond issues. If local school boards are going to require a PLA for bond issue projects, then the voting public should be informed of that before the bond issues are added to any ballot. To withhold that information until after an election is disingenuous. As an attorney, I would hope you would agree with that.

There are many well qualified and experienced local non-union contractors. They are forced into a level playing field by Davis-Bacon prevailing wage laws. There are several large (for this area anyway) experienced construction firms that have become non-signatory over the past several years for various reasons. For a smaller local contractor, signing a union contract can be a death sentence because of the limited demand for public works projects. Doing business in a metropolitan area is a different story, but here it doesn’t make sense.


Spin spin spin all you want, your article is just rubbish. Yuck


Is that the best you can do? rubbish?


Part of the problem or part of the solution, pick one.


It’s an opinion piece. Don’t read it next time.