Diablo Canyon nuclear plant must be shut down

May 15, 2015

Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power PlantOPINION By FRIENDS OF THE EARTH

Despite repeated assertions by Pacific Gas & Electric Co. that the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant is safe from earthquakes, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has ordered PG&E to provide more proof. Friends of the Earth believes that the order confirms concerns that faults surrounding Diablo Canyon are capable of more ground motion than the reactors were built to withstand and that the plant is in violation of its operating license and should be closed immediately.

On Wednesday, the NRC sent PG&E a letter requiring the utility to conduct further studies to show whether Diablo Canyon — California’s last nuclear plant, on the Pacific coast near San Luis Obispo — is operating within the bounds of its license. According to NRC criteria, nuclear plant operators must conduct further “seismic risk evaluation . . . if the design basis does not bound reevaluated hazard.”

In 2011, the NRC ranked Diablo Canyon as the nation’s plant most vulnerable to earthquakes stronger than it was designed to withstand. For the new safety review, Diablo Canyon is one of only two nuclear plants the NRC classified as high priority. PG&E must complete its review by June 2017, but the NRC may take until 2020 to evaluate whether to take regulatory action, which could include closing the plant and holding public hearings to determine if it is safe.

“The NRC is ordering further risk evaluations only for nuclear plants with newly discovered seismic hazards that exceed the basis for safety design, and has put Diablo Canyon in the highest priority for further review,” said Damon Moglen of Friends of the Earth. “The NRC won’t come out and say it, but, they’re essentially saying that the reactors are operating outside of their license. Under the law, that means these outdated reactors should be shut down immediately.”

The NRC letter is in response to a controversial PG&E seismic study, submitted in March as part of a disaster review ordered after the 2011 Fukushima reactor meltdown. PG&E’s report confirmed that the faults surrounding Diablo Canyon are far larger and more powerful than previously assumed, and that the shaking the faults could generate is much greater than that considered during design, construction and licensing more than 40 years ago. Despite the report’s alarming conclusions, PG&E said the plant is safe, and NRC publicly agreed.

The letter also confirms a key concern of the NRC’s former chief resident inspector at Diablo Canyon, Dr. Michael Peck. Nearly two years ago, Peck filed a formal dissent arguing that the newly discovered faults indicate the plant was operating in violation of its license and should be closed. The NRC rejected Peck’s appeal and later worked with PG&E to illegally, secretly and retroactively amend the terms of the license to make it appear that the plant is safe.

“Instead of enforcing the law and shutting Diablo Canyon down, the NRC is giving PG&E as much as five more years to re-evaluate the risk,” said Moglen. “That’s small comfort to the millions of Californians who would be in danger if Diablo Canyon is struck by an earthquake of the force that scientists know is possible at that location. Once again the NRC shows more interest in helping PG&E cover its assets than in protecting the public, and once again PG&E is putting profits before safety.”

At an April 28 public meeting the NRC and PG&E presented about the seismic risk evaluation at Diablo Canyon.

 


Loading...

46 Comments

  1. laowai says:

    This is what we should promote in the county, not an over aged nuclear reactor that is ready to fail and where a few individuals make good money.

    This solution will provide good jobs to much more people:

    “GEORGETOWN, TEXAS – There’s a fast-growing city in Texas that also has one of the most progressive energy programs in the country — and it’s not Austin.

    Located about 30 miles north of the Texas capital in a deeply conservative county, the city of Georgetown will be powered 100 percent by renewable energy within the next couple years. Georgetown’s residents and elected officials made the decision to invest in two large renewable energy projects, one solar and one wind, not because they reduced greenhouse gas emissions or sent a message about the viability of renewable energy — but because it just made sense, according to Mayor Dale Ross. “

    (-1) 1 Total Votes - 0 up - 1 down
  2. laowai says:

    “PG & E provides HUGE benefits to our community. They are one of the FEW employers that pay well here. Some people living here aren’t retired or don’t have a trust fund/inheritance. ”

    There are 269,000 residents in the county 1,400 people work at the plant including subcontractors, that’s below 0.5% of the county working at the power plant.
    it would make no difference is the thing is closed or not to the community. it will make a difference for the entire state if something goes wrong with that THING designed in the 70s.

    You are an egoistic hypocrite!

    (-7) 17 Total Votes - 5 up - 12 down
  3. laowai says:

    “Do we REALLY want to run off our kids, grandkids from the Central Coast? ”

    Are you arguing that the entire population of the central coast will rely on that stinkin power plant?

    No, i assume you dream that all your offspring is going to work there, just like daddy, how romantic….

    Well the rest of us (the majority) who don’t enjoy that well paying job at the plant, well paid just to keep our mouths closed in case a mishap happens, we are not comfortable with a power plant surrounded by fault line, at all.

    Best un-disputable argument: if someone would apply for that permit under the conditions we know today, he would be marked as insane.

    Close the freaking thing now and move on.

    And for you Homer, perhaps its time to look for another Job, plenty of other coorps are looking for gateguards.

    (-5) 17 Total Votes - 6 up - 11 down
  4. r0y says:

    The simple answer? They probably do not know. I mean, one or two of them might know Hill has “political enemies” or whatever Hill lies to them about, but the bulk of the company (up in San Fran) probably don’t know him from a Hill of beans.

    Get out and tell your friends at PG&E. Point them in the direction of CCN, or give them a copy of Hill’s letter in the New Times where he insults his electorate and basically everyone else.

    An acquaintance of mine is top-level management there (enough to fly back and forth quite often on the PG&E jet from SLO to SF several times a week). I will be speaking with him about this. He is a hard-working, very honest guy and I need to know what they know in the upper echelons at diablo / pg&g.

    (1) 5 Total Votes - 3 up - 2 down

Comments are closed.