Lobbying raises question: Who does Hill work for?

October 19, 2015

Editor’s Note: This is part two in a two-part exclusive series about San Luis Obispo County Supervisor Adam Hill’s consulting work for a company tied to a prominent developer. Part one, “Supervisor Hill’s 2 jobs raise conflict of interest,” includes several public documents in which Hill describes himself as a consultant.

By KAREN VELIE

PB Companies is working to get approval to build three four-story buildings at the corner of Nipomo and Marsh streets in San Luis Obispo with the assistance of County Supervisor Adam Hill, who has lobbied the city to approve the proposed project.

Dubbed San Luis Square, the proposal includes retail space, restaurants, 48 residential units, underground parking and a public plaza. The project spans four lots including the home of the former Foster Freeze Restaurant.

On its website, PB Companies says the project will help address a lack of available housing in the city.

“The lack of any mixed use, multifamily buildings in the area provide an unmatched opportunity to create something completely new and unique,” the PB Companies website says. “Moving forward, our plan is to develop not just another building, but create a synergy of space that residents and visitors can thrive in.”

Rendering of pathway at the proposed San Luis Square development.

Rendering of pathway at the proposed San Luis Square development.

At the same time, PB Companies principals John Belsher and Ryan Petetit are under fire for not paying subcontractors and lenders and for violating building codes. During the past few years, the partners have been in court over multiple financial controversies such as breach of contract and not paying fines to the city of San Luis Obispo for building violations.

Hill has testified in front of San Luis Obispo city bodies in favor of the city approving the San Luis Square proposal without disclosing he is a paid consultant for a company started by Belsher.

In 2014, Hill was paid at least $10,001 by San Luis Consulting, a firm tied to PB Companies, according to financial disclosure forms. But it’s unclear exactly what consulting jobs Hill has performed. He has not responded to questions from CalCoastNews about his consulting activities.

State records show Belsher was the only organizer of San Luis Consulting when he founded the company in July 2014 and that it uses the same San Luis Obispo address as PB Companies. A PB Companies internal document lists San Luis Consulting as one of its many holdings.

According to state conflict of interest rules, if public officials have received $500 or more (not including campaign donations) in the past 12 months from an entity, the officials cannot in any way attempt to use their official positions to influence a governmental decision that could impact that entity financially.

Supervisor Adam Hill

Supervisor Adam Hill

California Gov. Code 18704 says that officials with a conflict of interest cannot attempt to influence other government officials or agencies if their agency has authority or budgetary control of that body. These regulations are in place to stop public officials from approving funding for other government agencies and then lobbying those agencies to pass their favored projects.

As a county supervisor, Hill votes on distributing grant funds to local governments such as the city of San Luis Obispo. Hill has regularly lobbied San Luis Obispo City Council members and city boards to promote several development projects while also voting on whether the county will, or will not, award large grants to the city.

On July 13, Adam Hill testified in favor of PB Companies Marsh Street project at a joint meeting of the SLO City Architectural Review Committee and Cultural Heritage Committee.

In his speech, Hill repeated a presentation PB Companies staffers made to members of Save Our Downtown, a group with a mission to protect and promote the historical character, design, livability and economic success of San Luis Obispo’s downtown.

In their presentations, both PB Companies staffers and Hill said the project’s approval would help satisfy a need for workforce housing for employees of technology companies.

“Adam Hill, SLO, noted on state and county policies for the creation of a variety of housing in urban centers; commented on the importance of providing workforce housing for employees of technology-oriented companies,” the minutes of the July 13 meeting say.

Hill did not disclose his financial relationship with San Luis Consulting to the city before making his presentation.

In addition to state conflict of interest regulations, the city of San Luis Obispo passed an ordinance several decades ago making it a misdemeanor to speak in favor of a project without disclosing financial ties to the developer.

In 1994, San Luis Obispo passed an ordinance that requires “municipal advocates” to register with the city before attempting to influence decisions or actions of officials or staff in favor of a business in which they have financial ties. In addition, before speaking publicly, the ordinance requires the speaker to make an “oral disclosure of registration.”

“The city recognizes that municipal advocates do not have public authority, but they may have significant influence on the city, and the public has a right to know who is being paid to influence the decisions being made by the city, and any financial relationship between those who are being influenced and those who are trying to influence them,” according to the ordinance.

PB Companies is also attempting to get Coast National Bank Board members to lobby the city of San Luis Obispo to approve the project, according to a signed letter of intent between the bank and PB Companies uncovered by CCN.

According to the letter of intent, Coast National bank intends to be a co-applicant with PB Companies in one or more of the applications for the San Luis Square project. In the letter, the parties agree to multiple terms including the bank board’s support.

“The benefits for the parties are significant and include, increased circulation and parking,” and “potential public hearing and written support on behalf of Coast and its board members,” says the letter of intent which was signed by Belsher, Petetit and Coast National Bank CEO Anita Robinson.

Before being elected to office, Hill worked as a part-time lecturer for Cal Poly’s English department.

Hill first won a seat on the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors in 2008 and has since developed close relationships with a string of prominent local developers including Belsher, Petetit and Gary Grossman.

SLO County Supervisor Adam Hill, Dee Torres, developer Gary Grossman and Pismo Councilman Erik Howell at a recent fundraiser at Grossman's home.

SLO County Supervisor Adam Hill, Dee Torres, developer Gary Grossman and Pismo Beach Councilman Erik Howell at a recent fundraiser at Grossman’s home.

In fall 2014, Hill aggressively attempted to persuade members of the San Luis Obispo City Council to vote in favor of a land use change needed by developer Grossman to develop large parcels near the airport.

Shortly after Grossman entered into an agreement to buy the Dalidio Ranch, Grossman began lobbying the city to override a ruling by the airport commission limiting residential density in the flight path because of safety concerns.

Several local developers interviewed by CCN said residential projects are currently making more money than commercial ones, so Grossman would stand to receive a higher return on his investment by building high-density housing in the flight path.

While Hill lobbied city council members for the override, Grossman made a $50,000 donation to the SLO Housing Connection, a nonprofit started and run by Hill’s wife. The council then voted 4-1 in favor of the airport land use change.

Public officials have an ethical duty to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest, said Hana Callaghan, the director of the government ethics program at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University.

“Public officials have a fiduciary duty of loyalty to the public,” Callaghan said. “They have to put the public’s interests before their own.”

Get links to in-depth articles, like CCN on Facebook.


Loading...
67 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

PB Companies Employees

Marty Mohamed

Simon Lowrie

Erin Dasman


….


Erin Dasman is a professional photographer.


Part of making the hype.


Thieves always flock together. However, one has to wonder who at the City of San Luis Obispo is also on PB Companies payroll? Who has the power to waive development fees, push projects through despite serious issues? Who at the City of San Luis Obispo is on the take or more accurately, who isn’t on the take? We have had a union boss revealed for stealing city assets for personal gain and he is still at the city, likely stealing. Several officers prosecuted for various crimes. A fireman who nearly killed a guy and then rehired and promoted. A utilities working scamming residents, another utility worker growing and selling pot, a convicted felon working in the parks department, another felon working in utilities, a pd staff member going postal on facebook on fellow employees, and oh yes a utilities manager directing his staff to commit a felony while securing a job for his good buddy, Kelly gearheart’s son a job at the city. So to not expect that a city employee is on the take with PB Companies would be foolish.


hey hill, you can forget the traditional devils trio all of you have been engaging in for the prison shower trio you and petetit and belsher will have soon, very soon. Enjoy your freedom and lifestyles while it last. Hey what about that police report where Petetit beat up some young cal poly girl – now that report reads like a prominent san luis Obispo businessman.


All I can say is “pay to play” . The electorate needs to wake up!


The rendering for San Luis Square is missing the bums that will surely inhabit the public space.


The photo of the “Fab Four” should have the caption, “Two fruits, one nut and a flake!”


IMO they look like a gathering of hash runner members. That picture of Dee Torres sort of tells us all about here character and it is not good!


Excuse me.

They all want the same thing – all 4 of them

M-O-N-E-Y

Do not be fooled with any level of altruism.


They also want to

IMPORTANT!

Ha! Group of wanna bees


The ongoing information about Hill and Torres is mind numbing. One has to ask why they are still relevant and why have they both not been investigated?


Thanks to CCN, we all know what these two are about, but it seems to me that our elected officials look the other way. The Torres CAPSLO episode. Why was there never an FBI/DOJ investigation? Why has Hill not ever had an investigation into his antics? These two are supposed to represent the people. Seems they only represent themselves.


It’s astonishing to me that they both seem to thrive on the negative publicity. It’s as if they believe that they are untouchable. And so far for them, so good. It’s rather sickening. And that picture. I took away from that picture; Fuck you little people. We are gods. [Forgive my French].


As in the days of Noah, so we repeat.


It must be a scary thing for Mr. Dow to face. As for the Feds, they may take a while to investigate, but you can bet that they are thorough and that they are investigating Hill and his cronies.


I certainly hope so.


When did Democrats start investigating ,let alone charge fellow Democrats?

Remember the proof that there is no voter fraud in major east coast cities is the fact that Democrats have not prosecuted any Democrats for fraud.


Maybe because most fraud perpetrators are Republican? Hill is an aberration. And when did Republicans investigate Republicans? (Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!)


Sort og like the black panthers never were posted at voting polls with their clubs and the pcitures were a fake and therefore, Attorney General Holder couldn’t prosecutee.


Hill is the Teflon Supervisor. All this crap continually swirls around him, but none of it sticks. How can this be?


Maybe he swirls back? I’d ask his friends, correction, his aquaintances, correction, his business partners?