Coronavirus shutdown shows dust on the Nipomo Mesa science is flawed

May 25, 2020

A view of the Nipomo Mesa from the Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area

By KAREN VELIE

Excessive dust days have more than doubled since RVs and off-road vehicles were barred from the Oceano Dunes, data from two Nipomo Mesa air quality monitoring sites show. California State Parks closed the Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area to all off-road and recreational vehicles on March 28 because of the coronavirus pandemic.

The air quality data called into question the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District’s theory, disputed by California state scientists, that off-road riding activities cause high dust levels detected on the Nipomo Mesa. This theory generally ignores that the Oceano Dunes lies within a larger complex of coastal sand dunes created by wind blowing sand from the shoreline.

For years, the APCD and Nipomo Mesa residents have clashed with state parks and off-road vehicle riders over the cause of dust in the air at the Nipomo Mesa. Both sides agree strong westerly winds blowing over the sand dunes transport dust to the mesa.

In 2018, California State Parks entered into a stipulated order of abatement with the APCD. The agreement mandates that the state reduce wind-blown dust, specifically dust particles that are 10 microns or less in diameter, on the Nipomo Mesa by 50 percent. Despite agreeing to the various terms in the agreement, state parks still denies that off-roading causes the dust on the mesa.

Access denied: Approximately 50 acres of camping and beach area closed off for APCD dust projects.

The  primary goal of the agreement is to ensure that concentrations of dust measured on the mesa stay within federal and state standards, as measured at two of the APCD’s air monitoring sites on the mesa, which are known as “CDF – Arroyo Grande” and “Nipomo-Guadalupe Road.”

Overall, the state has spent approximately $14 million in tax payer revenue in the last 10 years to reduce dust concentrations on the mesa. The state covered more than 150 acres of dune sand with vegetation or orange plastic fencing. Additional dune-covering projects are anticipated in the coming months and years, under the theory that the obstructions would help reduce dust produced by the blowing sand.

In January, State Parks Director Lisa Mangat shut down approximately half of the camping area and about 5 percent of the riding area at the Oceano Dunes, or approximately 50 acres near the shoreline. The area was popular with campers, and provided 50 percent of the park’s camping availability.

CalCoastNews examined archived data from wind and dust measurements collected from the two Nipomo Mesa air quality monitoring sites to determine if State Parks’ mandated efforts along with the closure of the park in March would lead to a reduction in dust concentrations.

Specifically, reporters examined the number of daily exceedances of state and federal air quality standards during the month of May for the past six years at the two monitoring sites. The CDF site is approximately 2.5 miles from the dune shoreline, on the southwest edge of Nipomo Mesa. The Nipomo-Guadalupe Road site is about four miles from the shore, on the lower edge of the mesa. Agricultural lands lie between the coastal dunes and the Nipomo Mesa.

The parameters were chosen because May is typically the windiest month in south San Luis Obispo County, and 2015 predates the various dune-covering operations undertaken by State Parks.

Wind data indicates that May’s average wind speed at the two monitoring sites has varied little from year to year. At the CDF site, the May winds average at about 5 miles per hour, and at the Nipomo-Guadalupe Road site, the winds are slightly stronger, averaging about 5.5 miles per hour.

The number of exceedances of California’s air quality standard for airborne dust tells a different story. At both of the air monitoring stations, a substantially greater number of May exceedances occurred this year compared to the other years, even though there have been no recreational vehicles on the dunes; and the month of May has not yet ended.

For example, at the CDF site in May 2019, there were six exceedances, but this year, as of May 22, the exceedances have doubled to 12. At the Nipomo-Guadalupe Road site in May 2019, there were only three exceedances, but as of May 22, exceedances have nearly quadrupled to 11.

As part of the agreement, a panel of scientific advisors, known as the Scientific Advisory Group (SAG), was formed to assist in the design and implementation of the various dune-covering projects. The SAG is led by William Nickling, an emeritus professor at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada.

In apparent anticipation that continued high-dust days with no vehicle recreation in the dunes would cause confusion, on April 6, Dr. Nickling and other SAG members authored a memorandum regarding the vehicle closure at Oceano Dunes and possible changes in dune dust emissions.

“It is the opinion of the SAG that the accumulated impact of OHV [off highway vehicle] activity remains a significant contributor to observed PM [dust] emissions at ODSVRA, even during this period in which the ODSVRA is temporarily closed to recreational uses,” according to the memorandum. “The SAG acknowledges that the Oceano Dunes are a naturally dusty surface that would experience PM emissions even in the absence of human activity, especially during this spring windy season. But the SAG is also clearly aware that decades of OHV activity have fundamentally altered the natural beach-dune landscape, making the dunes significantly more susceptible to PM emissions than they would be in a natural state.”

However, the SAG memorandum fails to explain how the dunes have been “fundamentally altered” to emit more dust, and also why the SAG did not anticipate the number of state exceedances for dust to substantially increase in the absence of vehicle recreation on the dunes.

One theory is that the recreational vehicles that used to park on the dunes, helped obstruct the wind flow.

Sign up for breaking news, alerts and updates with the Cal Coast News Top Stories.


Loading...

42
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
Calzonian

If there were no off-roaders, would there be more vegetation that would sequester the dunes dust and sand? Los Osos and San Luis Obispo don’t have this dust problem. there are no news stories about dust problems in Monterey or Vandenberg Village either. No off-roaders, lots of vegetation on the dunes and no news reports of above normal dust being deposited. 2 months of closure doesn’t fix decades of damage.


DocT

“If there were no off-roaders……” I suppose they don’t have a right to exist, since all they do is destroy vegetation and stir up dust for fun, but we’re not yet enlightened and progressive enough to just kill them outright…..


The next best thing to removing off-roaders from the gene pool is to make sure they have zero fun…..so close the dunes!


Plus, the dunes stimulates small business in the region and as we all know, small business hides Covid-19. We’ve got to destroy the economy in order to fight Covid-19!


I am troubled by one thing…..the dust numbers. What if we make it so “…there were no off-roaders” and it still comes out that dust happens?


I’m totally down with supporting our local APCD by flat-out lying about it and saying that dust is gone along with the fun and money….but what if some troublemakers find out the truth?


I think we better find out just how much Covid-19 is spread by out-of-towners and off-roaders and demonize them so they don’t return and help spread the virus…..even if the dust doesn’t cooperate.


The dust story is just a useful idiot anyways.


Downypaso

Re No news stories about dust in Monterey or Vandenberg: That’s because the air folks for those places were not so dumb as to put air monitoring equipment downwind of sand dunes.


Re Vegetation: There is more vegetation in the dunes now than there ever was. ‘


Re Decades: What damage?! You’re going to believe whatever a prof from Ontario Canada will tell you about your own backyard? See my note above about vegetation.


And welcome to the area. Let me guess, you’ve been here less than five years.


LeroyMoo

Here’s a win-win. With the million $ per year used for studies, move a bunch of RVs and tiny houses onto the Oceano beach to block the wind. Then put the homeless in them. Provide porta-potties and trash service. You could easily attract the homeless from that camp in the Santa Maria river bed.


Jorge Estrada

Sometimes I miss the smell of Castrol oil spewing out of high performance engines, the roar of sand buggies, and people frolicking in this love of extreme mechanical performance. I think about the thousands of miles of U.S. coastline, most of which is extremely limited to fishing, nude beaches, gay beaches and beach beaches. So why do we not preserve some for those who’s preference is the performance recreation? Yes I do see the beauty in nothingness and if that were the plan, that would be so untrue. The pressure for development is as obvious as the State always needing more money. Does anyone talk about the underlying lots that already exist, NO. Does anyone talk about other locals that have been closed to such uses only to be converted into a refined cash cow for the tax revenue streams, NO. The APCD’s attempt has proven to be another unfounded gimmick to shut down the dunes to dune buggies so what now? The resolve could likely be a compromise like limited numbers and passes that come with a price tag. Yes, it always comes down to the money game so for those who want their performance recreation, their financial performance will likely have to keep up too.


DocT

Screw the dust. If we’re going to beat the virus we’ve got to kill the economy.


analyticone

..and if we can’t close the wide open spaces due to a pandemic we will make up a story about vehicles blowing sand and killing the elderly.