San Simeon manager wants the community to pay his fine, legal fees

March 7, 2022


San Simeon Community Services District’s general manager wants local residents to foot the bill for his conflict of interest fines and legal fees.

The California Fair Political Practices Commission penalized Grace last year for the “inherent harm” he did to the community by sitting on both sides of the negotiating table. Grace negotiated a contract with Grace Environmental Services, a private company he owns, in 2016 in violation of state laws enacted to protect the public.

Grace’s attorneys are asking the San Simeon board to vote Tuesday to pay the controversial general manager’s $4,500 fine and to cover the cost of his legal defense, for a total of $53,746.

The district is primarily funded by local residents and business owners through their water and sewer bills. The home of 11 hotels, San Simeon has approximately 500 residents and a yearly district budget of almost $1 million for wastewater collection and treatment, road maintenance and street lights.

Even though Grace’s contract with the district includes an indemnity clause, it does not cover “intentional, willful, or negligent operations or conduct of Grace Environmental Services or any of its employees, agents or subcontractors.” Grace admitted to violating Government Code 1090 and agreed to pay the $4,500 penalty.

Because of concerns that Grace will sue the district if they do not agree to pay his fine and legal bills, the district is meeting in closed session Tuesday to discuss the potential of litigation if they refuse Grace’s demand.

Several of Grace’s critics are asking the board to make Grave responsible for his violations, and not the residents.

“Where’s his errors and omissions insurance?  Instead of being afraid of being sued by Charles Grace, the board should be terrified of being sued by their constituents for gifting public funds,” said Julie Tacker, a government watchdog. “If they pay his fine and his lawyer bills, what’s to stop him from sending his parking tickets to the district?”

The San Luis Obispo County District Attorney’s Office filed a civil suit in Sept. 2021 against Grace alleging illegal business practices and false advertising.

Prosecutors are asking the court to order San Simeon district officials to stop conducting unlawful and fraudulent acts of unfair competition, to stop making untrue or misleading statements, and to pay civil penalties of $2,500 for each act of unfair competition and for each false or misleading statement, in addition to court and investigation costs. These penalties currently add up to more than $2 million.

Grace has already racked up more than $40,000 in legal fees regarding the district attorney’s allegations, but has not yet asked the district to cover those bills, according to San Simeon district records.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

does anyone know what the board decided in close session?

Sometimes playing both sides of the fence will getcha right in the crotch.

Pound sand Grace!

They should be suing him!

This guy has an arrogance that is beyond understanding. What a mistake it would be to pay any of those fines. I would think if they did, then they are accepting culpability for his bad behavior.

That is the point isn’t it? The board knew the whole time. His countersuit would easily prove that in court. Leaving him out to dry will cost the district more money in long run, and could cause them further legal issues down the road. CYA move entirely.

Understand choosing to cover his legal fees is not a gift of public funds. At this point it may be a prudent business decision on the part of the district.

The Gift of Funds would only relate to paying his salary on a contract that technically didn’t exist. His entire salary from day 1 was the gift. These lawyer fees are chump change.

The two things are separate and don’t mix together.

Julie, if she actually lived in the CSD, could have standing to sue for the Gift-lost funds. There is nothing stopping that kind of action by any citizen right now.

Why in the world would they let him get away with it? Did they really think they could let it slide without the consequences? I’m sure if they cave and do pay, the residence will come together and sue them all?

He admitted to his violation and should pay his fine, there is no reason for the public to pay for his intentional fiasco.