SLO County judge accused of judicial activism in dunes ruling

April 18, 2022

Judge Tana Coates


An attorney for Friends of Oceano Dunes accused a San Luis Obispo County judge of judicial activism in her latest ruling which will allow the state to install 130 acres of additional dust control measures at the dunes.

SLO Superior Court Judge Tana Coates, on April 11, reversed her own temporary restraining order against the installation of new dust control measures at the dunes.

Her original restraining order came after Friends of Oceano Dunes provided new evidence that shows that only 14 percent of the particles blowing on the mesa originates at the dunes. The SLO County Air Pollution District had long claimed that 100 percent of particulates blowing on the Nipomo Mesa was comprised of mineral dust from the dunes.

Judge Coates’ February order relied on the likelihood that Friends would prevail in their lawsuit that questions the California Coastal Commission’s authority over the Oceano Dunes State Vehicle Recreation Area.

But, in her April 11 ruling canceling the temporary restraining order, Judge Coates referred to harm that could be caused if California State Parks is not able to install the dust mitigation fencing and vegetation before the windy season. She noted the importance of protecting people who live several miles away on the mesa from dust blowing from the dunes.

“Nonetheless, the court concludes that there is a substantial risk of harm to State Parks, the communities surrounding the Oceano Dunes, and the public as a whole, that outweighs the likelihood of Friends’ success on the merits,” Judge Coates wrote in her April 11 ruling.

Friends responded by filing an emergency petition with the Court of Appeal seeking a writ prohibiting State Parks from installing additional fencing and vegetation for dust control. The petition accuses Judge Coates’ ruling of “facilitating a known extra-jurisdictional action by the Coastal Commission,” based on an alleged harm.

“It ignores the foundational principle that the California Coastal Commission has no power other than that granted in the Coastal Act,” according to Friend’s petition. “It’s judicial activism that misconstrues the proper role of the court.”

For more than a decade, San Luis Obispo County’s Air Pollution Control District (APCD) has claimed that 100 percent of the dust particles blowing over the Nipomo Mesa are the result of off-roading at the Oceano Dunes. APCD tests had determined that 100 percent of the particulates blowing off the Oceano Dunes was comprised of mineral dust, but the APCD did not test the particulates blowing on the mesa.

State Parks entered into a stipulated order of abatement with the APCD in 2018. The order requires the state reduce wind-blown dust, specifically dust particles that are 10 microns or less in diameter, on the Nipomo Mesa by 50 percent. Despite agreeing to the various terms in the order, State Parks still denied that off-roading causes the dust on the mesa.

Based on the claim that 100 percent of the dust blowing on the mesa is from the Oceano Dunes, in March 2021, the Coastal Commission voted unanimously to phase out off-road vehicle usage at the Oceano Dunes over three years.

Friends filed a lawsuit in January accusing the Coastal Commission of overstepping its permitting authority over the state park and for continuing to require voided dust control measures.

Friends of Oceano Dunes is a not-for-profit corporation expressly created to preserve camping and off-highway vehicle recreation at the Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area. Friends represents approximately 28,000 members and users of the Oceano Dunes.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I know some judges show up on ballots and we get sort of a say if they get to keep their job, is this one of the judges?, maybe it’s time for all judges to get an okay from the voters to keep their job.

Ironic how deep her head must be in the sand to flip flop like that. “Science? What’s science? We’d rather just cater to people emotions.” Pathetic.

Turn coat?

Unfortunately, personal political bias and desired agendas are corrupting our judicial system and many judges’ ability to be unbias and follow the evidence, facts, and the true science in this particular matter. With this, where do we find justice and fairness for all? It would be interesting to know her political affiliations and those she supports. It might explain a lot.

The dunes are the tip of the sand iceberg. Everyone in this county elected or contracted is corrupt, and use politics like religion to subdue the masses who are sensationalized with social media and the technologic Denise of Babylon; Facebook, TV, Instagram, tiktok etc. Like PR Paso, how about free paso from propoganda. John Wallace, Tom O’Malley l, Kelly G, Karen R, Adam Hill, John Peschong, Jordan C. Corrupt. Oh yeah, Fartikson, the Sherrif. DA Downer; ie, Adams family. The dunes should just turn into a campsite, vs, off-road recreational first world pleasure at the expense of? Think your quad was American made, BS. Also, lifted trucks with 22 inch rims, and lifted like a pre runner welded with tape? Come on, stop this cultural trash.

I think you are mistaken. I think political bias, personal corruptions, empire building, denial of personal fault or responsibility, and proliferation of desired agendas have already completely corrupted our unjudicial system. Not just judges, but all those involved in the unjudicial system. The unjudicial system was never about justice and fairness. It was supposed to be about the law, and maybe at one time it was. Nowadays regular people cannot afford the time or money to buy a legal remedy, Only the very wealthy can buy the imposition of their will on others, and they do so all the time.

I usually try not to write in absolutes, but on this subject, the exceptions to what I am describing are so very few and far between as to be nothing but background noise.

Well stated.

Justice and fairness might come through the creation of a new gang?

Too little rigorous scientific investigation is being supplanted by too much unsupported bureaucratic and judicial discretion.