SLO County cracking down on the hospitality industry

December 19, 2022

By KAREN VELIE

The San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors is looking to restrict the ability for residents to allow overnight RV stays at their properties through Harvest Host and for event venues to host weddings and other functions.

Multiple local farms and wineries work with Harvest Host, which sets up visitors for overnight parking at businesses at no charge. Unlike RV parks, the sites do not offer amenities like water, power, waste disposal or campfires.

It is suggested, but not mandatory, that the overnight guest support the business, generally through eating at their establishments or purchasing produce or wine.

Four Sisters Vineyards and Winery has worked with Harvest Host for two and a half years. Amid the downturn in the economy, the income brought in through Harvest Host helped her stay afloat, said the winery’s co-owner Dr. Serena Friedman.

However, earlier this year, code enforcement began lodging large fines on some hosts while leaving others alone. SLO County Code Enforcement’s Building Division Supervisor Cynthia Alm has voiced concerns that unregulated camping creates a fire risk and RV’s create pollution.

The hosts argue that they do not allow camping or fires.

The Board of Supervisors asked staff to bring back an opinion on the program. Instead, staff came back last weeks and said they need three to four months to develop a framework. Supervisor Bruce Gibson then suggested they restrict Harvest Host to only commercial parking lots, which would allow very few local hosts to continue, and bring the issue back in the next 60 days.

San Luis Obispo County thrives through a vibrant travel industry. In 2021, travel related spending in SLO County exceeded $1.75 billion.

It is estimated that 4,000 people visit SLO County each week to attend weddings and other events, but that could soon change as county code enforcement staff is cracking down on venues they say do not meet state requirements.

A decade ago, SLO County staff told those seeking to operate event venues that they could get approvals as vacation rentals without having to get a minor use permit from the county. Staff then approved needed construction and improvements.

However, the county now says that those projects, many of which were constructed in the past 15 years, do not meet current state guidelines. Staff sent letters to 33 venues wanting them to quit operating until they make costly changes, with some estimated at more than $250,000.

Supervisor Debbie Arnold argued earlier this month that venues that followed the rules 10 years ago should be permitted to continue operating while they make any required changes. The Board of Supervisors voted to bring the issue back in January to create a new policy regarding venues.


Loading...
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Does this mean that they will be fining the campers at SLO Safe Park?


Can’t the county be happy with just realizing, it brings MORE people spending MORE $$ in this county? And quit nitpicking businesses trying to stay afloat?

I don;t own a winery, nor any place I can have RV’s staying on my property, but too many fat noses interfering with daily survival makes one want to move on to less stressful places.


By all means, crack down on those but don’t bother the homeless living in motorhomes and vehicles on Palisades Ave in Los Osos…


Harvest Host must have refused to participate in being shaken down by these crooks.


It would be refreshing to have the B of S form a plan rather than the fee generating staff, deciding how this will benefit them. If the B of S guidance is faulty, we elect new B of S. Better to elect the B of S on what they accomplished by rather than creative lip service for the staff.


Anything to make the lives of the taxpayer harder, its not like they are running a Air B&B.


So say you have a family member who is traveling in their RV and in your area, will it be illegal from them to spend some time staying on your property?


“Staff sent letters to 33 venues wanting them to quit operating until they make costly changes, with some estimated at more than $250,000.” how much of that $250,000 is in permits and ancillary costs to the county/state? and would there be any routine renewal costs?


There is nothing wrong with Harvest Host…. wineries and restaurants with the room can increase their sales out of season… what is a problem SLO county supervisors…. are thousands of homeless living under trees along the highway and along side of our creeks…


Ahh, thats an easy one to answer, the county gets free money, ours, from the state for homeless and then passes it on to who ever they want to for favors, but in the case of this there is no money given to the county.


Listen to the last BOS meeting. They are differentiating between:

A) handful of self contained RV spaces in commercial parking lots in an ongoing winery business, with a 7 day a week operation to supervise, approved emergency access and support;

… versus … my interpretation

B) HippieCampie, unregulatable, get drunk/loaded, shit in the creek, set camp fires, very “nobody knows what I am doing” rural, neighbors be …, property values and sale disclosures be …, who knows WHAT the … is going on, LEO burden, in short >>>NOMADS. Look it up on Google. Look it UP. This HipCamp plague is infecting the country and wants to infect our rural areas.

This County should allow A and not B.

Solution: the County notifies HipCamp that their dispersed uses are: 1) not allowed; 2) contrary to County ordinances; 3) the County is going to sue the living … out of HipCamp, if they post sites in this County; 4) begin said suit; 5) Make $ for the County.

Having law breakers pay for enforcement is as old as the West. ‘Bout time we got some stones.

As for Four Sisters Vineyards and Winery, here’s the link. Dunno the prob, permit is good, very good Cab.

https://energov.sloplanning.org/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService#/search?m=1&fm=1&ps=10&pn=1&em=true&st=2995%20Pleasant