San Luis Obispo’s zany bike lanes

December 23, 2023

OPINION by T. KEITH GURNEE

Here’s another reason why the city of San Luis Obispo should be tearing out the utterly unnecessary protected bike lanes it has been installing along Broad, Chorro, and Ramona streets constituting the Anholm Bikeway.

· Never mind the elimination of nearly 100 much-needed on-street parking spaces serving the neighborhood.

· Never mind the dangerous two-way bike lane along Chorro Street (see the attached photo) requiring residents to back out of 16 driveways to cross those lanes and get to very narrow travel lanes.

· Never mind the bicycle and multiple car accidents that have already been caused by these installations.

· Never mind the black scuff marks from car tires that have hit and streaked the concrete curbs.

· Never mind the elimination of a “do not pass” solid double center line in favor of a dotted yellow line to encourage passing and speeding along Broad and Chorro streets.

· Never mind the original cost estimate of $1.1 million for these improvements, only to have the city overrule the city’s special commission’s recommendation against the project in awarding a bid of over $6 million to complete the project.

· Never mind the change orders that will likely move the expense into the $7 million range.

· Never mind the overwhelming opposition of neighborhood residents to what the city has chosen to call “improvements”.

· Never mind this act of publicly sponsored vandalism at the hands of a narrow special interest group to diminish the livability of a once great residential neighborhood.

In the early 1970s, the city of San Luis Obispo sponsored the first bikeway master plan that was prepared by avid cyclist John Williamson. That plan recommended against on-street bike lanes, let alone “protected” ones. Instead, it recommended that bikes and cars should share the road, the condition that existed along Broad and Chorro streets without any accidents for decades.

But perhaps the most interesting aspect of that plan was the strong recommendation for regularly sweeping the streets to keep them safe for cyclists. The attached photo was taken this morning looking down Chorro Street from Mission Street towards downtown San Luis Obispo.

The four-block long stretch of Chorro Street between Mission and Lincoln streets is clogged with a thick carpet of leaf drop. What cyclists would want to steer through this slop?

Conventional city street sweepers are too wide to clear this debris, likely forcing the city to acquire custom equipment to clear the bikeways far more often than the traditional street sweeping schedule of once per month. Just one more reason why this city should never have pursued this project.

When the city started considering whether or not to construct the Anholm Bikeway, Councilmember Andy Pease stated at a council meeting that “if it doesn’t work, we can remove it.”

Well Andy, that’s not exactly a fiscally responsible position, but if the shoe fits wear it.It’s time to remove these hazardous conditions and bring back the safety, livability, and ambience our once great neighborhood enjoyed.

Otherwise, these ugly “improvements” will become little more than very expensive monuments to failure.

 


Loading...
39 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Amen.


….Never mind that most of the nieghorhood ‘ Novelty Bike’ riders still use the Lincoln st. route so they can continue to avoid the stop signs ( they normally run) when they are on Chorro.) as well as the traffic and hub bub – just like residents told the city council during public comment time in the past.

Thinking creating more of these lanes will influence more bike riders is fantasy.

I hope someday somebody is made to account for this collassal waste of money when the rest of the city’s infrastructure is unraveling. If you set out to find a more ridiculous waste of money , you couldn’t have done better than this. Congratulations!


Increased use of electric bikes means somewhat higher speeds by those vehicles compared to the traditional, strictly self-propelled bicycles. Add a slight or even moderate increased use of two-wheel transport due to the mode being promoted in SLO. It won’t be long before we see serious injuries, even fatalities, due to the dangerous design of “bike channels” and the unsafe circumstances they create for cyclists as well as motorized vehicles. SLO’s approach to bicycle accommodation and safety is illogical, irresponsible and unsafe. In the future I hope any severely injured cyclists can obtain the services of a skilled lawyer who can convince a jury of the stupidity, malfeasance and inherent dangers built into certain aspects of SLO’s bicycle infrastructure. Punitive monetary damages may be the only thing that convinces the city council of their folly.


You seem more concerned that cars will hit the protested bike lanes/traffic calming measures than cars hitting and injuring cyclists.


I don’t know where the idea that separating cars and bikes, so they don’t share the same space, is somehow more dangerous for cyclists (and motorists). Pedestrians don’t walk on the same streets as cars, they have dedicated sidewalks, we all agree that makes sense, and no one thinks that if we took them away, that would be safer.


Lol, what a biased article. These lanes are proven to increase safety for everyone, increase people using bike lanes and reduce traffic. Safer for pedestrians and safer for kids walking on sidewalks. Every single city in the world, where there has been an investment in improving cycling infrastructure, has seen a net positive by doing this. An overwhelming majority of cyclists who use these paths are the ones you never see. The commuters getting to work early in the morning or riding home late at night. NOT the dudes in kits.


It has always been baffling to me. Most drivers dont want cyclists in the road with them. Most cyclist dont want to be in the road with cars. Its a win/win for everyone, yet the loud minority of folks too short sighted to see the long term benefits always come out of the woodwork. Usually with arguments about lack of parking or how the neighborhood hates it, as if they could speak for literally everyone in the entire neighborhood. Any guess what happens when you have better bike lanes? Less people drive and more people ride! SLO has one of the largest cycling friendly communities in the country.


Of course when there is a change (improvement) in infrastructure it will take some getting used to and people will need to adjust for a while, that takes time and there will be some accidents because of it. I’d rather have my kids playing on the sidewalk with the extra buffer from traffic, thanks. And their generation will have grown up with this being the standard. I have a friend whos brother was killed in a quiet neighborhood from a passing car who got too close to the curb. Kids die from cars a lot. Give the people space from them.


Sharing the road is an outdated idea, as he quotes someone from the 1970s. Yeah. The world is changing so please get over it.


I live in SLO and these lanes rule and almost everyone loves them here. Especially families. This picture must have been taken like RIGHT after one of the recent storms we had, or maybe even during lol. I ride these lanes every day and they are always clean as fuck. Our weather here is amazing like 90% of the time, its a large part of why people live here and ride so much. You wonder why we want to improve bicycle infrastructure??


Sharing the road is an outdated idea?!?! Do real cyclists concur with your nonsense opinion? Does that mean the county roads maintenance department can now remove all the ‘Share the Road’ reminders throughout the rural areas and backroads?


The people complaining about these bike lanes are the same people who are too scared to ride bicycles in traffic, like they suggest.


Try to do all your errands by bicycle, T. Keith. It’ll do wonders for your state of mind, and your beer gut.


That’s totally bass ackwards. Serious real cyclists are capable and not afraid to ride on and utilize the roadways as the California Vehicle Code specifies/requires (or at least used to). Dedicated, channelized bike trenches are less safe than traditional marked bike lanes at the far-right edge of the traffic lane. People too scared of traffic or lacking the proper riding skills to responsibly propel themselves with clear intent on a roadway are the ones pushing for these segregated corridors of chaos and waste.


Could you cite your source that protected bike lanes are less safe than sharing roadways? I have a 2019 study from University of Colorado Denver that says the opposite is true.


Boo hoo. Do you want some cheese with your whine?


The installation of bike lanes has severely limited on-street parking in residential neighborhoods. While the roadways belong to the city, the city-imposed extinction of on-street parking for visitors has lowered the value of these properties, IMHO. I encourage these property owners to appeal to the county assessor to see if their properties’ assessed values and taxes can be lowered accordingly.


Trying to make right hand turns downtown I have been close to two collisions with bikes that were hiding behind parked cars. I hate these bike lanes and wish they were all gone!


Those downtown lanes are utterly stupid, those and the bumpers on the street and the glue down poles, at least before toy could block the bike lane to make a right hand turn, this lessened the chance of hitting a bike, but now if you have to stop for a pedestrian a bike will zoom up along side you thinking they have the right of way and they will get hit, those right hand turns are too busy and a bike creeping up on you is forgotten, I like isoslo have witnessed a near collision between a bike and car, the bike will loose.


Cyclists genuinely expect people to just voluntarily get closer to a possibly fatal head on collision so that they can exercise on the side of the road… Horrible people imo.


I quote the story: “When the city started considering whether or not to construct the Anholm Bikeway, Councilmember Andy Pease stated at a council meeting that “if it doesn’t work, we can remove it.”


It’s also true that we can remove Councilmember Andy Pease.


Good luck with that. When The Ministry of Truth (Tribune) supports Big Brother and his chosen cabinet, the results of elections are pre-ordained.


More than 20 years ago the city did an experiment in “traffic calming” on Chorro — lots of bumps, roundabouts and other gizmos. Clearly it was nuts — way too much stuff all at once. Drivers were furious. The experiment, however, was just that — temporary structures easily removed and pretty cheap costwise. After a fatal accident caused by alcohol, roundabouts and a utility pole, all that stuff came out, really fast. With the bike stuff on Chorro, however, there was only full-speed ahead with what’s already a $7.4 million project (the author’s number is outdated). People asked this be tried with temporary materials, like the earlier experiment, but our affluent city staff knew better and refused. Thus we have what we have, and it’s a danger to all. So, council member Pease, have you seen enough by now with the string of auto and bike accidents caused by this “safety route,” or must we wait for another fatality before the plainly visible becomes visible to the city?