Destroying California’s economy one energy sector at a itme

June 21, 2025

Andy Caldwell

OPINION by ANDY CALDWELL

The Diablo Nuclear Power Plant in Avila Beach generates some 10% of California’s electricity supply without generating any greenhouse gases. It represents $1 billion in annual economic contributions to our region including a $226 million payroll.

Nevertheless, it was slated to close prematurely for three reasons, that is, before it got a temporary five-year extension, and that was because Newsom didn’t want to be running for president while California was in the throes of routine rolling blackouts.

First, regulators in California wanted PG&E to build enough tank capacity to cool some 2.5 billion gallons of water used to cool the reactor before returning the water to the ocean. That is, Diablo takes in cold water from the ocean and returns it at above ambient temperature.

Building the tanks to satisfy the state’s “once-through-cooling” reg would have cost a minimum of $10 billion, and worse, it would have been nearly impossible to construct without making space by moving a mountain.

Second, California long ago promulgated what is known as its renewable portfolio standard. This standard requires that our utility providers create a portfolio of energy sources that are 60% renewable by 2030.

The problem here is that nuclear power is not considered “renewable” and because it comprises so large a component of PG&E’s portfolio, the utility could not comply with the mandate. Too much of a good thing, in my opinion, as nuclear power supplies base-load power meaning it produces constantly without interruption 24/7/365.

Solar and wind, on the other hand, are completely intermittent and thereby unreliable for continuous power generation.

Moreover, it is ridiculous to pretend wind and solar are “renewable” and nuclear is not. How so? Because uranium must be mined, the powers-that-be claim it doesn’t qualify as renewable.

Yet, where and how do we get the raw materials to build wind turbines, batteries, and solar panels? They are mined just like uranium Moreover, the life span of wind turbines and solar panels is extremely limited compared to a nuclear power plant.

Reason number three for Diablo’s premature closure had to do with a scheme known as community choice energy. Because California, in some people’s opinion, was not moving fast enough toward 100% renewable energy, the state legislature allowed cities and counties to form their own energy coops.

The largest one serving the Central Coast is called 3CE, which stands for Central Coast Community Energy. You were automatically opted in by local politicians who were promised freebies, e.g., electric buses, in return.

In essence, the legislation deconstructed the utility franchise model by separating generation and transmission of power and it also created uncertainty for the western state’s coop that shares electricity between states.

That is, these community choice aggregators are allowed to buy and/or create their own sources of electricity and force the utilities (PG&E and Edison) to use their transmission lines to deliver the power per their direction.  For instance, the power generated by the wind turbines in Lompoc is credited to the community choice program that serves Marin County.

How does this relate to the closure of Diablo? The community choice aggregators would not buy nuclear-ggiations multiplied throughout the state.

Oil and gas

California has been attacking the oil and gas industry by way of a strategy of triangulation including drilling, refining, and consumption of the same and the dominoes are falling. Less production means refiners don’t have enough oil to use to create finished products. That is, as production falters, the refineries will be forced to close.

This plus the pressure that California has put on the oil industry and refineries by way of the California Air Resources Board and local air pollution control districts makes for an untenable future. Two refineries closing this year means California will lose over 20% of refinery capacity.

There was, at one time, over 40 refineries in our state. Next year, only seven will remain. What about importing gasoline from other states? We can’t because our laws require a special blend that can only be made by our remaining refineries.

The good news? Just as somebody in Sacramento figured they had to throw Diablo a lifeline less we suffer from regular blackouts, some state dems are beginning to panic about the closure of refineries.

As the Daily Caller reported, California’s Committee on Utilities and Energy grilled several state regulators about a possible gas price spike as two major refineries prepare to close. In the greatest understatement ever, Democratic Assemblyman David Alvarez of San Diego stated, “We have a crisis on our hand that may have been self-created by the actions perhaps taken by the state, by regulators.” May have been self-created? You think?

Another Democratic Assembly representative, Cottie Petrie-Norris from Irvine declared, “I know what climate leadership does not look like, and that is $10 gas.”

Not to be deterred, county supervisors Capps, Hartmann and Lee have decided to do their part to make things worse by banning new oil and gas drilling and preparing to shut down those already in operation. Why is that?  Because zealots such as these three county sups want gasoline to be so unaffordable that consumers will be forced into electric vehicles.

Andy Caldwell is the executive director of COLAB in Santa Barbara County and host of The Andy Caldwell Radio Show, weekdays from 3-5 p.m. on  FM 98.5, FM 99.5, AM 1240, AM 1290 and FM 96.9.

 


Loading...
18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Evidence suggests the existence of anti-wind energy propaganda, often amplified by political figures and funded by fossil fuel interests, which spreads misinformation about wind turbines’ impacts on health, the environment, and property values. This propaganda aims to undermine public support for wind energy projects and obstruct the transition to renewable energy sources.

Specific Examples and Tactics:

Misleading claims about health impacts:

Anti-wind campaigns often promote unsubstantiated claims about wind turbines causing health problems like sleep disturbances, cardiovascular issues, and even cancer.

False narratives about environmental damage:

Propaganda includes claims about wind turbines harming wildlife, particularly birds and bats, and causing excessive land usage.

Dissemination of misinformation through social media:

Social media platforms are used to spread false or misleading information about wind energy, often targeting local communities and fueling opposition to specific projects.

Organized campaigns against offshore wind:

Fossil fuel interests have been linked to campaigns aimed at stopping offshore wind development, often using front groups and misinformation to create public resistance.

Exploitation of community concerns:

Anti-wind groups leverage genuine public concerns about noise, visual impact, and potential property value changes to create opposition to wind projects.

Conspiracy theories and distrust of institutions:

Research indicates that belief in conspiracy theories is a strong predictor of opposition to wind energy, suggesting that anti-wind narratives exploit existing psychological predispositions.

Funding from fossil fuel interests:

Many of the groups and individuals behind anti-wind campaigns are linked to fossil fuel companies or receive funding from them, highlighting the financial motivations behind the propaganda.

Consequences:

Hindered renewable energy transition:

The spread of misinformation can delay or prevent the development of wind energy projects, hindering the transition to clean energy sources.

Increased public distrust:

The spread of misinformation can erode public trust in institutions and experts, making it harder to address climate change and other environmental challenges.

Social division:

Anti-wind campaigns can create divisions within communities, pitting residents against each other and hindering community support for renewable energy.

Overall, the evidence suggests that a well-funded and organized effort is underway to undermine public support for wind energy through the dissemination of misinformation and the exploitation of legitimate public concerns, according to the Center for American Progress.


California is about to lose 20% of its gas supply https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fToO1vpMw8g


Our state will have to be bailed out by the feds…


You mean the state 4th largest economy in the world that continues to bailout the other 49 will need a bailout?


Fat chance.


Cash strapped California has to lean into gas and energy tax hard! Billions in deficit spending and only grim economic prospects for the near future -they will be adding a 65 cent increase effective July 1st. Simultaneously we are suing the remaining gas providers for “ knowingly providing a product that creates environmental hazards”.- something similar to the Tobacco company shakedown lawsuits of years back.

As energy costs continue to rise, the biggest losers locally are the thousands of low and middle income folks who have to commute from Santa Maria to SLO and as far as Paso. Currently 1 million Californians are behind on their PG and E bills.

Eventually the current political class responsible for all of this will be replaced , but the economic impact from their decisions will haunt us for years to come.


“tobacco company shakedown”… Pro lung cancer huh? Strange stance. Stranger still is your trust in PGE, or the actual current political class that are dooming us all. Old man and a dog; poor dog.


The state excise tax increase on gasoline going into effect on July 1 is 1.6 cents per gallon. Additionally, new low-carbon fuel standards imposed by California may have refineries charging an additional 6-8 cents per gallon, maybe 10 cents according to industry experts. The oft cited 65 cents per gallon increase on July 1 is believed to be unsubstantiated rumor. We will know for sure in a week or two.


Little to nothing this man states is supported by facts or science. Don’t like the state policies? Leave the state; please.


Does that also apply to the rioters in LA that are saying how bad the US is, should they leave too?


Some of them; yes, surely. lol


Who’s Science? Plu-ease! Obvious , undisputed economic turmoil is here in every sector.

I was born here in Cali , and thanks , but I’ll stay and watch the show . Love California- hate it’s current government.


More concerned with economics than quality of life…. there’s the problem. No one else is here to be your entertainment, no you theirs.


I’m with you old man, California, still the prettiest girl in school,


Which facts? The loss of 33 refineries? The 10% of the states need for electricity? That solar and wind totally depend on solar and wind to generate anything? That 3CE declared no change in your power bill each month, when there clearly would be, and is? That 3CE automatically put you on their list without your knowledge, but gave you a tiny time window to “opt out” (even if you knew about opting out)? That other states will not blend their gasoline to California standards, because it’s too expensive for them to do so? That Politicians suddenly discovered the economic disaster they planned and worked for, is not a good thing for citizens or votes?


I mean, give us a hint!


This crowd only gets minimal effort from me; I know better than to waste my time with quotes, links to research, or just plain common sense. Can’t force a camel to drink, ya know.. or do you?


Our state is so mismanaged its scary… just last week Newsom tried to get a handle on the budget… he wanted his free healthcare for migrants paused… not stopped just paused… the legislature said no… and then Newsom said we should charge them a small monthly fee like $100… the legislature said no… $30 a month… well when they voted they removed any fee so they could pass the bill…

This is the kind of lunacy that makes decisions on energy in our state…. Folks… please vote wise… before its too late….


Stuff like this happens when voters’ interests stop at “how many freebies can I get” from politicians I vote for? We receive this type of voter because registration starts at the DMV as part of the “motor voter” process and welfare application packets, which include a voter registration form.